mrydel wrote: Think I would rather be a 6.
Mrs. Mrydel said that ship has sailed.
|
2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadModerators: PonyPride, SmooPower Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Mrs. Mrydel said that ship has sailed.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadThat is regrettably true
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadI suggest you buy candles-I've seen 4s go to 6 1/2 in good candle-light
"With a quarter of a tank of gas, we can get everything we need right here in DFW." -SMU Head Coach Chad Morris
When momentum starts rolling downhill in recruiting-WATCH OUT.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadMoney is good for at least a +2
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadI really hope y'all are talking about on a scale of 1-10
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread![]() This is the best seed Last edited by One Trick Pony on Tue Feb 28, 2017 4:08 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
actually 1 - 6.5
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Threadwhatever our seed, I'd rather play a P5 school than one of these teams. One of them will probably win a 5/12 game but of course SMU, Cincy or any P5 school will be expected to dispatch them easily
http://www.cbssports.com/college-basket ... to-strike/
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadUCONN a measly -2 over ECU sums up their season.
Pulling for ECU for entertainment value. The Boneyard will break the internet if Huskies lose.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Agree - a team like Belmont would be a disaster. Their offense is all about moving the ball around, shooting the outside shot and draining three pointers. And they are quite good in that department. Any three-point bombing team would be dangerous for us. I want the team that wants to drive to the basket. We will cut off their lanes with our defense (which most teams are not used to seeing) and it will be Game Over. "Moral Victories Make Me Sick" - TR
![]()
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadA high seed power conference opponent is a flawed slightly above average team from a good conference. A higher seed small school is a good team from a small conference. Pretty obvious which of those two are more dangerous.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
I agree with this for the most part. Caveat is if you draw someone like Syracuse or Mich St. who is surging at the right time and is loaded with talent, unlike a team like Belmont, UTA, or Vermont. Belmont despite being a good 3 point shooting team I dont think has the horses to hang with our starting 5, which is why the almost always lose in the 1st round. Like Vermont is better or at least equal to Belmont and lost to UH earlier this year. I do mostly agree though that I would much rather play Vandy, KSU, Providence, Seton Hall, or someone like that rather than Belmont or Mid Tennessee who is a small school who is playing good basketball.
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadJust tell me where and when....we'll deal with the "who."
Party at The Wopper!
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology ThreadWow.... Houston just climbed into Lunardi's last four out.... as last.
Progress!! Party at The Wopper!
Re: 2016-2017 Bracketology Thread
Wow. Even more reason to hope they beat Cincinnati tomorrow night!!!! Shake It Off Moody
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests |
|