JMU was also faster than SMU
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
JMU was also faster than SMU
People where I was sitting noticed and even made comments on how they were faster than SMU.
#HammerDown
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
Most noticeable on qb draws. We knew it was coming and they knew we knew, and the guy still made our D look stuck in mud. The multiple gashes up the dead middle were a brutal combo of ineptitude on our part and a pure speed gap.
We'll flush out the deadweight we can and next season we'll forget about this crap, as emasculating as this was today.
We'll flush out the deadweight we can and next season we'll forget about this crap, as emasculating as this was today.
Usually, the team that scores the most points wins the game - John Madden
- LakeHighlandsPony
- Hall of Famer
- Posts: 2558
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
- Location: The Boneyard
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
And they tackle much better than we do.
- mrydel
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 32038
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-
- All-American
- Posts: 844
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2012 2:41 am
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
Showed when their wideout beat our guy on a streak for a td in the third quarter. Beat him by five yards
SMU Class of 2014
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
mrydel wrote:What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel
Truth!
-
- Varsity
- Posts: 301
- Joined: Sat Oct 26, 2013 10:18 pm
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
Fresno Mustang wrote:Showed when their wideout beat our guy on a streak for a td in the third quarter. Beat him by five yards
Our guy gave up on the play. It wasn't a speed issue. Their offensive coaches out-coached our defensive coaches. But even if the coaching was even, our defense is not talented enough to stop a good offense. We may have to score 50 points a game to win any more this year.
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
LakeHighlandsPony wrote:And they tackle much better than we do.
I did a back of the envelope count last night on missed tackles. If we got a hand on the ball carrier and didn't bring him down I counted it. This doesn't take into account players being in the wrong place and didn't have a chance to make the tackle, nor does it take into account that it would have been a tough tackle to make anyway. Just somebody laid a hand on the ball carrier and failed to bring him down (didn't count Special Teams). Using this criteria we missed 32 tackles last night.
Some rise by sin, and some by virtue fall
-
- All-American
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:25 pm
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
stc9 wrote:LakeHighlandsPony wrote:And they tackle much better than we do.
I did a back of the envelope count last night on missed tackles. If we got a hand on the ball carrier and didn't bring him down I counted it. This doesn't take into account players being in the wrong place and didn't have a chance to make the tackle, nor does it take into account that it would have been a tough tackle to make anyway. Just somebody laid a hand on the ball carrier and failed to bring him down (didn't count Special Teams). Using this criteria we missed 32 tackles last night.
Wow. That'sthe only word I have for that stat
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
stc9 wrote:LakeHighlandsPony wrote:And they tackle much better than we do.
I did a back of the envelope count last night on missed tackles. If we got a hand on the ball carrier and didn't bring him down I counted it. This doesn't take into account players being in the wrong place and didn't have a chance to make the tackle, nor does it take into account that it would have been a tough tackle to make anyway. Just somebody laid a hand on the ball carrier and failed to bring him down (didn't count Special Teams). Using this criteria we missed 32 tackles last night.
Was that 1st or 2nd half?
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
"Either you have speed or you are chasing it." We chased some yesterday.
#HammerDown
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
mrydel wrote:What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel
Tackling was so bad...so many missed tackles....I would like to see their yard after contact vs. total rushing yards.
#Beat Clemson
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
I dunno-I'm not sure we laid a finger on the QB on his jaunts through the heart of the SMU Defense
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
-
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7234
- Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Allen, Tx, USA
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
ftworthmustang wrote:Fresno Mustang wrote:Showed when their wideout beat our guy on a streak for a td in the third quarter. Beat him by five yards
Our guy gave up on the play. It wasn't a speed issue. Their offensive coaches out-coached our defensive coaches. But even if the coaching was even, our defense is not talented enough to stop a good offense. We may have to score 50 points a game to win any more this year.
We were horrible, no doubt. But to be fair that was 6, who normally starts for us. He didn't last night, and we put him in as a desperate attempt to stop something. He was obviously injured and pulled up lame on that play and I don't think he played again. 18 Played the rest of the game at corner. I think it was after 4 got hurt on the punt return.
-
- All-American
- Posts: 993
- Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2014 11:25 pm
Re: JMU was also faster than SMU
JoeKidd wrote:mrydel wrote:What we are doing right now cannot be classified as tackling, or even an attempt at such. Need a lot of improvement both in technique and personnel
Tackling was so bad...so many missed tackles....I would like to see their yard after contact vs. total rushing yards.
Probably balances out. There were plenty of rushes up the middle where Lee was untouched for 15 yards