krapthorpe =WORST MISTAKE IN SMU HISTORY

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:19 pm

He was there for 3 years. Did it with someone elses players. Recruiting is what I see as SMU's biggest problem. Something I think most of you aren't recognizing.

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:20 pm

I love it how a coach isn't good enough for Louisville is money for us.

by **jimhagle** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:28 pm

And he lost to Bennett which isn't good at all!

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:35 pm

What pisses me of is Krag is something that started in this chat room based on a 20 questions hint from thecollegerumormill.com. nothing more. I hope Krapthorpe goes to jail so this deal will fail. I used to be gung-ho bennett. Never thought I would have to fall back on Barnett, but right now barrnett is looking like Belecheck

by **me@smu** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:35 pm

he lost to Bennett but also won a conference championship and took a 1-10 team (sound familiar) and made it a 8-4 team the next year?

I would love a big name coach that is a constant winner but realistically we aren't goign to get one so how about getting a coach who turned a program located in a small [deleted] town like Tulsa into a winner?

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:37 pm

UH.............Realisticaly we can get Barnett. Only problem is people like you who want a garbage coach.

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:37 pm

WhitneyHouston wrote:UH.............Realisticaly we can get Barnett. Only problem is people like you who want a garbage coach.

who is a garbage coach?

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:38 pm

Krapthorpe = garabage coach

by **mustangxc** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:39 pm

WhitneyHouston wrote:UH.............Realisticaly we can get Barnett. Only problem is people like you who want a garbage coach.

I would love to get Barnett, but Kragthorpe is not a garbage coach.

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:39 pm

WhitneyHouston wrote:Krapthorpe = garabage coach

can you explain your reasoning behind that?

by **me@smu** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:40 pm

And just so we can put the stupid Krag is only a couple games above .500, so is Barnett (85-82).

And never mind that Barnett very nearly got Colorado's program shut down for misconduct.

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:47 pm

Typical SMU Coach Search: Exciting names get thrown around, proven coaches want to come here, and we go the let's give a nice unproven guy a shot rout. Come on, at this stage in SMU Football history, is it really worth taking this kind of risk?

MY issue with Krapthorpe is the following:

1. Lacks Big Name (for recruiting)

2. Only History is 3 ok years at Tulsa

3. Being run out of a modern Big East team

by **PonySnob** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:48 pm

J.T.supporta wrote:the only reason i somewhat like Krag as a hire is because HE IS A PROVEN WINNER IN CUSA

Couldn't the same be said of Tommy Bowden?

by **J.T.supporta** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:49 pm

WhitneyHouston wrote:Typical SMU Coach Search: Exciting names get thrown around, proven coaches want to come here, and we go the let's give a nice unproven guy a shot rout. Come on, at this stage in SMU Football history, is it really worth taking this kind of risk?

MY issue with Krapthorpe is the following:

1. Lacks Big Name (for recruiting)

2. Only History is 3 ok years at Tulsa

3. Being run out of a modern Big East team

i guess if you look past the fact hes a proven winner, especially in CUSA, won a CUSA title, has taken a gutter team to the top...i guess he can be a garbarge coach

PUT DOWN THAT CRACK PIPE WHITNEY!!!

by **WhitneyHouston** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 12:53 pm

Just know J.T., that by supporting Krapthorpe you had a small part in the downfall of SMU Football.

krapthorpe =WORST MISTAKE IN SMU HISTORY

Who is online