Rice 7 USM 0

by **perunapower** » Wed Oct 03, 2007 11:46 pm

Peruna_Ate_My_Rolex wrote:
perunapower wrote:Since USM is apparently handing out gifts, can we safely assume that today was the first day of Christmas? That would make the SMU game fall on the eleventh day of Christmas. There are twelve days of Christmas, so we may be safe.

I was thinking it was the 6th day because apparently the Geese, known as S. Miss, laid an egg tonight.

Boo. No gifts for us.

by **OR-See-Nee** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 5:34 am

Rice started last year 0-4 before finishing 7-5, right? Maybe there's some hope for us. That Rice OL looked pretty good last night. Really made some lanes for the RBs. Please refill my cup o' kool-aid. Shaken, not stirred.

by **SMU Football Blog** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:23 am

Nobody thought Tulsa was going to lose again before they played us last year, either. Don't scramble your eggs before they are laid. Or somesuch.

by **mrydel** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:44 am

It was a very exciting game. Most the fans left early and it appeared that many returned as the game got close. Double disappointment.

by **MrMustang1965** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:46 am

mrydel wrote:It was a very exciting game. Most the fans left early and it appeared that many returned as the game got close. Double disappointment.

USM must have an 'in-and-out' policy.

by **Pony Soup** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 9:55 am

Every school should have an in-and-out policy. Particularly those that require a bottle of whiskey to make it through the 2nd half. cough cough.

by **bigdaddy08091** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 8:49 pm

Perkins Pony wrote:Rice scores on a pass. oh no, poor SMU.

The end of the game tells you exactly what PB said. The conference is wide open?

by **ALEX LIFESON** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:07 pm

CUSA is very weak this year.

by **davidsmu94** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 10:41 pm

CSA is like the WAC of the early 90s

by **perunapower** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:00 pm

ALEX LIFESON wrote:CUSA is very weak this year.

I agree and disagree. I think C-USA is very inconsistent. ECU nearly beat VT, UCF should have beaten UT, UH nearly beat ECU, UH stayed with Oregon for most of the game, etc.

by **MrMustang1965** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:00 pm

davidsmu94 wrote:CSA is like the WAC of the early 90s

The Confederate States of America? :shock:

by **perunapower** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:02 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:
davidsmu94 wrote:CSA is like the WAC of the early 90s
The Confederate States of America?

Apparently the WAC seceded because they felt their rights were being encroached upon and they were invaded by the Union (the BCS?) and beat back down into their place.

by **davidsmu94** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:05 pm

MrMustang1965 wrote:
davidsmu94 wrote:CSA is like the WAC of the early 90s
The Confederate States of America?

LOL, my bad.. CUSA, the Confederates is more like the SEC of the 50s

by **Perkins Pony** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:06 pm

Igt was the MWC seceded from the WAC, and that resulted in SMU moving to the CUSA.

by **Treadway21** » Thu Oct 04, 2007 11:27 pm

The BCS is like the Union and the Mid Majors are in the reconstruction period. The reconstruction was ugly for everyone. Kind of a stretch analogy, but us southern folk are still bitter about the reconstruction,

Rice 7 USM 0

Re: Rice 7 USM 0

It ws the MWC who seceded

Who is online