25 years but whose countingInsane_Pony_Posse wrote:orguy wrote:tcwho is an SMU wannabee
What SMU football fan would not trade SMU football results with TCU football results over last 15 years?
SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
- SoCal_Pony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 5901
- Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
- MustangStealth
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
San Diego to New York is not compactredpony wrote:a few they might want to include- SDSU, SMU, FRESNO ST. and Navy, Army and Air Force. IMO adding the academies would bring fans. Those 6 plus the existing 4 would make a nice, compact conference with decent academics.
- MustangStealth
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 4093
- Joined: Thu Nov 15, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Ford Stadium, as often as possible
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
Didn't she sing "Torn"?orguy wrote: national imbroglio.
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
Agree with this completely. Fans don't stick around to support (many not all), Student section is gone by halftime and don't return, parking is a nightmare, and like every stadium the food/drinks are astronomical. This may have changed as I haven't been back in a couple of years, but until we invest HEAVILY in SUPPORTING the athletics, we'll never create the atmosphere that conferences look for.TCU Alum wrote:I am curious where this "TCU and the Big 12 blackballed us" comes from. TCU has been generally supportive of SMU as evidenced by the continued scheduling of football and basketball every year (or almost every year). Hop Sing gets it: The #1 thing that TCU did which SMU did not was make a concerted effort from the Board of Trustees to the Faculty, to Students, to Alums to support athletics with time, money, and planning. The commitment was felt in every sport. Until you understand that and match that focus, conference affiliation won't matter. I'm not casting stones here, just pointing out what worked in Ft Worth and what is different between our school and yours. Your alumni base needs to use whatever persuasion they have to get a better support model in place, and then good things can follow.
The boulevard is special though

SMU took a chance on me. I'll never turn my back on it.
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
A+ reply here. Bravo!MustangStealth wrote:Didn't she sing "Torn"?orguy wrote: national imbroglio.
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
Looks like you are part of the problem. SMU needs your support.SmooTen wrote:Agree with this completely. Fans don't stick around to support (many not all), Student section is gone by halftime and don't return, parking is a nightmare, and like every stadium the food/drinks are astronomical. This may have changed as I haven't been back in a couple of years, but until we invest HEAVILY in SUPPORTING the athletics, we'll never create the atmosphere that conferences look for.TCU Alum wrote:I am curious where this "TCU and the Big 12 blackballed us" comes from. TCU has been generally supportive of SMU as evidenced by the continued scheduling of football and basketball every year (or almost every year). Hop Sing gets it: The #1 thing that TCU did which SMU did not was make a concerted effort from the Board of Trustees to the Faculty, to Students, to Alums to support athletics with time, money, and planning. The commitment was felt in every sport. Until you understand that and match that focus, conference affiliation won't matter. I'm not casting stones here, just pointing out what worked in Ft Worth and what is different between our school and yours. Your alumni base needs to use whatever persuasion they have to get a better support model in place, and then good things can follow.
The boulevard is special though
Re: SMU Fan Thoughts On The Pac 12 After Today?
Unfortunately duty calls, so I cant. Otherwise I would.mustangxc wrote:Looks like you are part of the problem. SMU needs your support.SmooTen wrote:Agree with this completely. Fans don't stick around to support (many not all), Student section is gone by halftime and don't return, parking is a nightmare, and like every stadium the food/drinks are astronomical. This may have changed as I haven't been back in a couple of years, but until we invest HEAVILY in SUPPORTING the athletics, we'll never create the atmosphere that conferences look for.TCU Alum wrote:I am curious where this "TCU and the Big 12 blackballed us" comes from. TCU has been generally supportive of SMU as evidenced by the continued scheduling of football and basketball every year (or almost every year). Hop Sing gets it: The #1 thing that TCU did which SMU did not was make a concerted effort from the Board of Trustees to the Faculty, to Students, to Alums to support athletics with time, money, and planning. The commitment was felt in every sport. Until you understand that and match that focus, conference affiliation won't matter. I'm not casting stones here, just pointing out what worked in Ft Worth and what is different between our school and yours. Your alumni base needs to use whatever persuasion they have to get a better support model in place, and then good things can follow.
The boulevard is special though
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
SMU took a chance on me. I'll never turn my back on it.