Fort Worth Bowl

by **ReedFrawg** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 7:10 pm

[quote="BrianTinBigD"]I guess the one thing that the Toads are forgetting here is that they are 3rd in the freaking Mountain West. I don't care if you upset Ohio State and Texas this year if you were unable to beat any school from Utah. You are unranked and have managed to let this great opportunity pass you by. You plau in a conference that has the core of their fans in the following states:

True, but BYU should beat Utah which would put us in sole possession of 2nd place. (Not discounting that we dropped the ball against Utah.) As for a TCU-SMU matchup, I think it would do very well across the state of TX (and OK). LIke it or not, TCU has built up some street cred with the Big 12 south and I think a lot of these fans would tune in to see two former SWC schools. I think a lot of casual Big 12 south fans would want to see if SMU is for real/have they turned the corner/etc.

by **Corp** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:07 pm

Enough discussion...

TCU will play a team from the PAC 10 in San Diego's Poinsettia Bowl.

by **SmooBoy** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:36 pm

Corp wrote:Enough discussion...

TCU will play a team from the PAC 10 in San Diego's Poinsettia Bowl.

Awesome, so we have a committee member of the Ponsettia Bowl with us. So who are the candidates to play TCU in your bowl? How long have you been a committee member? What happened to the Holiday Bowl moniker? When will you make this news public to the likes of the Dallas Morning News, the San Diego Hang Ten Magazine, and Entertainment Tonight?

by **mathman** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 8:38 am

Stallion wrote:like SMU didn't [deleted] up a storm in 1983 when it was forced to go to the Sun Bowl at 10-1. If TCU ends up at 10-2 I can understand the frustration. The entire system sucks.

I agree with Stallion on this. I was one of the bitchers at the time. I understand TCU's frustration but at the same time, you administration brought it on yourselves by moving to the MWC. What was their logic in doing that anyway? I have never understood that.

by **DallasFrog** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:37 am

So far the bowl tie-ins have been the only drawback to the MWC. Otherwise it has been a breath of fresh air...

by **MustangStealth** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:39 am

SmooBoy wrote:Awesome, so we have a committee member of the Ponsettia Bowl with us.

That's good, because we also have a friend of a friend of a cousin of a neighbor of a friend of someone's housekeeper who once met someone from the NO Bowl committee in the other thread. Why don't the major news outlets just read ponyfans?

by **davidsmu94** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 10:40 am

DallasFrog wrote:So far the bowl tie-ins have been the only drawback to the MWC. Otherwise it has been a breath of fresh air...

Yeah, bowl tie-ins aren't a big deal. Especially when you can enjoy a roadtrip to New Mexico, or Utah.

by **EastStang** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:57 am

You forgot Laramie and Ft. Collins? But in all fairness there is Colorado Springs, Las Vegas, and San Diego as well.

by **DallasFrog** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:17 pm

Every MWC road game destination is more appealing than Tulsa, Houston, New Orleans (Today) and El Paso. So you have to buy a few plane tickets, at least you'll enjoy the final destination...

by **mathman** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:00 pm

DallasFrog wrote:So far the bowl tie-ins have been the only drawback to the MWC. Otherwise it has been a breath of fresh air...

A breath of fresh air in what respect? You just didn't like the schools here in this part of the country?

by **Peruna88** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:06 pm

DallasFrog wrote:Every MWC road game destination is more appealing than Tulsa, Houston, New Orleans (Today) and El Paso. So you have to buy a few plane tickets, at least you'll enjoy the final destination...

You're kidding, right?

Tulsa - Southwest Airlines non-stop
Houston - SWA non-stop
New Orleans - SWA non-stop
El Paso - SWA non-stop

All around $39-54 each way? We can see MORE games at way less than 1/2 the price you pay to fly out west.

by **ReedFrawg** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:16 pm

Peruna88 wrote:
DallasFrog wrote:Every MWC road game destination is more appealing than Tulsa, Houston, New Orleans (Today) and El Paso. So you have to buy a few plane tickets, at least you'll enjoy the final destination...

You're kidding, right?

Tulsa - Southwest Airlines non-stop
Houston - SWA non-stop
New Orleans - SWA non-stop
El Paso - SWA non-stop

All around $39-54 each way? We can see MORE games at way less than 1/2 the price you pay to fly out west.

He wasn't talking price or ease of travel. He said the destinations were more enjoyable. I don't care either way.

by **deepellumfrog** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:36 pm

[quote="J.T.supporta"

For the froggie that pointed out the BIG XII teams yall beat, what happendend after yall beat OU and after yall beat Texas Tech???...A BIG FAT LOSS! ... yall can't beat a good team then lose to your rival or a conference team. [/quote]

And what happened after you beat Texas Tech? Oh yeah, you didn't. And you followed that up with... a loss to North Texas State. I guess you guys are much better since you can lose to a good team then lose to your big area rival. Your bowl aspirations are cute and all, but what say you save this talk until you beat Rice and you actually have something to crow about?

by **Treadway21** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:42 pm

Where did all your big wins get you? The chance to play at home against SMU. 10-2 doesn't look quiet as good now does it.

by **J.T.supporta** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:46 pm

Deepellumfrog, I never said anything about us beating big named teams this year, my post was meant towards your other froggie friends on this board.

All they talked about was beating OU and beating Tech....then yall chocked....we weren't playing to beat tech were we playing not to get blown out. And as for UNT, they're not our rival and that game was a horrible sight for SMU fans.

Fort Worth Bowl

Who is online