PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Godfather on Turner-administration

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby Mestengo » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:44 am

yikes
User avatar
Mestengo
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3668
Joined: Sat Oct 10, 2009 9:39 am

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby ponyte » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:48 am

Mestengo wrote:yikes

Good to see you back. Miss seeing you at games this year.
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11212
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby ALEX LIFESON » Sun Nov 23, 2014 4:00 pm

Yes, there have been improvements made of late, but, kind of like the Bill Cosby situation, when you have so many claiming that there are still problems, there has to be some level of fire.....somewhere. I've even had nonrevenue SMU coaches, shake their heads in frustration, and say, we still have problems that other schools don't.
User avatar
ALEX LIFESON
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11387
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: GARLAND

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby SoCal_Pony » Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:47 pm

ponyte wrote:One would hope that the general assumption that the winning Pony Express teams were more than just high paid bugger eating morons whose only goal was to meet fans expectations of winning.


Don't know why you would even think that.

I happen to be there during the Pony Express days. The players I met were genuinely nice guys who were well-received by the student body, I'm sure in no part to their success of the field (much like the current BB team). Certainly no one thought of them as morons, that's crazy talk.

I never said you received cash, although I did know players who contributed less than you did to the Pony Express success who were paid.

I never said you were given grades to play, although I strongly suspect we did things (as other schools did and do today) to 'help along' marginal students.

But to my bigger point ponyte, one that you are not responding to; 0-50-1, 0-40 & 0-21

By 3 criteria, 3 very fair and reasonable and illuminating criteria, we are 0-111-1

I'm not proud of that. I'm not OK with that. I see it leading to our ultimate death in FB and eventual return to irrelevancy in BB.

This is not simply about MK, this has been going on for 25 years. MK represents our commitment to athletics.

0-111-1

PATHETIC
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby SoCal_Pony » Sun Nov 23, 2014 6:55 pm

Times we have beaten a Big12 south school (TCU included only after they joined the Big12) post DP. ZERO TIMES 0-50-1

Times we have won a conference championship under RGT. ZERO TIMES 0-40

Times we have been ranked in the Top 65 (ie receive Tourney invite over past 21 years. ZERO TIMES 0-21
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby JasonB » Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:28 pm

If I had to guess at what happened with Kennedy - he was able to transfer in, and his credits came in. But if he changed his major from History, they wouldn't allow certain classes to transfer and wouldn't be eligible.

So, now he is in a position of having to work towards a major that is much harder than it is at Nova, and he can't switch because he will fall behind in the progress towards a degree.

I would guess that Larry would feel super guilty if MK isn't able to make it back, because he welcomed him in as a transfer and promised he would do what it takes to make him successful.

I've heard about other guys on the team struggling academically, so I am sure there is a ton of effort keeping them eligible, which is probably pretty exhausting for Larry and the staff.

We are going to have to figure out if we are an academic first school or an athletics first school.
JasonB
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7226
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
Location: Allen, Tx, USA

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby fifty » Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:37 pm

Really? We need to figure out if we're an athletics or academics school? What would make you think we're an athletics school other than the existence of the COC / David Miller?
fifty
Heisman
 
Posts: 1483
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 6:51 pm

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby SoCal_Pony » Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:56 pm

JasonB wrote:We are going to have to figure out if we are an academic first school or an athletics first school.


Sorry Jason, realize you are not a decision maker, but statements like this irk the crap out of me.

There are some 40 schools, mostly P5, who are either somewhat on par with us academically or actually superior to us. How come THEY have figured this out and we haven't.

More to the point, this is not an either or question. Athletic success actually enhances academics, especially in a sports crazy part of the world called Texas.
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby PonySnob » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:12 pm

SoCal_Pony wrote:
JasonB wrote:We are going to have to figure out if we are an academic first school or an athletics first school.


Sorry Jason, realize you are not a decision maker, but statements like this irk the crap out of me.

There are some 40 schools, mostly P5, who are either somewhat on par with us academically or actually superior to us. How come THEY have figured this out and we haven't.

More to the point, this is not an either or question. Athletic success actually enhances academics, especially in a sports crazy part of the world called Texas.


Who are the non-P5 schools that are academically on par or superior to SMU that have figured it out?
Peruna is my mascot!
User avatar
PonySnob
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 11516
Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby couch 'em » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:13 pm

I don't know if they 'figured it out' but Rice has long out performed us
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby Stallion » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:56 pm

if JasonB's theory is correct then under NCAA rules those "excess electives" that aren't part of his designated degree at SMU which he had to elect by his 3rd year couldn't count toward the academic progress toward degree. See my post above. I don't know Villanova's curriculum but its very likely that most of his freshman courses were not part of any designated degree but more like general liberal arts freshman curriculum. I think its very plausible. So was it SMU or the NCAA that really is to blame. All that nonsense about representations and "fraud" made by SMU when he came to SMU wouldn't matter under the 3rd year rule-NCAA rules would clearly override what he was told even if they actually were made
Last edited by Stallion on Mon Nov 24, 2014 12:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris

When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby smusic 00 » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:59 pm

Very interesting. Could have been doomed no matter what.
User avatar
smusic 00
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6912
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:15 pm
Location: Downtown

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby mustangxc » Mon Nov 24, 2014 7:37 am

Stallion wrote:if JasonB's theory is correct then under NCAA rules those "excess electives" that aren't part of his designated degree at SMU which he had to elect by his 3rd year couldn't count toward the academic progress toward degree. See my post above. I don't know Villanova's curriculum but its very likely that most of his freshman courses were not part of any designated degree but more like general liberal arts freshman curriculum. I think its very plausible. So was it SMU or the NCAA that really is to blame. All that nonsense about representations and "fraud" made by SMU when he came to SMU wouldn't matter under the 3rd year rule-NCAA rules would clearly override what he was told even if they actually were made


In that case Villanova would probably hold most of the blame since they did what was needed to keep him eligible for 2-3 years knowing full well that beyond that it would be impossible to keep him eligible based on the classes he took.
User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 7338
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby SMU 86 » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:35 am

JasonB wrote:We are going to have to figure out if we are an academic first school or an athletics first school.


I believe we can put both first at the same time.
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown

________________________Champion________________________
Image
User avatar
SMU 86
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12943
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 6:41 pm

Re: Godfather on Turner-administration

Postby Pony ^ » Mon Nov 24, 2014 9:48 am

Fire RGT
Pony ^
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5967
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

PreviousNext

Return to Basketball

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

 
cron