Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
-
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2023 8:12 pm
Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
TTU alum and TTU major booster Cody Campbell expected to co-chair with Nick Saban the Presidential commission on CFB.
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
The ACC will not be adding Tortilla U.
-
- Scout Team
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 11:08 am
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
David Miller should be on that committee.
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Sand Aggies...Bobby Leach...
On a positive note, at least the travel cost would be less. Beyond that, it's Lubbock. Every girl has grit in her teeth.
On a positive note, at least the travel cost would be less. Beyond that, it's Lubbock. Every girl has grit in her teeth.
stable-boy for the four horsemen of the apocalypse
-
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Fri Aug 18, 2023 8:12 pm
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Basketball and northeastern thinking have already ruined the ACC since its founding. Now all thinking must be about improving its football wealth and power. Or else just agree that the ACC is not meant to be in the Top Tier of CFB and again go basketball-first and second and third.Dukie wrote:The ACC will not be adding Tortilla U.
Texas Tech has a good deal of what the ACC needs much more of: football-first athletics department that was always that way; very rich donors who will donate HUGE bucks for football; large state university; located in a state that always produces a HUGE amount of football talent; the TV market In which the largest number of its alums live (DFW) may be the most important TV market for football in the country.
Yes, the ACC needs Texas Tech to try to compete head to head with the SEC and BT just like it needs to drop Wake and perhaps a couple others.
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
What is your evidence that IΓÇÖm doing ΓÇ£asketballΓÇ¥ or ΓÇ£northeasternΓÇ¥ thinking, pal? IΓÇÖm a fifth-generation Texan and IΓÇÖm here as an SMU fan. And for the record, Tech basketball isnΓÇÖt bad.Graceland Tar Heel wrote:Basketball and northeastern thinking have already ruined the ACC since its founding. Now all thinking must be about improving its football wealth and power. Or else just agree that the ACC is not meant to be in the Top Tier of CFB and again go basketball-first and second and third.Dukie wrote:The ACC will not be adding Tortilla U.
Texas Tech has a good deal of what the ACC needs much more of: football-first athletics department that was always that way; very rich donors who will donate HUGE bucks for football; large state university; located in a state that always produces a HUGE amount of football talent; the TV market In which the largest number of its alums live (DFW) may be the most important TV market for football in the country.
Yes, the ACC needs Texas Tech to try to compete head to head with the SEC and BT just like it needs to drop Wake and perhaps a couple others.
But anyway, lots of schools have a similar profile to what you describe without being in the hard-to-reach armpit that is Lubbock. Tech isnΓÇÖt a flagship school and itΓÇÖs not even the land-grant school. It is not and wonΓÇÖt be a candidate while thereΓÇÖs any chance of prying any of the four actually attractive and flagship schools (sorry, WVU) out of the Big 12.
- Mustangs_Maroons
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2076
- Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2011 11:03 am
- Location: New York, NY
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
I donΓÇÖt have any knowledge of any of this but seems to me that tech would be one of the last candidates I would think the ACC would want. If itΓÇÖs a function of having the ability to choose, tech would be at the bottom of my list. If itΓÇÖs a function of what may be doable, maybe thatΓÇÖs why itΓÇÖs an option, if at all. However, there are so many other options that to me are much more interesting and also fit the profile of the ACC better.
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
100% agreed. If out of expediency, well, hello, Louisville-on-the-Upper-Brazos. Otherwise? Hell no.Mustangs_Maroons wrote:I donΓÇÖt have any knowledge of any of this but seems to me that tech would be one of the last candidates I would think the ACC would want. If itΓÇÖs a function of having the ability to choose, tech would be at the bottom of my list. If itΓÇÖs a function of what may be doable, maybe thatΓÇÖs why itΓÇÖs an option, if at all. However, there are so many other options that to me are much more interesting and also fit the profile of the ACC better.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Dukie wrote:What is your evidence that IΓÇÖm doing ΓÇ£asketballΓÇ¥ or ΓÇ£northeasternΓÇ¥ thinking, pal? IΓÇÖm a fifth-generation Texan and IΓÇÖm here as an SMU fan. And for the record, Tech basketball isnΓÇÖt bad.Graceland Tar Heel wrote:Basketball and northeastern thinking have already ruined the ACC since its founding. Now all thinking must be about improving its football wealth and power. Or else just agree that the ACC is not meant to be in the Top Tier of CFB and again go basketball-first and second and third.Dukie wrote:The ACC will not be adding Tortilla U.
Texas Tech has a good deal of what the ACC needs much more of: football-first athletics department that was always that way; very rich donors who will donate HUGE bucks for football; large state university; located in a state that always produces a HUGE amount of football talent; the TV market In which the largest number of its alums live (DFW) may be the most important TV market for football in the country.
Yes, the ACC needs Texas Tech to try to compete head to head with the SEC and BT just like it needs to drop Wake and perhaps a couple others.
But anyway, lots of schools have a similar profile to what you describe without being in the hard-to-reach armpit that is Lubbock. Tech isnΓÇÖt a flagship school and itΓÇÖs not even the land-grant school. It is not and wonΓÇÖt be a candidate while thereΓÇÖs any chance of prying any of the four actually attractive and flagship schools (sorry, WVU) out of the Big 12.
What are the 4 attractive flagship schools in the B12 that we should be going after? I don't see any of them that are on par with (historically) FSU, Clemson and Miami for football and Duke, UNC, and some others (again, historically speaking) for basketball. Baylor, Tech, and UH have had good basketball teams the last few years. But I would not call them blue-chip.
B12 has several decent schools, but I am having trouble picking 4 "flagship" schools.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 29068
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Pretty sure he's referring to Utah, Colorado, AZ State and AZ if the ACC wants to expand and become the "All Coasts Conference"highlander wrote:What are the 4 attractive flagship schools in the B12 that we should be going after? B12 has several decent schools, but I am having trouble picking 4 "flagship" schools.
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, and Utah, but otherwise yes.Charleston Pony wrote:Pretty sure he's referring to Utah, Colorado, AZ State and AZ if the ACC wants to expand and become the "All Coasts Conference"highlander wrote:What are the 4 attractive flagship schools in the B12 that we should be going after? B12 has several decent schools, but I am having trouble picking 4 "flagship" schools.
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
ah hell I forgot about Kansas. Not to buttress Graceland's argument, but that would be a hell of a basketball conference!Dukie wrote:Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, and Utah, but otherwise yes.Charleston Pony wrote:Pretty sure he's referring to Utah, Colorado, AZ State and AZ if the ACC wants to expand and become the "All Coasts Conference"highlander wrote:What are the 4 attractive flagship schools in the B12 that we should be going after? B12 has several decent schools, but I am having trouble picking 4 "flagship" schools.
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Another conference realignment threat, another kitten died. Yeah there are better choices in the Big XII. Utah is rumored to want out. They liked the prestige of being with Stanford and Cal and they don't particularly like being in the same conference as BYU. AU, ASU are reportedly not happy as well, but they do cash the checks. Colorado is just no. They are still mediocre at best even with Deon in charge. Kansas would be a good addition, but they probably can't leave without KSU (which does have a good football program). A few major defections and the Big XII is toast. I'd take UH over TT simply because they are in an urban area and have a good hoops program (although their fans are pretty awful).
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
- PonyPride
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 22520
- Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Selfishly, simply from a travel perspective, all of those sound preferable to Lubbock.Charleston Pony wrote:Pretty sure he's referring to Utah, Colorado, AZ State and AZ if the ACC wants to expand and become the "All Coasts Conference"highlander wrote:What are the 4 attractive flagship schools in the B12 that we should be going after? B12 has several decent schools, but I am having trouble picking 4 "flagship" schools.
PonyFans.com ... is really the premier place for Mustang talk on the Web.
ΓÇö New York Times
https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/
twitter.com/PonyFans
https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/
threads.com/ponyfans_staff
ΓÇö New York Times
https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/
twitter.com/PonyFans
https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/
threads.com/ponyfans_staff
Re: Reason that the ACC needs to add Texas Tech
Texas Tech would be at the bottom in academics by a wide margin. They are very close to being an open admission school. They used to say that you could tell if a Tech student had been on a date because there would be tobacco juice stains running down the passenger door of his pickup truck.