|
Poll - SMU should . . . .Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
16 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Poll - SMU should . . . .There has been a lot of posts on what the Ponies should do, and we have not had a poll in quite a while, so here goes. I know I could have given other options but I wanted to keep it simple. I am leaning to option 1. Canzano is reporting in his mailbag that the PAC-4 have hired Oliver Luck to give them a game plan. He is also reporting SMU has been using Oliver Luck. If you do vote other, please give an explanation.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .Create or join a class action lawsuit against ESPN for creating monopolistic t bargaining conditions in an NCAA amateur sport.
May the forth be with us.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .Poor Kliavkoff. He's going get 10million+ over the next 3 years to do nothing. Well...he's basically been doing nothing the whole time it seems.
We need to hope Stanford doesn't get into a P4 conference then just go with them. I expect some sort of resolution before the season starts.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
In the PAC-4 scenario what Stanford wants — Stanford gets. (What do I know?!?). However it appears to me that if this scenario works, the key piece was the Old CUSA plan — get the service academies involved. Let them have huge leeway on income from media games. Think of the attendance factor for the SF, SD, Dallas area alone. The Academies solve academics. So it looks like this: Stanford Cal OSU WSU SDSU CSU SMU AF Navy Army Tulane Then ur pick USF, Memphis, Rice. BBall substitutes for Navy and Army - Gonzaga & Wichita State (or any other BBall school)
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .Two American Conference divisions, east and west. The Pac-4 plus the Texas and Oklahoma teams in the west. Everyone else in the east. Round robin in each division. Championship game between the winners of each division. ESPN linear coverage for everyone. Apple comes in and gets their foot in the door by broadcasting the Pac-4 in the daytime on Apple TV.
Could something like this happen? Aresco thinks it can. And with his connections, vision, and track record who would bet against him? Last edited by SMUstang on Sun Aug 13, 2023 3:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
I’m all in on this!
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
Stanford/Cal have a deep aversion to playing Boise. Unlikey this scenario is realized though stranger things have happened.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
OK. Do Mandel’s scenario but swap Colo St for Boise.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
That's a good swap.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
Read somewhere that Stanford and Cal also want nothing to do with San Jose State and Fresno State for academic reasons. PonyFans.com ... is really the premier place for Mustang talk on the Web.
— New York Times https://www.facebook.com/PonyFanscom/ twitter.com/PonyFans https://www.instagram.com/ponyfans_staff/ threads.com/ponyfans_staff
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .There is no reason to involve any MWC team at all. They bring nothing but the Mountain Time Zone which we don’t need. They only complicate the issue. What needs to happen ASAP is to get the PAC-4 into a conference with national linear media rights beyond 2024. Big markets and good competition would be a plus too.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .Sorry but my thoughts don’t jive with the party line on here.
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .
Stanford and Cal in a conference/division with North Texas State? C-ya @ Milos!
Re: Poll - SMU should . . . .AAC-PAC Merger P5?
WEST [9] STANFORD CAL RICE SMU TULANE OR-ST WA-ST SDSU NAVY EAST [9] UNT UTSA TULSA MEMPHIS USF FAU TEMPLE ECU UAB If the the AAC & PAC merge, can they hold onto power status and does this allow Stanford to play Eastern teams less often reducing travel and negative association?
16 posts
• Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Who is onlineUsers browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests |
|