Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
- LA_Mustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15604
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: El Porto, CA 90266
Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs

2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs
-
- Heisman
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:11 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
Sounds about right. He should have a big year and is already on the NBA radar. His size, shooting ability, and length will help him in the draft.
- LA_Mustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15604
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: El Porto, CA 90266
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
I agree. Also, next year's draft shouldn't be near as deep as this year's.
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs

2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15134
- Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: University Park,TX US
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
Which means late second round
-
- Heisman
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:11 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
ponyboy wrote:Which means late second round


Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
Shake didn't take that next step his 2nd year like many expected. With Semi gone, Shake will need to be more consistent on offense and carry the team. If that happens, he definitely can be a 1st rounder.
I miss Troy Matthews.
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
Didn't take that step? You're effin kidding, right?
- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.
Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs
- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.
Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
Leading SMU to a NCAA championship would do wonders for his draft status.
- One Trick Pony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 9887
- Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 8:17 pm
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
That all begins at Atlantis in NassauΓÿåsmitty329 wrote:Leading SMU to a NCAA championship would do wonders for his draft status.
Booze-Aid is the new Kool-Aid mofos

-
- Varsity
- Posts: 273
- Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2010 1:04 pm
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 6:58 am
- Location: East Hampton, NY
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
One Trick Pony wrote:That all begins at Atlantis in NassauΓÿåsmitty329 wrote:Leading SMU to a NCAA championship would do wonders for his draft status.
Booze-Aid is the new Kool-Aid mofos
Cwazy wabbit.
Party at The Wopper!
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
No, I'm not effing kidding. He was incredibly inconsistent and was passive in many instances. Please don't say led team to most wins in school history...he wasn't the leader of the team last year. And without the gift that is Semi, we wouldn't have won the conference, regular season or tourney.hoopmanx wrote:Didn't take that step? You're effin kidding, right?
- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.
Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs
I miss Troy Matthews.
-
- Heisman
- Posts: 1070
- Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 1:11 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
Re: Shake projected #23 in next year's draft
I think I can agree with both of your arguments. Shake made the move to PG very well, had a real good assist/TO ratio, shot well, and was pretty clutch when we needed a big shot. I can also agree that Shake was inconsistent at times (based on how good Shake is).MFFL02 wrote:No, I'm not effing kidding. He was incredibly inconsistent and was passive in many instances. Please don't say led team to most wins in school history...he wasn't the leader of the team last year. And without the gift that is Semi, we wouldn't have won the conference, regular season or tourney.hoopmanx wrote:Didn't take that step? You're effin kidding, right?
- moved to PG seamlessly
- ended up best PG in league
- Assist to t/o ratio was good.
- PG on league regular season and tourney champs
- Led team to most wins in school history.
Becoming a PG in scouts eyes destroys everything. Look at the draft this year, 5 or 6 of top 11 were PGs
He took a step forward last year no doubt, but wasn't to college superstar status, where I think he can/should get to next year. It is going to be his and Jarrey's team next year. Shake has been putting in the work this offseason.