SMU +37

by **Duke Blue Blood** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:37 pm

SMU +37 is the opening line...

by **Rebel10** » Sun Sep 13, 2015 11:44 pm

I wonder if they are going to try to beat us worse than Baylor so they can stay in front of Baylor in the rankings.

by **mrydel** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:18 am

They will score 100 if they can.

by **ponyboy** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:54 am

by **DanFreibergerForHeisman** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:54 am

We cover.

by **Pony Boss** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 7:57 am

SMU will cover. It will be a good game until it gets out of hand.

by **ojaipony** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 8:59 am

"covering" is "winning" this year. I'm with mrydel - I'd like to see us score 21+ points. We know our defense will give up quite a bit more. But hopefully under 60. :-)

(that really hurt to type BTW).

by **ponydawg** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 9:13 am

37....ghost of Doak....take the ponies!

by **West Coast Johnny** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:08 pm

Rebel10 wrote:I wonder if they are going to try to beat us worse than Baylor so they can stay in front of Baylor in the rankings.

We'll try to destroy you... so said by every football team versus any other football team.

by **LA_Mustang** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:13 pm

I never predict the score of our football games but we will cover against the froggies.

by **blackoutpony** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:15 pm

49-17 would be nice and should shrug "meh, alright" worthy. Hell, anything better than 56-0 will be an improvement

by **1983 Cotton Bowl** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 12:44 pm

I don't see us scoring much at all. Baylor's defense had the disadvantage at the get-go of seeing the Morris offense at SMU for the very first time, with several players (Sutton, etc.) that they hadn't seen before. Once they got through the first few possessions and made adjustments, they shut our offense down.

GP, on the other hand, has two games worth of tape on us. He won't be surprised by anything.

by **smusic 00** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:14 pm

We have tape on ourselves now, too, which should help a lot. QBMD is on a steep upcurve.

by **blackoutpony** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:23 pm

1983 Cotton Bowl wrote:I don't see us scoring much at all. Baylor's defense had the disadvantage at the get-go of seeing the Morris offense at SMU for the very first time, with several players (Sutton, etc.) that they hadn't seen before. Once they got through the first few possessions and made adjustments, they shut our offense down.

GP, on the other hand, has two games worth of tape on us. He won't be surprised by anything.

Baylor also gave up 31 to Lamar, so maybe their defense really isn't very good....

by **Stallion** » Mon Sep 14, 2015 1:25 pm

I don't see why SMU can't score on TCU. Seriously, TCU doesn't have hardly any healthy starters on defense returning from 2014. I think there are only 1 or 2 returning healthy starter remaining from last year. That's a brand new defense out there

SMU +37

SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Re: SMU +37

Who is online