|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by that's great raplh » Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:21 pm
it is still very easy to get into smu - no matter how you slice it
michigan is a very hard school to get into
so is florida
so is texas
but they get some players from jucos who always make a diff
two words for all you doubters - adrian haywood
-

that's great raplh

-
- Posts: 6362
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: bottom of a sewer
by that's great raplh » Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:26 pm
what smu needs to do is spin it differently
if they lose credits, they will just need to make them up and we'll pay for it
in the end - they will be holding a very valuable piece of paper - an SMU Degree
i went to smu - i went to Cox and now i work on wall street and i make more than most pro atheletes
-

that's great raplh

-
- Posts: 6362
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: bottom of a sewer
by SWC2010 » Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:11 am
EastStang wrote:Hey instead of fretting about all this, why don't we mine the fields of post grads from elite military schools? Fork Union Academy has two Heisman winners. That's more than most high schools in the Country. They clearly recruit and give scholarships to kids who need some discipline and one-on-one academic help. Ohio State seems to have a pipeline to these schools. We got one last year, we need to keep that pipeline open.
-----------
Good idea, on pursuiing the Preps.
Of course, we may have blown that Fork Union 'pipeline'.
Didn't we run that kid off last semester?
-
SWC2010

-
- Posts: 1220
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:01 pm
- Location: TEXAS
by PhirePhilBennett » Thu Dec 29, 2005 2:19 am
that's great raplh wrote:it is still very easy to get into smu - no matter how you slice it
michigan is a very hard school to get into
UNLESS YOU ARE AN ATHLETE
so is florida
WRONG MY FRIEND, FLA IS NOT HARD
so is texas
TX HAS THAT TOP10% ACTION - ALLOWS MANY PEOPLE THAT WOULDn"T OTHERWISE BE QUALIFIED, and EXCLUDES MANY HIGHLY RANKED HS GRADUATES THAT ATTEND TOP-TIERED HS LIKE PRIVATES
but they get some players from jucos who always make a diff
two words for all you doubters - adrian haywood
-
PhirePhilBennett
-
by friarwolf » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:07 am
smu is not the piece of cake to get into that it once was. record early applications this year, lots of kids with 1200 sat's flat getting rejected or deferred.
-
friarwolf

-
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am
by EastStang » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:31 am
Sure SMU is easier to get into than Duke, Rice, Stanford, Northwestern and certainly easier than Michigan or UVA. I suspect that any SMU admittee would be accepted at virtually any state school in their home state (with some notable exceptions like, William and Mary, UVA, Michigan, Cal-Berkeley). There was a book out several years ago called public Ivy's. It listed about 25 public schools with Ivy League reputations (With schools like those mentioned above). I would put all of them ahead of SMU in difficulty of admission. Statistics are whatever you want them to be.
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12659
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by PhirePhilBennett » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:02 am
EastStang wrote:Sure SMU is easier to get into than Duke, Rice, Stanford, Northwestern and certainly easier than Michigan or UVA. I suspect that any SMU admittee would be accepted at virtually any state school in their home state (with some notable exceptions like, William and Mary, UVA, Michigan, Cal-Berkeley). There was a book out several years ago called public Ivy's. It listed about 25 public schools with Ivy League reputations (With schools like those mentioned above). I would put all of them ahead of SMU in difficulty of admission. Statistics are whatever you want them to be.
Agreed. And most of those public schools have nice 'easy' degree tracks as well for their athletes and (lower qualified) legacies as well.
-
PhirePhilBennett
-
by SMU Football Blog » Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:19 pm
friarwolf wrote:smu is not the piece of cake to get into that it once was. record early applications this year, lots of kids with 1200 sat's flat getting rejected or deferred.
Sorry, but I doubt that.
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by couch 'em » Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:44 pm
I doubt the situation has changed much from when I got to SMU. (2001) The question was not if you could get into SMU, but how much scholarship they gave you. SMU is very easy to get into. Not easy like UT Arlington or Sol Ross or Prarie View or other "schools" like that...... but when we are talking about UT, A&M, etc, if you are not in the top 10% of your HS class then SMU is far easier to get into.
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
by friarwolf » Fri Dec 30, 2005 10:14 am
Blogger. It is true. SMU has become the "flavor of the month" this year. Dallas kids have decided SMU is cool with the Mockingbird Station area as well as all the capital improvements SMU has made. I know of 3 kids with sat's of 1200 that flat got rejection letters 2 weeks ago. Early applications are up over 40%.
-
friarwolf

-
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am
by that's great raplh » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:36 pm
that helps all of us - we need to be more selective for regular students
-

that's great raplh

-
- Posts: 6362
- Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
- Location: bottom of a sewer
by tmustangp » Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:37 am
[quote=
If you went to SMU, did you bother applying to Harvard? Not likely. But you probably applied to Tx or aTm as well as SMU. Same ballpark.quote]
you have to be kidding me.. you think smu is in the same ball park at UT and A&M as far as entrance requirements...
I got into smu 5 years ago and I didn't even bother to apply to UT or A&M, I was smart enough to know I didn't stand a chance.. you basically have to be top 10% to get into those schools or do the summer school program that is really hard
-

tmustangp

-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: dallas,tx,us
-
by gostangs » Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:03 am
True about UT - but not A&M - A&M is no harder to get into then SMU. he percentage of their classes made up of the 10%'ers is much smaller then UT's and therfore not as much of a factor.
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by Ponymon » Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:28 pm
I know of several parents that have pulled their kids out of St Marks and Greenhill and enrolled them in small public schools outside of the Metroplex so that they will qualify under the 10% rule. The 10% rule was put in to allow entrance for more minorities from the inner city. This rule has probably hurt UT more than helped as far as attracting top students with high SAT scores.
-

Ponymon

-
- Posts: 3220
- Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Farmer Branch, Texas
by tmustangp » Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:44 pm
gostangs wrote:True about UT - but not A&M - A&M is no harder to get into then SMU. he percentage of their classes made up of the 10%'ers is much smaller then UT's and therfore not as much of a factor.
i just talked to my friends who graduated from A&M and have siblings at the school right now.. they say A&M is just as hard to get into as ut
-

tmustangp

-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: dallas,tx,us
-
Return to Recruiting
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
|
|