Front Page Picture Says it all......

by **bigdaddy08091** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:36 pm

J.T.supporta wrote:
bigdaddy08091 wrote:When did everyone stop having fun?

WEN YOU STARTED POSTING ON PFs...

now thats FUNny

Finally got someone speaking the truth. It hurts I know, but someone had to do it.

by **bigdaddy08091** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:38 pm

George S. Patton wrote:
bigdaddy08091 wrote:[When did everyone stop having fun?

When you started posting.

I am sorry Patton that I stole your toy and kicked sand in your face , grow up and fight back like a man. You are a man aren't you? I

by **jtstang** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:46 pm

Depends on whether he's 40 or not.

by **George S. Patton** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:49 pm

jtstang wrote:Depends on whether he's 40 or not.

But I do think Mike Gundy knows. Heard they are selling those t-shirts up there.

by **bigdaddy08091** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:51 pm

jtstang wrote:Depends on whether he's 40 or not.

Almost missed that one JT. Good one.

by **mavsrage311** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:33 pm

SMUshouldbebowling wrote:So you figure coming on here and making fun of everyone who love's SMU football, and most on this board do, even though they may be upset with it's present state, and berate them for sucking, not being part of a winning tradition . . . is that what I am hearing?? you must think that Vic is crap too then . . . right? He was a part of that loosing tradition . . . and Ramom F., Bordano, Swann, Sanders all those guys have no football knowledge right, because their teams were never better than 6-5????

Sure thing bud!

Hey, at least you know how to talk his language, well done

by **bigdaddy08091** » Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:58 pm

mavsrage311 wrote:
SMUshouldbebowling wrote:So you figure coming on here and making fun of everyone who love's SMU football, and most on this board do, even though they may be upset with it's present state, and berate them for sucking, not being part of a winning tradition . . . is that what I am hearing?? you must think that Vic is crap too then . . . right? He was a part of that loosing tradition . . . and Ramom F., Bordano, Swann, Sanders all those guys have no football knowledge right, because their teams were never better than 6-5????

Sure thing bud!

Hey, at least you know how to talk his language, well done

You can only make fun of bigdaddy, not other posters.

by **SMU_is_bowling** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 4:43 pm

bad type-o . . . my fault!

by **gostangs** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:38 pm

I'm still trying to get my head around the "DL in highschool = linebacker in college" statement. Trying to think of any examples of that (other then DE's) at a BCS school.

I think at good schools recruit DL's that were DL's in HS and LB's that were LB's in HS.

I think BD is an idiot. And crazy too. And a blow hard. And not smart. And unemployed. And unrelated to any players. And a wannabee.

Did I miss anything?

by **Stallion** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:47 pm

its not uncommon at BCS schools for them to recruit Safeties and make them LBs, LBs and make them DEs and DEs and make them DLM. Generally to get speed on the field. Recruiters project players based on their potential size after a weight program not their high school size. Now the BEST schools who get the BEST players usually can find the high school players who are already have the correct speed and size in high school to excel. But its not unusual at all even at the Biggest schools. The hardest position in College Football to recruit is DLM because so few have the speed and size to be great. Only a handful in Texas every year who fit that description-not enough to go around

by **gostangs** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:50 pm

I do not disagree with what you said. Heck, even the pros move them around in the manner you suggest.

I just could not recall the last time a BCS school recruited a HS DL to play LB. Does not happen due to speed issues. Would you agree?

by **Stallion** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 10:52 pm

I agree but again it would be based on projected size and speed. Usually DB to LB to DE to DT. Only rarely the other way. The reason of course, is you can't teach speed but you can always add bulk and weight in a weight program

by **bigdaddy08091** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:09 pm

gostangs wrote:I'm still trying to get my head around the "DL in highschool = linebacker in college" statement. Trying to think of any examples of that (other then DE's) at a BCS school.

I think at good schools recruit DL's that were DL's in HS and LB's that were LB's in HS.

I think BD is an idiot. And crazy too. And a blow hard. And not smart. And unemployed. And unrelated to any players. And a wannabee.

Did I miss anything?

You are the only dumb [deleted] that did not understand that statement. Please stay a SMU and do not poison the rest of the college football world with these dumb [deleted] statements. Where have you been?

by **bigdaddy08091** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:13 pm

gostangs wrote:I do not disagree with what you said. Heck, even the pros move them around in the manner you suggest.

I just could not recall the last time a BCS school recruited a HS DL to play LB. Does not happen due to speed issues. Would you agree?

Hell no! Please keep posting on Pony Fans where you may seem smart, but the rest of the football world is way past your mentality. WATCH THE COMBINES THAT HAVE BEEN ON TV FOREVER NOW!

by **smu96** » Thu Nov 15, 2007 11:52 pm

bigdaddy08091 wrote:
gostangs wrote:I do not disagree with what you said. Heck, even the pros move them around in the manner you suggest.

I just could not recall the last time a BCS school recruited a HS DL to play LB. Does not happen due to speed issues. Would you agree?

Hell no! Please keep posting on Pony Fans where you may seem smart, but the rest of the football world is way past your mentality. WATCH THE COMBINES THAT HAVE BEEN ON TV FOREVER NOW!

Ok, bigdaddyallknowing of all football things, list some examples.

Front Page Picture Says it all......

Who is online