|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by SoCal_Pony » Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:51 pm
Insane_Pony_Posse wrote:orguy wrote:tcwho is an SMU wannabee
What SMU football fan would not trade SMU football results with TCU football results over last 15 years?
25 years but whose counting
-

SoCal_Pony

-
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
by MustangStealth » Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:52 pm
redpony wrote:a few they might want to include- SDSU, SMU, FRESNO ST. and Navy, Army and Air Force. IMO adding the academies would bring fans. Those 6 plus the existing 4 would make a nice, compact conference with decent academics.
San Diego to New York is not compact
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by MustangStealth » Mon Aug 07, 2023 9:55 pm
orguy wrote: national imbroglio.
Didn't she sing "Torn"?
-

MustangStealth

-
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
by SmooTen » Mon Aug 07, 2023 10:58 pm
TCU Alum wrote:I am curious where this "TCU and the Big 12 blackballed us" comes from. TCU has been generally supportive of SMU as evidenced by the continued scheduling of football and basketball every year (or almost every year). Hop Sing gets it: The #1 thing that TCU did which SMU did not was make a concerted effort from the Board of Trustees to the Faculty, to Students, to Alums to support athletics with time, money, and planning. The commitment was felt in every sport. Until you understand that and match that focus, conference affiliation won't matter. I'm not casting stones here, just pointing out what worked in Ft Worth and what is different between our school and yours. Your alumni base needs to use whatever persuasion they have to get a better support model in place, and then good things can follow.
Agree with this completely. Fans don't stick around to support (many not all), Student section is gone by halftime and don't return, parking is a nightmare, and like every stadium the food/drinks are astronomical. This may have changed as I haven't been back in a couple of years, but until we invest HEAVILY in SUPPORTING the athletics, we'll never create the atmosphere that conferences look for. The boulevard is special though 
SMU took a chance on me. I'll never turn my back on it.
-

SmooTen

-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:34 am
- Location: Fort Campbell, KY
by Peruna88 » Mon Aug 07, 2023 11:44 pm
MustangStealth wrote:orguy wrote: national imbroglio.
Didn't she sing "Torn"?
A+ reply here. Bravo!
-

Peruna88

-
- Posts: 714
- Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas
-
by mustangxc » Mon Aug 07, 2023 11:47 pm
SmooTen wrote:TCU Alum wrote:I am curious where this "TCU and the Big 12 blackballed us" comes from. TCU has been generally supportive of SMU as evidenced by the continued scheduling of football and basketball every year (or almost every year). Hop Sing gets it: The #1 thing that TCU did which SMU did not was make a concerted effort from the Board of Trustees to the Faculty, to Students, to Alums to support athletics with time, money, and planning. The commitment was felt in every sport. Until you understand that and match that focus, conference affiliation won't matter. I'm not casting stones here, just pointing out what worked in Ft Worth and what is different between our school and yours. Your alumni base needs to use whatever persuasion they have to get a better support model in place, and then good things can follow.
Agree with this completely. Fans don't stick around to support (many not all), Student section is gone by halftime and don't return, parking is a nightmare, and like every stadium the food/drinks are astronomical. This may have changed as I haven't been back in a couple of years, but until we invest HEAVILY in SUPPORTING the athletics, we'll never create the atmosphere that conferences look for. The boulevard is special though 
Looks like you are part of the problem. SMU needs your support.
-

mustangxc

-
- Posts: 7338
- Joined: Tue Nov 14, 2006 3:57 pm
by SmooTen » Mon Aug 07, 2023 11:51 pm
mustangxc wrote:SmooTen wrote:TCU Alum wrote:I am curious where this "TCU and the Big 12 blackballed us" comes from. TCU has been generally supportive of SMU as evidenced by the continued scheduling of football and basketball every year (or almost every year). Hop Sing gets it: The #1 thing that TCU did which SMU did not was make a concerted effort from the Board of Trustees to the Faculty, to Students, to Alums to support athletics with time, money, and planning. The commitment was felt in every sport. Until you understand that and match that focus, conference affiliation won't matter. I'm not casting stones here, just pointing out what worked in Ft Worth and what is different between our school and yours. Your alumni base needs to use whatever persuasion they have to get a better support model in place, and then good things can follow.
Agree with this completely. Fans don't stick around to support (many not all), Student section is gone by halftime and don't return, parking is a nightmare, and like every stadium the food/drinks are astronomical. This may have changed as I haven't been back in a couple of years, but until we invest HEAVILY in SUPPORTING the athletics, we'll never create the atmosphere that conferences look for. The boulevard is special though 
Looks like you are part of the problem. SMU needs your support.
Unfortunately duty calls, so I cant. Otherwise I would. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SMU took a chance on me. I'll never turn my back on it.
-

SmooTen

-
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2010 11:34 am
- Location: Fort Campbell, KY
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 18 guests
|
|