California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/10/sport/ca ... index.html
Genuinely interested in people's ideas on this, especially Stallion's, considering his legal background.
For the record, Washington and Colorado are also looking at similar bills.
Genuinely interested in people's ideas on this, especially Stallion's, considering his legal background.
For the record, Washington and Colorado are also looking at similar bills.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7234
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Allen, Tx, USA
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
It doesn't matter because the NCAA would declare them ineligible. But it opens up an opportunity to create a different organization that schools would eventually migrate to.
- ponyte
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 11216
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
- Contact:
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.
It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.
What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.
What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
See, people are saying that is what California wants. They want the NCAA to declare them ineligible so they can sue them for monopolistic practices. I'm not sure where it goes from there, but that sounds potentially catastrophic.
-
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 3645
- Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:55 am
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
Catastrophic is california in a nutshell.
Insert "this is fine" GIF
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.
It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.
What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
So you are saying/implying that a good idea (theoretically) originated in SAC or the state of CA? I think not. But, you are so on the mark regarding what this is all about. Tax dollars. The cities/state are financial disasters and now the state is led by Gavin Newsom, left wing nut job. The future does not look bright in the Golden state.
-
- Heisman
- Posts: 1560
- Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
the income tax angle is very interesting. now throw in state income tax. very high in California, none in Texas. If you play an away game in California, do you file a state income tax like the professional team players are required to do?
If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?
If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
We were just ahead of our time.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
bubba pony wrote:the income tax angle is very interesting. now throw in state income tax. very high in California, none in Texas. If you play an away game in California, do you file a state income tax like the professional team players are required to do?
If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?
If I work on location in FL I am still paid in TX. That's just my situation.
Leader of the Band-itos.
Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
malonish wrote:bubba pony wrote:the income tax angle is very interesting. now throw in state income tax. very high in California, none in Texas. If you play an away game in California, do you file a state income tax like the professional team players are required to do?
If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?
If I work on location in FL I am still paid in TX. That's just my situation.
I use to work at a company that got fined for not recording time/paying taxes for employees working remotely. There may be a % associated with it but I had to log time by client/location - one year I had to file taxes in 5 states. Hope you are legal.
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
I might spend 4-5 days once a year, and not even every year. Definitely working most of the year in TX and it's not even close.
Leader of the Band-itos.
Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

- well travelled pony
- All-American
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: Castle Rock, CO
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.
It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.
What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
Laughable statements. You might want to know facts before opening your mouth.
California currently sits on a $21 billion surplus. The economy boomed since 2011. You may disagree with Newsome, but he is no fool.
Go Ponies!
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
well travelled pony wrote:ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.
It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.
What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
Laughable statements. You might want to know facts before opening your mouth.
California currently sits on a $21 billion surplus. The economy boomed since 2011. You may disagree with Newsome, but he is no fool.
Go Ponies!
Just please don't California my Texas.
- well travelled pony
- All-American
- Posts: 867
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:29 pm
- Location: Castle Rock, CO
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
Pony ^ wrote:well travelled pony wrote:ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.
It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.
What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
Laughable statements. You might want to know facts before opening your mouth.
California currently sits on a $21 billion surplus. The economy boomed since 2011. You may disagree with Newsome, but he is no fool.
Go Ponies!
Just please don't California my Texas.
Okay. Can we please move on from bs political leanings?
Go Ponies!
Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill
3
Leader of the Band-itos.
Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!
PonyPride:
I think malonish is right
peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.
