|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by geno » Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:10 pm
BUS wrote:They did all they could do to not score and worked to run out the clock.
I have two issues. Offensive pass interference on the pass for TD. REALLY a no call with the ref right there.
And two, On our fourth down play the d-back turned out guy sideways and could not catch the pass..... Well... no call again.
We are getting better. YEAH.
Penalties called against TCU--115 yards. Penalties called against SMU--39 yards
-
geno

-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Ft Worth TX USA
by geno » Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:12 pm
stc9 wrote:If I was GP, I would have taken a knee. I don't think the 56 vs. 49 points are optically that much better. He has a lot of injuries right now. He could have ended the game with almost zero further contact for his players. That has to start being a consideration for him.
If you were GP, TCU would have been 50 points behind.
-
geno

-
- Posts: 193
- Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: Ft Worth TX USA
by Stallion » Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:14 pm
That's because TCU's DBs were interfering with SMU receiver every deep ball and SMU's DBs were running 5 yards behind TCU's receivers. When we get some DBs that can close up the 5 yard gap then penalties may even out
Last edited by Stallion on Sun Sep 20, 2015 6:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by PonySnob » Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:39 pm
Stallion wrote:That's because TCU's receivers were interfering with SMU receiver every deep ball and SMU's DBs were running 5 yards behind TCU's receivers. When we get some receivers that can close up the 5 yard gap then penalties may even out
How where TCU's receivers interfering with the SMU receivers? Wouldn't we want a 5 yard gap for our receivers? Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Stallion » Sun Sep 20, 2015 4:42 pm
Oh meant DBs. Its was a joke-you got to be in the vicinity to interfere
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by PonySnob » Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:54 pm
Stallion wrote:Oh meant DBs. Its was a joke-you got to be in the vicinity to interfere
I was just busting balls with that.
Peruna is my mascot!
-

PonySnob

-
- Posts: 11516
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Oldmins » Sun Sep 20, 2015 5:58 pm
jpe747 wrote:Whether TCU should have scored or not at the end I'm sure it will be remembered and make the win next year that much more fulfilling! As for the missed calls, it looked to me like the officials let TCU play a rough game. I thought there could have been an offensive interference call or two also. It seems that TCU always plays out on the ledge and tests the officials throughout the game. I think that is just part of their game.
Did you notice that the officials, who "let TCU play a rough game" penalized TCU 115 yards, and SMU only 39?? Maybe you didn't notice that.
-
Oldmins

-
- Posts: 435
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 11:07 am
by Charleston Pony » Sun Sep 20, 2015 6:28 pm
Oldmins wrote:jpe747 wrote:Whether TCU should have scored or not at the end I'm sure it will be remembered and make the win next year that much more fulfilling! As for the missed calls, it looked to me like the officials let TCU play a rough game. I thought there could have been an offensive interference call or two also. It seems that TCU always plays out on the ledge and tests the officials throughout the game. I think that is just part of their game.
Did you notice that the officials, who "let TCU play a rough game" penalized TCU 115 yards, and SMU only 39?? Maybe you didn't notice that.
reading comprehension issue?
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28930
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by jpe747 » Sun Sep 20, 2015 7:19 pm
Oldmins wrote:jpe747 wrote:Whether TCU should have scored or not at the end I'm sure it will be remembered and make the win next year that much more fulfilling! As for the missed calls, it looked to me like the officials let TCU play a rough game. I thought there could have been an offensive interference call or two also. It seems that TCU always plays out on the ledge and tests the officials throughout the game. I think that is just part of their game.
Did you notice that the officials, who "let TCU play a rough game" penalized TCU 115 yards, and SMU only 39?? Maybe you didn't notice that.
Yes I did notice. I take it from your response that you agree with me. 
-

jpe747

-
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2011 6:07 pm
by West Coast Johnny » Sun Sep 20, 2015 8:12 pm
Perhaps a good hearty breakfast will make you feel better about the whole - running up the score thing. 
-
West Coast Johnny

-
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:30 pm
by ponyscott » Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:33 pm
Didn't have an issue with it...stop them. Rankings and point difference count...just hope we have that problem soon as well.
-

ponyscott

-
- Posts: 7033
- Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 12:47 pm
by Rebel10 » Sun Sep 20, 2015 9:38 pm
TCU may have wanted to keep up with Baylor in points scored for the CFP. Baylor scored 56 and TCU scored 56. Who knows. But it is not like we were down 40 points and they scored. Some need to stop acting rich entitled brats about this.
#HammerDown
-
Rebel10

-
- Posts: 12534
- Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests
|
|