|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by hunters » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:34 pm
kill me now.
go smu.
-

hunters

-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Aug 29, 2005 1:36 pm
- Location: smu
by ponysooner » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:34 pm
The mustangs [deleted] stink beyond all understanding.
-
ponysooner

-
- Posts: 67
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 11:27 pm
by PonySnob » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:35 pm
Another pitiful outing by the Mustangs!!!!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by RGV Pony » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:35 pm
GREAT!!! I logged onto All Access noticing our guys had a 10-0 lead late in the 4th quarter...and watched an effort of determination, will, desire, guts, and never-say die....as Marshall refused to be beaten.
3rd and 12 in OT and we allow the QB to scramble for a first down. Wonderful.
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by Duke Blue Blood » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:36 pm
Should have never been in the first ficking place!
-

Duke Blue Blood

-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by peruna81 » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:36 pm
this one hurts worse than most...defense played hard, offense hard-ly...
sad...just sad.
no fuss with the officials, but man that was a tough non-fumble call..non holding call(s)...nevertheless, you have to win a game like this on the road, and expect no help...sad...
stable-boy for the four horsemen of the apocalypse
-
peruna81

-
- Posts: 3781
- Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: central Texas
by SoCal_Pony » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:38 pm
RGV,
Their QB passed up running opportunities the entire game...finally took advantage of it in the end.
Our defense played well enough to win today against a somewhat inept Marshall offense
-

SoCal_Pony

-
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
by SMUFinns » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:38 pm
Hey pony players, that was a tough way to lose but you must look at yourselfs, your coaches and ask! are we committed?
Sorry I fully support the ponies but what I saw was a real comedy of errors, poor play calling and no commitement by a number of players.
Play like it's your llast game, win inspite of poor play calling just fight.....
Get ready for the next game with this in mind...ponies
Power Mustangs "Now is the Time" They will believe in #PonyUp
-

SMUFinns

-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Garland,Tx,U.S.A
-
by PonySnob » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:39 pm
SoCal_Pony wrote:RGV,
Their QB passed up running opportunities the entire game...finally took advantage of it in the end.
Our defense played well enough to win today against a somewhat inept Marshall offense
The defense gave up about 400 yards.......its hard to say which is worse - the offense or the defense!!!!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Mustangs35SMU » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:40 pm
Definately the offense.
The defense was out there a ton more than the O and still held Marshall for most of the game.
But who cares, both sides suck.
-

Mustangs35SMU

-
- Posts: 13007
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Garland, TX
-
by RGV Pony » Sat Oct 01, 2005 6:41 pm
I agree 100%, So Cal. Our defense would've looked even better had our O lit up the stat sheet for more than 190 yards in 4+ quarters.
It sucks when you're on D and you spend the entire game on the field.
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by Duke Blue Blood » Sat Oct 01, 2005 7:00 pm
THAT was a fumble. Did anyone on here actually watch the game!!! TRhat game was stolen from us.
SMU Wins 10-7
-

Duke Blue Blood

-
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by BrianTinBigD » Sat Oct 01, 2005 8:38 pm
Ran it back on TIVO and it was coming out the moment he started to attempt to pass. It was a fumble. No doubt about it. Offensive play calling was still insane. Running Massey instead of Martin was just plain stupid. The OC is clueless. Bennet was ranting about re-evaluating everything after the game. Does that mean we get to re-evaluate his lack of coaching ability?
Class of '91
-

BrianTinBigD

-
- Posts: 1421
- Joined: Thu Aug 26, 2004 11:39 am
- Location: Allen, Texas
by Col. Nathan R. Jessep » Sun Oct 02, 2005 1:32 am
RGV Pony wrote:I agree 100%, So Cal. Our defense would've looked even better had our O lit up the stat sheet for more than 190 yards in 4+ quarters.
It sucks when you're on D and you spend the entire game on the field.
----------
RGV, don't let the facts get in your way:
[1] SMU offense had more time of possession (41-33 min);
[2] the offense gave defense 10-0 lead into 4Q.
Despite our anemic offensive output & stats, MU fumbled 4 times & the D never recovered once. SMU offense had no INT & I dont think we had any fumbles. It may have been 'playing ugly', but with a lead of 10-0, this was a game that the D could've put away in Q4, but didn't.
YOU WANT THE TRUTH? YOU CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH!
-

Col. Nathan R. Jessep

-
- Posts: 398
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 12:25 am
by Corso » Sun Oct 02, 2005 2:12 am
Yes, the offense struggled again. But the defense played its collective tail off. I was very proud of the effort given today, especially in wake of the non-effort thrown out there last week.
-

Corso

-
- Posts: 2820
- Joined: Sun Jul 02, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Richardson, Texas
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 20 guests
|
|