PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

smu academic requirements are a joke

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Postby that's great raplh » Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:21 pm

it is still very easy to get into smu - no matter how you slice it

michigan is a very hard school to get into

so is florida

so is texas

but they get some players from jucos who always make a diff

two words for all you doubters - adrian haywood
User avatar
that's great raplh
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
Location: bottom of a sewer

Postby that's great raplh » Wed Dec 28, 2005 8:26 pm

what smu needs to do is spin it differently

if they lose credits, they will just need to make them up and we'll pay for it

in the end - they will be holding a very valuable piece of paper - an SMU Degree

i went to smu - i went to Cox and now i work on wall street and i make more than most pro atheletes
User avatar
that's great raplh
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
Location: bottom of a sewer

Postby SWC2010 » Thu Dec 29, 2005 1:11 am

EastStang wrote:Hey instead of fretting about all this, why don't we mine the fields of post grads from elite military schools? Fork Union Academy has two Heisman winners. That's more than most high schools in the Country. They clearly recruit and give scholarships to kids who need some discipline and one-on-one academic help. Ohio State seems to have a pipeline to these schools. We got one last year, we need to keep that pipeline open.

-----------

Good idea, on pursuiing the Preps.

Of course, we may have blown that Fork Union 'pipeline'.

Didn't we run that kid off last semester?
SWC2010
Heisman
 
Posts: 1220
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2004 11:01 pm
Location: TEXAS

Postby PhirePhilBennett » Thu Dec 29, 2005 2:19 am

that's great raplh wrote:it is still very easy to get into smu - no matter how you slice it

michigan is a very hard school to get into

UNLESS YOU ARE AN ATHLETE

so is florida

WRONG MY FRIEND, FLA IS NOT HARD

so is texas

TX HAS THAT TOP10% ACTION - ALLOWS MANY PEOPLE THAT WOULDn"T OTHERWISE BE QUALIFIED, and EXCLUDES MANY HIGHLY RANKED HS GRADUATES THAT ATTEND TOP-TIERED HS LIKE PRIVATES

but they get some players from jucos who always make a diff

two words for all you doubters - adrian haywood
PhirePhilBennett
 

Postby friarwolf » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:07 am

smu is not the piece of cake to get into that it once was. record early applications this year, lots of kids with 1200 sat's flat getting rejected or deferred.
friarwolf
Heisman
 
Posts: 1964
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am

Postby EastStang » Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:31 am

Sure SMU is easier to get into than Duke, Rice, Stanford, Northwestern and certainly easier than Michigan or UVA. I suspect that any SMU admittee would be accepted at virtually any state school in their home state (with some notable exceptions like, William and Mary, UVA, Michigan, Cal-Berkeley). There was a book out several years ago called public Ivy's. It listed about 25 public schools with Ivy League reputations (With schools like those mentioned above). I would put all of them ahead of SMU in difficulty of admission. Statistics are whatever you want them to be.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12659
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby PhirePhilBennett » Thu Dec 29, 2005 11:02 am

EastStang wrote:Sure SMU is easier to get into than Duke, Rice, Stanford, Northwestern and certainly easier than Michigan or UVA. I suspect that any SMU admittee would be accepted at virtually any state school in their home state (with some notable exceptions like, William and Mary, UVA, Michigan, Cal-Berkeley). There was a book out several years ago called public Ivy's. It listed about 25 public schools with Ivy League reputations (With schools like those mentioned above). I would put all of them ahead of SMU in difficulty of admission. Statistics are whatever you want them to be.


Agreed. And most of those public schools have nice 'easy' degree tracks as well for their athletes and (lower qualified) legacies as well.
PhirePhilBennett
 

Postby SMU Football Blog » Thu Dec 29, 2005 12:19 pm

friarwolf wrote:smu is not the piece of cake to get into that it once was. record early applications this year, lots of kids with 1200 sat's flat getting rejected or deferred.


Sorry, but I doubt that.
User avatar
SMU Football Blog
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4418
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
Location: North Dallas, Texas

Postby couch 'em » Thu Dec 29, 2005 6:44 pm

I doubt the situation has changed much from when I got to SMU. (2001) The question was not if you could get into SMU, but how much scholarship they gave you. SMU is very easy to get into. Not easy like UT Arlington or Sol Ross or Prarie View or other "schools" like that...... but when we are talking about UT, A&M, etc, if you are not in the top 10% of your HS class then SMU is far easier to get into.
User avatar
couch 'em
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 9758
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Farmers Branch

Postby friarwolf » Fri Dec 30, 2005 10:14 am

Blogger. It is true. SMU has become the "flavor of the month" this year. Dallas kids have decided SMU is cool with the Mockingbird Station area as well as all the capital improvements SMU has made. I know of 3 kids with sat's of 1200 that flat got rejection letters 2 weeks ago. Early applications are up over 40%.
friarwolf
Heisman
 
Posts: 1964
Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am

Postby that's great raplh » Fri Dec 30, 2005 8:36 pm

that helps all of us - we need to be more selective for regular students
User avatar
that's great raplh
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6362
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2003 3:01 am
Location: bottom of a sewer

Re: smu academic requirements are a joke

Postby tmustangp » Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:37 am

[quote=

If you went to SMU, did you bother applying to Harvard? Not likely. But you probably applied to Tx or aTm as well as SMU. Same ballpark.quote]

you have to be kidding me.. you think smu is in the same ball park at UT and A&M as far as entrance requirements...

I got into smu 5 years ago and I didn't even bother to apply to UT or A&M, I was smart enough to know I didn't stand a chance.. you basically have to be top 10% to get into those schools or do the summer school program that is really hard
User avatar
tmustangp
All-American
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 4:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,us

Postby gostangs » Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:03 am

True about UT - but not A&M - A&M is no harder to get into then SMU. he percentage of their classes made up of the 10%'ers is much smaller then UT's and therfore not as much of a factor.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Postby Ponymon » Sun Jan 01, 2006 1:28 pm

I know of several parents that have pulled their kids out of St Marks and Greenhill and enrolled them in small public schools outside of the Metroplex so that they will qualify under the 10% rule. The 10% rule was put in to allow entrance for more minorities from the inner city. This rule has probably hurt UT more than helped as far as attracting top students with high SAT scores.
User avatar
Ponymon
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3220
Joined: Wed Aug 23, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Farmer Branch, Texas

Postby tmustangp » Sun Jan 01, 2006 11:44 pm

gostangs wrote:True about UT - but not A&M - A&M is no harder to get into then SMU. he percentage of their classes made up of the 10%'ers is much smaller then UT's and therfore not as much of a factor.


i just talked to my friends who graduated from A&M and have siblings at the school right now.. they say A&M is just as hard to get into as ut
User avatar
tmustangp
All-American
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sun Dec 29, 2002 4:01 am
Location: dallas,tx,us

PreviousNext

Return to Recruiting

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests