CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
Dukie
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by Dukie »

User avatar
leopold
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4112
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Columbia, SC

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by leopold »

We are in arguably our first year of any real success. We can't get 30k to a football game, our basketball team is mediocre and we have no real measured brand value. All it takes is for free agency to wipe out anything we've accomplished this year. It's understandable.
User avatar
Drum Major
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:56 am
Location: North Richland Hills, TX

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by Drum Major »

Maybe they changed their mind. The link seems to be dead.
Dukie
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by Dukie »

Drum Major wrote:Maybe they changed their mind. The link seems to be dead.

Relinking:

https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/12/19/college-sports-programs-valuations.html
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by EastStang »

Weird ratings. Stanford is behind Clemson, but ahead of FSU, Duke, etc. UNC is way down the list. We're at the bottom but have the lowest revenue, duh. We are foregoing $20+ Million a year in TV revenue. Stanford surprises me. FSU is looking stupider and stupider every week.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
User avatar
SMU Pom Mom
All-American
All-American
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by SMU Pom Mom »

We are in the midst of a 1.3B sports facilities upgrade but apparently that does not add value to the program. Stupid list, just ignore.
Dukie
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2299
Joined: Fri Apr 14, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Austin, Texas

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by Dukie »

SMU Pom Mom wrote:We are in the midst of a 1.3B sports facilities upgrade but apparently that does not add value to the program. Stupid list, just ignore.

Oh it's just simplified clickbait for sure (and very much guesswork, especially for the private schools that don't have to release a lot of data). It's offseason stuff that they should have saved for the offseason. But still interesting to pick apart.

More importantly, does your avatar now mean you are an Ice Girl Mom? Let's go, Stars!
User avatar
SMU Pom Mom
All-American
All-American
Posts: 608
Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by SMU Pom Mom »

Dukie wrote:More importantly, does your avatar now mean you are an Ice Girl Mom? Let's go, Stars!

Yes! She decided she missed dance, so she trained for a year and made the team. Guess I'm a Stars fan now!
User avatar
highlander
All-American
All-American
Posts: 991
Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
Location: Austin, TX

Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC

Post by highlander »

While itΓÇÖs easy to pick this list apart, itΓÇÖs not without merit. The simple truth is our viewership has been near the bottom compared to other P4 schools for most games this year. ItΓÇÖs going to take a while to build up a fan base. It will happen, itΓÇÖs just going to take more than 3 months.
Post Reply