SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
Comparable season ticket sales for regional rivals:
TCU
2009: 13,000
2010: 19,500
2011: 22,500
2012: 30,000
2013: 31.636
http://www.frogsowar.com/2013/8/8/46013 ... -season-is
Baylor
2013: 23,564
2012: 17,320
2011: 16,830
2010: 12,849
2009: 12,362
http://m.wacotrib.com/news/higher_educa ... l?mode=jqm
SMU seems to be at around 10k right now after a 1-11 season. Notice TCU entered Big 12 in 2012. They jumped their ticket sales from 2009-2010 after the Fiesta Bowl year, while in Mountain West.
Baylor sales jumped after RG3 gave em home in 2010.
TCU
2009: 13,000
2010: 19,500
2011: 22,500
2012: 30,000
2013: 31.636
http://www.frogsowar.com/2013/8/8/46013 ... -season-is
Baylor
2013: 23,564
2012: 17,320
2011: 16,830
2010: 12,849
2009: 12,362
http://m.wacotrib.com/news/higher_educa ... l?mode=jqm
SMU seems to be at around 10k right now after a 1-11 season. Notice TCU entered Big 12 in 2012. They jumped their ticket sales from 2009-2010 after the Fiesta Bowl year, while in Mountain West.
Baylor sales jumped after RG3 gave em home in 2010.
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
9300 to be more exact
- LA_Mustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 15604
- Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: El Porto, CA 90266
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
Goals:
2016: 12,000
2017: 16,000
2018: 20,000
2016: 12,000
2017: 16,000
2018: 20,000
SMU-12 NCAA appearances, 1 Final Four
2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs

2014-15 & 2016-17 AAC Men's Basketball Champs
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
I understand Texas would play SMU in Austin, but will not schedule
a home & home with us now, so no deal.
a home & home with us now, so no deal.
-
- Junior Varsity
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 9:46 pm
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
Hopefully we find a way to make it happen every year (or most years if every year doesn't work).
The numbers for the three schools make the case even more compelling for an annual meeting for all three...
TCU vs SMU: 48-40-7 (TCU)
Baylor vs SMU: 38-36-7 (BU)
Baylor vs TCU: 52-51-7 (BU)
Instead of the Commander-in-Chief's Trophy it could be the Battle for the BMW Keys.
I wouldn't mind seeing some hoops in Moody while we are at it.
The numbers for the three schools make the case even more compelling for an annual meeting for all three...
TCU vs SMU: 48-40-7 (TCU)
Baylor vs SMU: 38-36-7 (BU)
Baylor vs TCU: 52-51-7 (BU)
Instead of the Commander-in-Chief's Trophy it could be the Battle for the BMW Keys.
I wouldn't mind seeing some hoops in Moody while we are at it.
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
JasonB wrote:No, us "Schedule Wimps" don't think we should add A&M and another P5 team on top of Baylor and TCU, that is all... The perfect OOC schedule is one easy game, and then a game against either the MWC or MAC to establish G5 conference superiority, and then Baylor and TCU.
The perfect OOC schedule is us versus every Texas P5 we can get. We should only play MWC or MAC teams in bowl games.
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
-Benjamin Franklin
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
BaylorHistory wrote:Hopefully we find a way to make it happen every year (or most years if every year doesn't work).
The numbers for the three schools make the case even more compelling for an annual meeting for all three...
TCU vs SMU: 48-40-7 (TCU)
Baylor vs SMU: 38-36-7 (BU)
Baylor vs TCU: 52-51-7 (BU)
Instead of the Commander-in-Chief's Trophy it could be the Battle for the BMW Keys.
I wouldn't mind seeing some hoops in Moody while we are at it.
Battle for the Bible Belt
They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security
-Benjamin Franklin
-Benjamin Franklin
-
- All-American
- Posts: 548
- Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 4:30 pm
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
Why would SMU want to play a classless university with a classless coach like Fatterson, in an ugly city like fort worth on an ugly campus with [deleted] yellow brick buildings?
- smupony94
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
We are gluttons for punishment
- East Coast Mustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7434
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
West Coast Johnny wrote:Why would SMU want to play a classless university with a classless coach like Fatterson, in an ugly city like fort worth on an ugly campus with [deleted] yellow brick buildings?
TCU's campus reminds me of a Communist Bloc neighborhood
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
West Coast Johnny wrote:Why would SMU want to play a classless university with a classless coach like Fatterson, in an ugly city like fort worth on an ugly campus with [deleted] yellow brick buildings?
Battle For the Keystone Keg
- PerunaPunch
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2686
- Joined: Wed Jul 05, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX, USA
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
I'd like to see some consistency in order to build/rebuild some regional rivalry games that will draw interest from Metroplex fans (as opposed to die-hard PonyFans). Realizing that the quality of EVERY team ebbs and flows, our problem is that we scheduled the likes of TAMU, OSU and Baylor when they were middle of the road, and then by the time we played them, they were very good.
For out-of-conference, I'd like to see TCU, UNT and Baylor every year. UT would be on my wish list for the #4 spot, but they will never play us in D/FW as they have nothing to gain (to date, they have recruited D/FW better than we do) and everything to lose (status, bragging rights, etc.).
If we could fill Ford with our own fans, a logical choice for a 4th team would be Rice, but that wouldn't bring us much besides a good chance of going 2-2 OOC. I hate TTech, and don't want them fouling up our nice stadium.
For out-of-conference, I'd like to see TCU, UNT and Baylor every year. UT would be on my wish list for the #4 spot, but they will never play us in D/FW as they have nothing to gain (to date, they have recruited D/FW better than we do) and everything to lose (status, bragging rights, etc.).
If we could fill Ford with our own fans, a logical choice for a 4th team would be Rice, but that wouldn't bring us much besides a good chance of going 2-2 OOC. I hate TTech, and don't want them fouling up our nice stadium.
"It's a couple hundred million dollars. I'm not losing sleep over it." -- David Miller
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 386
- Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2004 1:24 pm
- Location: Rolling Hills Estates, CA
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
Given our West Coast Alumni Base, we need to schedule UCLA at the Rose Bowl or USC
We need to schedule UCLA in Basketball too
We need to schedule UCLA in Basketball too
- Bergermeister
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7132
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: University Park
Re: SMU working to renew Baylor, TCU series
West Coast Johnny wrote:Why would SMU want to play a classless university with a classless coach like Fatterson, in an ugly city like fort worth on an ugly campus with [deleted] yellow brick buildings?
Tradition.