Charleston Pony wrote:I agree with all the comments that it was "not the same". My point was more along the lines of "it was a thoughtful thing for our coach and team to do". I thought the same thing about wearing black against Army even when others were so outraged. I had that same thought, i.e., some of these Army seniors might not be with us a year from now. I think JJ's heart was in the right place. It was his lack of work ethic and general attitude towards SMU (the little school that can't) that made most of us turn on him. My comment was just that when I saw the Carolina Blue Mustang logo, it made me think of the JJ bowl game tribute to Army and how very different our fans are going to react to Larry Brown and his team's gesture than how so many did to the black unis. Now, this might be a perfect Segway into about a 10 page discussion of uniforms...
Charleston, had the intent been sincere, I'm sure the JJ black uniform thing would have gone over better. But, we were told as fans that the black uniforms were to "honor the Armed Forces" - while black is really only a color for the West Point athletics teams. See thread linked below and read Arkpony's and Longtime's posts.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=51017The truth was that JJ just wanted to wear black. If it were truly something to honor the Armed Forces, something different would have been done, such as uniform patches of the seals of each branch or for each of our players to wear a patch with the initials of a recently fallen soldier. Or even an Army Green jersey with Navy Blue pants, an Air Force lighting bolt on the helmet, and socks honoring the Coast
Guard and Marines. That would be tacky, but it would be honoring the armed forces more than the black did.
Had the school said that we would wear black to boost recruiting, many would have been OK with it. But instead, they insulted our intelligence by asking us to accept some story about honoring the armed forces.
Ego play for Coach Tiki? Yep.
Thoughtful salute to the heroes on the other sideline? Yeah, right.