|
Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersnothing on this board could be considered credible evidence for an ncaa investigation.... and contrary to popular belief the ncaa compliance officers are not on PonyFans
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
Maybe they were "whispering in his ears" like all those Big 10 Coaches that were trying to get him transfer. Let's not even forget the Smu "had some one sit for Frazier" rumor. Btw I've actually represented athletes before the College Boards-they would have thrown that score out immediately and SMU would have to have immediately suspend\ Keith Frazier and request reinstatement before the NCAA. Why did Keith Frazier keep playing well after SMU has admitted they met with NCAA. This [deleted]' crap has got to stop Last edited by Stallion on Tue Mar 24, 2015 4:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersIs Nic even scheduled to graduate this semester?
"We will play man to man and we will pick you up at the airport." - Larry Brown
________________________Champion________________________ ![]()
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
Just wanted to point out that Maryland is no longer in the ACC ![]() Go Ponies!!
Beat whoever it is we are playing!! @PonyGrad
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersOh, good God. You're totally right. Still hard for me to wrap my brain around Maryland in the BIG.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersPlease read "UVA" in place of Maryland.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
Nic never spoke w/anyone nor instructed anyone to speak w/anyone. This is common place
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
I didn't say SMU had anyone sit for Frazier, I said a coach asked me IF SMU had had someone sit for him yet. I said I'm sure they will or something to that extent. It was a reference to how all of this was basically common knowledge in the industry at the time of Fraziers recruitment. Something was going to be done and it was, that's all. Ask anyone around Moore if what I say is false.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
Boy did Maryland benefit from the move to the Big 10. It's one move that ended up making sense.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
HOOPMANX: I didn't say SMU had anyone sit for Frazier, I said a coach asked me IF SMU had had someone sit for him yet. I said I'm sure they will or something to that extent. It was a reference to how all of this was basically common knowledge in the industry at the time of Fraziers recruitment. Something was going to be done and it was, that's all." Hoopmanx clearly insinuates based upon apparently "common knowledge in the industry" that SMU had someone sit for Keith Frazier-that was before he insinuated that SMU fixed Keith's grades: HOOPMANX: "Before he qualified, I was asked by one of our old RCs 'why we hadn't sat anyone' for him yet. I responded that 'its coming' and it was." HOOPMANX: "Admission has bent over backwards for Brown and we can't keep anyone eligible. We've been under investigation since about a year into his tenure for grade fixing" So which third hand rumor did you hear? "Common knowledge in the Industry" is the equivalent of [deleted]. His own words show he doesn't know jack "With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersIf I was hoopmans Atty I'd say asked and answered. You can object as non responsive if you'd like but let's move on
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shooters
Or you could PM and find out what I actually know. You are getting caught up in casual conversation semantics. 'and they did' just meant we got him qualified, at all costs. It wasn't meant as a definitive statement that we sat someone for his SATs or ACTs, just that we'd do something. My bad for getting caught in Mr Brady's 'letter of the law' nonsense. In effect, it doesn't matter if they sat someone for him or coerced a grade change, cause this entire thing was about keeping this relegated to DISD and avoid them tracing it to continued academic fraud at SMU. Lots was done to prevent that, which you don't want me ranting about on here. You aren't in the loop and you never will be b/c you don't have any knowledge to offer up that can't be googled. Stats and hubris is a pathetic way to spend a life
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersVanity, Definitely my favourite Sin!: http://youtu.be/3M68wcB6L0s
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersHave you ever considered the fact that Stallion is closer to the program than your friends are? Those same friends in which you so unabatedly rely on to spew your hearsay? Would help to know who your friends are so the rest of us can make an educated decision on who is more reliable. Just a thought. Stallion has proven his work here, to my knowledge, your friends have not.
Last edited by smusportspage on Wed Mar 25, 2015 9:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Losing some height next year but gaining some shootersI personally think posters SHOULD be called out for posting opinion as fact and I'm glad Stallion did just that.
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests |
|