California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
leopold
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Columbia, SC

California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by leopold »

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/10/sport/ca ... index.html

Genuinely interested in people's ideas on this, especially Stallion's, considering his legal background.

For the record, Washington and Colorado are also looking at similar bills.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7234
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by JasonB »

It doesn't matter because the NCAA would declare them ineligible. But it opens up an opportunity to create a different organization that schools would eventually migrate to.
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11216
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
Contact:

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by ponyte »

This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.

It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.

What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.
User avatar
leopold
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by leopold »

See, people are saying that is what California wants. They want the NCAA to declare them ineligible so they can sue them for monopolistic practices. I'm not sure where it goes from there, but that sounds potentially catastrophic.
SMU_Alum11
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3645
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2016 10:55 am

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by SMU_Alum11 »

Catastrophic is california in a nutshell.
Insert "this is fine" GIF
78pony
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1243
Joined: Tue Aug 26, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by 78pony »

ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.

It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.

What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.

So you are saying/implying that a good idea (theoretically) originated in SAC or the state of CA? I think not. But, you are so on the mark regarding what this is all about. Tax dollars. The cities/state are financial disasters and now the state is led by Gavin Newsom, left wing nut job. The future does not look bright in the Golden state.
bubba pony
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1560
Joined: Fri May 30, 2003 3:01 am

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by bubba pony »

the income tax angle is very interesting. now throw in state income tax. very high in California, none in Texas. If you play an away game in California, do you file a state income tax like the professional team players are required to do?

If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by EastStang »

We were just ahead of our time.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by malonish »

bubba pony wrote:the income tax angle is very interesting. now throw in state income tax. very high in California, none in Texas. If you play an away game in California, do you file a state income tax like the professional team players are required to do?

If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?


If I work on location in FL I am still paid in TX. That's just my situation.
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
User avatar
smitty329
All-American
All-American
Posts: 581
Joined: Sat Oct 27, 2007 6:10 pm
Location: McKinney, TX

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by smitty329 »

malonish wrote:
bubba pony wrote:the income tax angle is very interesting. now throw in state income tax. very high in California, none in Texas. If you play an away game in California, do you file a state income tax like the professional team players are required to do?

If you are from California and some of your away games are played in Alaska, Florida, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington or Wyoming with no state income tax, do you deduct that from your endorsement income?


If I work on location in FL I am still paid in TX. That's just my situation.


I use to work at a company that got fined for not recording time/paying taxes for employees working remotely. There may be a % associated with it but I had to log time by client/location - one year I had to file taxes in 5 states. Hope you are legal.
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by malonish »

I might spend 4-5 days once a year, and not even every year. Definitely working most of the year in TX and it's not even close.
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
User avatar
well travelled pony
All-American
All-American
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: Castle Rock, CO

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by well travelled pony »

ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.

It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.

What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.


Laughable statements. You might want to know facts before opening your mouth.

California currently sits on a $21 billion surplus. The economy boomed since 2011. You may disagree with Newsome, but he is no fool.

Go Ponies!
Pony ^
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5968
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by Pony ^ »

well travelled pony wrote:
ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.

It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.

What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.


Laughable statements. You might want to know facts before opening your mouth.

California currently sits on a $21 billion surplus. The economy boomed since 2011. You may disagree with Newsome, but he is no fool.

Go Ponies!



Just please don't California my Texas.
User avatar
well travelled pony
All-American
All-American
Posts: 867
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 6:29 pm
Location: Castle Rock, CO

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by well travelled pony »

Pony ^ wrote:
well travelled pony wrote:
ponyte wrote:This hasn't got crap to do with athletes. ItΓÇÖs about taxpayers. California is in a financial bind and needs more tax dollars. What better source than kids. They get to pay huge tax rates if they are really special athletes and some taxes if just a so-so guy. Most athletes will get nothing of course but the state doesn't care about that. It only wants more money. These kids will not be a non-profit or state entity shielded from tax liabilities.

It may force big time college sports to face some type of consideration. Imagine all the sports (mainly women's but many men's as well) that do not benefit. How does the university deal with that? This may create two categories of college athletes with the majority being left behind financially.

What sounds like a great idea after a few drinks too many in Sacramento may turn out to be a nightmare.


Laughable statements. You might want to know facts before opening your mouth.

California currently sits on a $21 billion surplus. The economy boomed since 2011. You may disagree with Newsome, but he is no fool.

Go Ponies!



Just please don't California my Texas.


Okay. Can we please move on from bs political leanings?

Go Ponies!
User avatar
malonish
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3793
Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 1:42 am
Location: Nope

Re: California passes NCAA Athlete Endorsement Bill

Post by malonish »

3
Leader of the Band-itos.

Mustangsabu wrote:
Malonish! You are the man!

PonyPride:
I think malonish is right

peruna81:
God bless you, malonish.

Image
Post Reply