|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Treadway21 » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:16 pm
AAC AAC AAC - f the rest. Proving our metal. Glad we are in the conference and glad we have a team that is competing at the highest level.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-

Treadway21

-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Big12Mustang » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:23 pm
SMU is the best team in the conference tied with Louisville. Next year it won't even be close! We will pick up the slack for Louisville in our conference, so I am not worried. Not bad AAC...Not Bad. 
-

Big12Mustang

-
- Posts: 2224
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2014 12:41 am
- Location: Uptown Dallas, TX
by Smu97186 » Sat Mar 22, 2014 11:36 pm
Theoretically, if temple and usf improve, and Tulsa can continue their momentum, next years aac will be as good or better than this years
-
Smu97186

-
- Posts: 480
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 11:51 pm
by SMU Section F » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:32 pm
Big12Mustang wrote:SMU is the best team in the conference tied with Louisville.
I'm as big an SMU fan as anyone, but it's pretty generous to consider us "tied" when they beat us twice this season. Now next year...
-

SMU Section F

-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:33 pm
by Rebel10 » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:54 pm
Smu97186 wrote:Theoretically, if temple and usf improve, and Tulsa can continue their momentum, next years aac will be as good or better than this years
If Masiello goes to USF that would help them imo.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
by PonySnob » Sun Mar 23, 2014 10:56 pm
Smu97186 wrote:Theoretically, if temple and usf improve, and Tulsa can continue their momentum, next years aac will be as good or better than this years
Losing a perennial top10-15 program and adding Tulsa doesn't really bring much national attention....... Net loss to the conference. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by sadderbudweiser » Mon Mar 24, 2014 5:32 am
PonySnob wrote:Smu97186 wrote:Theoretically, if temple and usf improve, and Tulsa can continue their momentum, next years aac will be as good or better than this years
Losing a perennial top10-15 program and adding Tulsa doesn't really bring much national attention....... Net loss to the conference. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I agree. Two notable AAC accomplishments so far this year: two in the sweet 16 and 5 ranked in the top 25,at the same time. Will either of those happen again soon?
Party at The Wopper!
-
sadderbudweiser

-
- Posts: 6069
- Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 6:58 am
- Location: East Hampton, NY
by Lebanese4Life » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:13 am
Big12Mustang wrote:SMU is the best team in the conference tied with Louisville. Next year it won't even be close! We will pick up the slack for Louisville in our conference, so I am not worried. Not bad AAC...Not Bad. 
this attitude mainly from the bandwagoners that we're the best needs to stop. yes, we've had some success (even though we didnt make the dance) but try to be humble and temper your expectations.
-
Lebanese4Life

-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: Kuwait
by Pony_Law » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:24 am
I'm not tempering expectations. A big issue with the SMU fan base is we are so unaccustomed to success that a large portion of the fan base is thankful for mediocre. June takes advantage of this and gets upset when he receives criticism for being incredibly mediocre. That needs to end as it breeds complacancy and leads to the program being mediocre.
I want more for SMU and LB wants more. LB wants to set a high bar for SMU as he is constantly talking about national championships. If you want to be the best, the first step is making that the stated goal and expecting to achieve it. I'll be realistic about SMU's chances but I expect us to be competing at the level where we could win a national championship because there is no reason for SMU not to be able to compete in basketball for a national championship. We have a great school, great facilities, and are surrounded by incredibly high high school basketball talent. If we can consistently get 3 of the top 25 basketball prospects from the metroplex alone to commit to play for SMU we will be a perennial tournament team and when those special players come through watch out. There are not that many other schools in the nation that can say that about the cities where they are located.
-
Pony_Law

-
- Posts: 2873
- Joined: Tue Sep 07, 2010 11:07 pm
by 1983 Cotton Bowl » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:35 am
Losing Louisville hurts a lot; there is no way to sugarcoat that. But if Temple and UH get their act together, and Tulsa continues on the right track and doesn't take a step back playing tougher competition, then the AAC could be very entertaining next year and be a deeper conference as well. We lose the panache of Louisville, but there is a path forward to continue the AAC as one of the strongest BB conferences in the country, and perhaps make it stronger top to bottom.
-

1983 Cotton Bowl

-
- Posts: 1745
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 2:17 pm
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina
by ojaipony » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:39 am
Pony_Law wrote:I'm not tempering expectations. A big issue with the SMU fan base is we are so unaccustomed to success that a large portion of the fan base is thankful for mediocre. June takes advantage of this and gets upset when he receives criticism for being incredibly mediocre. That needs to end as it breeds complacancy and leads to the program being mediocre.
I want more for SMU and LB wants more. LB wants to set a high bar for SMU as he is constantly talking about national championships. If you want to be the best, the first step is making that the stated goal and expecting to achieve it. I'll be realistic about SMU's chances but I expect us to be competing at the level where we could win a national championship because there is no reason for SMU not to be able to compete in basketball for a national championship. We have a great school, great facilities, and are surrounded by incredibly high high school basketball talent. If we can consistently get 3 of the top 25 basketball prospects from the metroplex alone to commit to play for SMU we will be a perennial tournament team and when those special players come through watch out. There are not that many other schools in the nation that can say that about the cities where they are located.
Agreed!
-
ojaipony

-
- Posts: 8281
- Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 5:02 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
by Lebanese4Life » Mon Mar 24, 2014 11:46 am
Pony_Law wrote:I'm not tempering expectations. A big issue with the SMU fan base is we are so unaccustomed to success that a large portion of the fan base is thankful for mediocre. June takes advantage of this and gets upset when he receives criticism for being incredibly mediocre. That needs to end as it breeds complacancy and leads to the program being mediocre.
I want more for SMU and LB wants more. LB wants to set a high bar for SMU as he is constantly talking about national championships. If you want to be the best, the first step is making that the stated goal and expecting to achieve it. I'll be realistic about SMU's chances but I expect us to be competing at the level where we could win a national championship because there is no reason for SMU not to be able to compete in basketball for a national championship. We have a great school, great facilities, and are surrounded by incredibly high high school basketball talent. If we can consistently get 3 of the top 25 basketball prospects from the metroplex alone to commit to play for SMU we will be a perennial tournament team and when those special players come through watch out. There are not that many other schools in the nation that can say that about the cities where they are located.
i expect big things next year too, but we don't need to act cocky and talk as if we're already achieving things. sure, we have a nice class coming in and some great pieces, but still, anything can happen. who knows, we might get shafted again by the selection committee. anything can happen.
-
Lebanese4Life

-
- Posts: 2937
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:58 am
- Location: Kuwait
by PonySnob » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:05 pm
AAC teams are going to have to deliver some wins in non-conference next year - especially when somebody plays a "big time" school.
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Treadway21 » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:06 pm
The ACC must have added Louisville to help the reputation of their conference in hoops. Lord knows they need the help.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and doesn't care who wins. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
-

Treadway21

-
- Posts: 6586
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SMU Section F » Mon Mar 24, 2014 12:06 pm
PonySnob wrote:AAC teams are going to have to deliver some wins in non-conference next year - especially when somebody plays a "big time" school.
Memphis versus Wichita State on a neutral court will be a big one.
-

SMU Section F

-
- Posts: 1479
- Joined: Mon Feb 06, 2012 3:33 pm
Return to Basketball
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
|
|