peruna81 wrote:Ceiling: 11-1 season, 7-1 conference, ACC Title game, CFP for year 2
Floor: 9-3 season, 5-3 conference, losses at Clem's son, Miami, and Louisville.

We'll have to talk to Clem about his kid then won't we

Did Chadley factor in some missing games to that equation?

Stadium won't ever grow, ensuring that demand is high and seats will be filled. This will then look good on TV.

LJ...

https://www.dallasnews.com/sports/smu-m ... l-program/

PonyPride wrote:Cornerback Brandon Stephens has agreed to a three-year, $36 million deal with the New York Jets

Not bad for the UCLA running back

I'll never forgive Rick for when June Jones brought in Hal Mumme to be OC not because of the results of that year but for the video intro of the first game.

The Run N Shoot guy brought in the Air Raid guy. What did Rick claim the offense would be on video?

Air N Shoot.

No.

The best option was ...

The soon to be previous administration held little regard for Title IX rights in the first place. All about Trans this and that. I'm not trying be offensive but facts are facts.

Yeah...equal NIL money from that department who just did the above for years. As earlier poster said, we'll see in a ...

highlander wrote:My favorite sentence: "Highlander is right." I don't hear it often enough.

Put it in your signature

numero_uno wrote:Speaking of Bowl Games. When we beat Ped State, we get the Fiesta Bowl. However, if we don't, do we lose out on a bowl opportunity?

5-12 seed game losers play no more games this season.

Delaware Cavalier wrote:

malonish wrote:I do not like the format of that forum

Neither do a lot of us on it.

Dang, sorry that you gotta deal with that.

I do not like the format of that forum

He has been hurt and has nearly 1000 yards rushing fewer than last year. Their best move is not to play him and I think he's done for the season with his injury anyway.

Your embeds are broken on that page

Kick blocker was #6 Harvey

I don't understand the "they wouldn't have a chance" quote. Duke would get the ball first in OT2 and both teams would get a possession. What am I missing?

Edit nevermind it was a hypothetical switching of positions in OT1 I think