Not sure how they purported to calculate this, but here is the list:
https://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/19/college-sports-programs-valuations.htmlhttps://www.cnbc.com/2024/12/19/college-sports-programs-valuations.html
CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
We are in arguably our first year of any real success. We can't get 30k to a football game, our basketball team is mediocre and we have no real measured brand value. All it takes is for free agency to wipe out anything we've accomplished this year. It's understandable.
- Drum Major
- Scout Team
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2010 11:56 am
- Location: North Richland Hills, TX
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
Maybe they changed their mind. The link seems to be dead.
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
Drum Major wrote:Maybe they changed their mind. The link seems to be dead.
Relinking:
https://www.cnbc.com/amp/2024/12/19/college-sports-programs-valuations.html
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
Weird ratings. Stanford is behind Clemson, but ahead of FSU, Duke, etc. UNC is way down the list. We're at the bottom but have the lowest revenue, duh. We are foregoing $20+ Million a year in TV revenue. Stanford surprises me. FSU is looking stupider and stupider every week.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
- SMU Pom Mom
- All-American
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
We are in the midst of a 1.3B sports facilities upgrade but apparently that does not add value to the program. Stupid list, just ignore.
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
SMU Pom Mom wrote:We are in the midst of a 1.3B sports facilities upgrade but apparently that does not add value to the program. Stupid list, just ignore.
Oh it's just simplified clickbait for sure (and very much guesswork, especially for the private schools that don't have to release a lot of data). It's offseason stuff that they should have saved for the offseason. But still interesting to pick apart.
More importantly, does your avatar now mean you are an Ice Girl Mom? Let's go, Stars!
- SMU Pom Mom
- All-American
- Posts: 608
- Joined: Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:50 pm
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
Dukie wrote:More importantly, does your avatar now mean you are an Ice Girl Mom? Let's go, Stars!
Yes! She decided she missed dance, so she trained for a year and made the team. Guess I'm a Stars fan now!
- highlander
- All-American
- Posts: 991
- Joined: Fri Sep 16, 2022 12:10 pm
- Location: Austin, TX
Re: CNBC Rates SMU Athletics the Least Valuable in the ACC
While itΓÇÖs easy to pick this list apart, itΓÇÖs not without merit. The simple truth is our viewership has been near the bottom compared to other P4 schools for most games this year. ItΓÇÖs going to take a while to build up a fan base. It will happen, itΓÇÖs just going to take more than 3 months.