Football Rumor Mill- "Expect a big splash"
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
EastStang wrote:There is a name from that list that is interesting and that's Ralph Friegen. The guy is a Maryland guy, but has ties to Orsini from Georgia Tech. Maryland is on the cusp of either going to a bowl or sitting home for the second straight year. If the Terps don't go bowling the natives will get restless. He's also near the Mangini weight limit. You wouldn't want him to cannon ball into your pool.
Maryland beat Purdue in that Chumps Bowl last year, didn't they?
Basically the test for SMU head coach shold comes down to this:
- If the coach's name is not recognizable by the casual football fan and you have to look him up on wikipedia to get a profile, then he should be cut from the list. In other words, we should all be able to walk into a party and say SMU hired _________ as their head coach and the response from the non SMU fan should be "really, wow, what did SMU do to get him?" not "who is that,.....oh ok....that's nice".
I hope everyone agrees.
- If the coach's name is not recognizable by the casual football fan and you have to look him up on wikipedia to get a profile, then he should be cut from the list. In other words, we should all be able to walk into a party and say SMU hired _________ as their head coach and the response from the non SMU fan should be "really, wow, what did SMU do to get him?" not "who is that,.....oh ok....that's nice".
I hope everyone agrees.
George S. Patton wrote:EastStang wrote:There is a name from that list that is interesting and that's Ralph Friegen. The guy is a Maryland guy, but has ties to Orsini from Georgia Tech. Maryland is on the cusp of either going to a bowl or sitting home for the second straight year. If the Terps don't go bowling the natives will get restless. He's also near the Mangini weight limit. You wouldn't want him to cannon ball into your pool.
Maryland beat Purdue in that Chumps Bowl last year, didn't they?
Why would he leave his alma mater? MD could match, if not exceed anything SMU threw at him. And it's not like his record been horrible. During his tenure the worst he's been is 5-6.
TheRealTruth wrote:Basically the test for SMU head coach shold comes down to this:
- If the coach's name is not recognizable by the casual football fan and you have to look him up on wikipedia to get a profile, then he should be cut from the list. In other words, we should all be able to walk into a party and say SMU hired _________ as their head coach and the response from the non SMU fan should be "really, wow, what did SMU do to get him?" not "who is that,.....oh ok....that's nice".
I hope everyone agrees.
I think you are dead on with that analysis.
TheRealTruth wrote:Basically the test for SMU head coach shold comes down to this:
- If the coach's name is not recognizable by the casual football fan and you have to look him up on wikipedia to get a profile, then he should be cut from the list. In other words, we should all be able to walk into a party and say SMU hired _________ as their head coach and the response from the non SMU fan should be "really, wow, what did SMU do to get him?" not "who is that,.....oh ok....that's nice".
I hope everyone agrees.
That is the most accurate statement I have seen on this board related to the coaching search. A big name will generate genuine interest and put fans in the stands for at least a few games. After that all it takes is winning!