Jane Doe v. SMU Civil Lawsuit

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
PonyTime
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3985
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2002 4:01 am
Location: The Green Elephant

Re: Jane Doe v. SMU Civil Lawsuit

Post by PonyTime »

ponyboy wrote:http://www.ponyfans.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=88872


That explains why I missed it - Confused the "Very Disappointed" thread with the "Disappointed" thread - Thought that thread was all political and stopped reading it. Mods can delete this thread if they want.
"Moral Victories Make Me Sick" - TR

Image
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Really disappointed!

Post by EastStang »

When I was at SMU, if a crime was committed on campus, the UP Police handled it. During the "streaking" period, they called in DPD for help. So, if there was a "rape", why wasn't it handled by UP Police? I understand there may be student punishment as well, but if a cisgendered person was raped, then the perpetrator should be spending some time in prison. Now, if the UP Police investigated and determined there was insufficient proof to charge, then there might be university involvement. But if was advising someone accused of rape or making a rape accusation, I'd say, don't cooperate with the University because whatever you say, can be used against you.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
User avatar
DanFreibergerForHeisman
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 16486
Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
Contact:

Re: Really disappointed!

Post by DanFreibergerForHeisman »

Beyond the bigger issue of the alleged crime against the cisgendered female, it sounds like SMU could be in some potential Title IX hot water - which wouldn't be the first time unfortunately.
Shake It Off Moody
User avatar
mustangxc
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 7339
Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Re: Really disappointed!

Post by mustangxc »

EastStang wrote:When I was at SMU, if a crime was committed on campus, the UP Police handled it. During the "streaking" period, they called in DPD for help. So, if there was a "rape", why wasn't it handled by UP Police? I understand there may be student punishment as well, but if a cisgendered person was raped, then the perpetrator should be spending some time in prison. Now, if the UP Police investigated and determined there was insufficient proof to charge, then there might be university involvement. But if was advising someone accused of rape or making a rape accusation, I'd say, don't cooperate with the University because whatever you say, can be used against you.

Does it matter whether the person is trans or cis? Regardless of how you may feel about gender, rape is rape and the violator should be held accountable no matter who the victim is.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: Really disappointed!

Post by EastStang »

I personally don't care how the person identifies, I was simply going with the gender reported in the paper. I agree, rape is rape.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
mtrout
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2315
Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2016 9:36 pm

Re: Jane Doe v. SMU Civil Lawsuit

Post by mtrout »

Sad! If you get raped or assaulted you unfortunately have to go HAM and go through with instant reporting via the hospital or equivalent route otherwise who knows what resolution there will be.

Sad sad sad if these allegations are true and I have no reason to believe theyΓÇÖre not.
gostangs
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12315
Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, Texas USA

Re: Jane Doe v. SMU Civil Lawsuit

Post by gostangs »

mtrout wrote:Sad! If you get raped or assaulted you unfortunately have to go HAM and go through with instant reporting via the hospital or equivalent route otherwise who knows what resolution there will be.

Sad sad sad if these allegations are true and I have no reason to believe theyΓÇÖre not.


We also have no reason to believe they are. We just donΓÇÖt know. People make up things all the time, and there are tragic situations where it is true all the time. We shouldnΓÇÖt suppose we know either way.
User avatar
Arkpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6467
Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Little Rock, AR USA

Re: Jane Doe v. SMU Civil Lawsuit

Post by Arkpony »

ItΓÇÖs a plaintiffs complaint. Did you expect it to say SMU followed Title IX procedures correctly?
Long live Inez Perez!
smusportspage
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:00 pm

Re: Really disappointed!

Post by smusportspage »

DanFreibergerForHeisman wrote:
Mustang75 wrote:Why was the victim described as 'cisgendered'? Is there something to read between the lines?

I think it is a good idea for the media to be specific in order to avoid any prejudice or bias in the reader.

It also helps alleviate any confusion interpreting subsequent pronouns in the article.


So a reader is prejudiced or biased when seeing the word female? I guess my English classes were too long ago. Just got to love these days! LOL.
mr. pony
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4550
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:24 pm

Re: Really disappointed!

Post by mr. pony »

SoCal_Pony wrote:ΓÇ£The lawsuit alleges that the school didnΓÇÖt follow its own investigation policies.ΓÇ¥

This is a serious criminal offense, exactly what type of investigation was SMU responsible for? ShouldnΓÇÖt that be the responsibility of the the UPPD?

I see this over and over again. Guess what, Penn St, Baylor, SMU, the Catholic Church, etc etc etc....theyΓÇÖre all conflicted. They try to cover up and it only makes matters worse, including when the inevitable financial settlements occur.


Thanks for that, Know-It-All! Or is it Columbo?
Post Reply