|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by Charleston Pony » Fri Nov 09, 2007 7:31 pm
TheRealTruth wrote:Arkansas would be great. It was a good game back in 1999 when we played them (at least in the first quarter) and plus we didn't get embarrased. Heres's an idea though: What about Ole Miss? They are in the SEC, usually weak, but still give us credibility if we one. Further, travel time isn't bad. I remember when we played them in 98 and almost beat them. Either way, I just want to play some big tradional programs that are interesting. I really don't care who it is.
Ole Miss was a great home/home and I'd like to see them again. Our problem is finding a way to attract 32,000 (full price) paying customers. We are reaching a point where we can only get home games with other programs who can't attract flies. We've been fortunate to have TTech coming in here as often as they have.
-
Charleston Pony

-
- Posts: 28964
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
- Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC
by TheRealTruth » Sat Nov 10, 2007 4:11 am
Fortunate? Tech should be lucky we put them on the schedule.
-
TheRealTruth
-
by Corp » Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:58 am
[quote="TheRealTruth"]
Sorry, but Sam Houston is a 4th Tier situation.
So are...
University of Houston
University of Southern Mississippi
University of Texas El Paso
University of Memphis
East Carolina University
Marshall University (Regional Ranking)
-
Corp

-
- Posts: 402
- Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2004 6:18 pm
by TheRealTruth » Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:49 am
I'm not going to argue with that. It helps my point, I mean if we already have 5 fourth tier situations scheduled that we can't avoid, why add more for are non-conferance games?
-
TheRealTruth
-
by Stallion » Sat Nov 10, 2007 11:57 am
because we need to save room for the Pillow Fight games against the Tier 1 schools like Rice and Tulane and the Traditional Classic against Tulsa.
-
Stallion

-
- Posts: 44302
- Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Texas,USA
by TheRealTruth » Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:22 pm
great comment. Too bad, SMU seems to agree with you.
-
TheRealTruth
-
by Water Pony » Sat Nov 10, 2007 1:57 pm
Stallion wrote:allright we got a new poster with some Hot Sports Opinions. I like call the argument. "Fight for Relevance"
I'll buy that: Pony Up = FFR
Anything less is not worth it or, as the current coaching staff called it, "All Out!"
Pony Up
-

Water Pony

-
- Posts: 5513
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Chicagoland
by TheRealTruth » Sat Nov 10, 2007 6:07 pm
"All Out", is how I will always remember the Bennett Regime. Too bad SMU wasnt playing the Texas School for the Deaf that day.
-
TheRealTruth
-
by Pony94 » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:06 pm
We should just drop football and bring back baseball and track.
-
Pony94

-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:21 pm
- Location: Flower Mound
by Ponyx2 » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:23 pm
Dropping football isn't the answer. As a matter of fact, that's the WORST thing we could do. The problem has been a lack of commitment to excel. For far too long we've been not only accepting of mediocrity, we've encouraged it. Finally we have an AD in Orsini who is saying the right things and so far his actions have created some rays of hope. We just have to see how he delivers on this hire. At least for the first time in a long, long time I'm optimistic.
Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein.
- Joe Theismann
-

Ponyx2

-
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:00 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Pony94 » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:26 pm
Ponyx2 wrote:Dropping football isn't the answer. As a matter of fact, that's the WORST thing we could do. The problem has been a lack of commitment to excel. For far too long we've been not only accepting of mediocrity, we've encouraged it. Finally we have an AD in Orsini who is saying the right things and so far his actions have created some rays of hope. We just have to see how he delivers on this hire. At least for the first time in a long, long time I'm optimistic.
I was only kidding...but would love to see Baseball back...
-
Pony94

-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:21 pm
- Location: Flower Mound
by Ponyx2 » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:29 pm
Pony94 wrote:Ponyx2 wrote:Dropping football isn't the answer. As a matter of fact, that's the WORST thing we could do. The problem has been a lack of commitment to excel. For far too long we've been not only accepting of mediocrity, we've encouraged it. Finally we have an AD in Orsini who is saying the right things and so far his actions have created some rays of hope. We just have to see how he delivers on this hire. At least for the first time in a long, long time I'm optimistic.
I was only kidding...but would love to see Baseball back...
Sorry to get on my high horse. I'm overly sensitive to that kind of talk. And I hope you get baseball back. Didn't they drop that in the mid 70s?
Nobody in football should be called a genius. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein.
- Joe Theismann
-

Ponyx2

-
- Posts: 510
- Joined: Sat Sep 15, 2007 7:00 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Pony94 » Sat Nov 10, 2007 7:31 pm
Yeah...I think it was dropped to make soccer a real sport...not just club...but I dont want to be quoted on that...
-
Pony94

-
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Sat Feb 17, 2007 8:21 pm
- Location: Flower Mound
by TheRealTruth » Sat Nov 10, 2007 10:58 pm
Keep Football, Schedule USC
-
TheRealTruth
-
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests
|
|