|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by EastStang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:04 pm
That's why my list included current NFL assistants who might have their agents looking around since JT's list included Neuheisal. And it meets Mr. Orsini's January timeframe stated about 40 days ago.
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12668
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by jtstang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:05 pm
SMU Football Blog wrote:jtstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:Neuheisel has a job. He is the OC of the Baltimore Ravens
See my edit above. Add to my definition anyone who has a job but nevertheless has expressed interest in the SMU job and been endorsed by his boss.
So if they haven't previously expressed interest in a position to a reporter, they aren't available?
You wanted a completely objective definition of "available" as Orsini has used that term and I have done my best to give you one. Can you choose a best from among those candidates or not?
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:10 pm
jtstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:jtstang wrote:SMU Football Blog wrote:Neuheisel has a job. He is the OC of the Baltimore Ravens
See my edit above. Add to my definition anyone who has a job but nevertheless has expressed interest in the SMU job and been endorsed by his boss.
So if they haven't previously expressed interest in a position to a reporter, they aren't available?
You wanted a completely objective definition of "available" as Orsini has used that term and I have done my best to give you one. Can you choose a best from among those candidates or not?
Who is to say your completely objective definition of "available" is the same as Orsini's?
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by jtstang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:11 pm
Nobody. You have already admitted you cannot pick a best available under Orsini's definition because you think it is too subjective. Can you pick one under mine or not?
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by Dutch » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:13 pm
marty schottenheimer
Ok this is getting ridiculous...I agree with Dutch on THIS ONE POST by him totally
-

Dutch

-
- Posts: 4377
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 2:56 pm
- Location: 75205
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:13 pm
jtstang wrote:Nobody. You have already admitted you cannot pick a best available under Orsini's definition because you think it is too subjective. Can you pick one under mine or not?
Is head coaching experience a must under your definition of "available?"
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by jtstang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:15 pm
I'll let you decide. Coaching experience was thrown in ther just so you knew that you are not "available". And as much as I admire what BrianT did wtih the Little Mustangs this year, neither is he.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by SMU Football Blog » Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:19 pm
jtstang wrote:I'll let you decide. Coaching experience was thrown in ther just so you knew that you are not "available". And as much as I admire what BrianT did wtih the Little Mustangs this year, neither is he.
OK. So "available" means a coach that may or may not be employed and may or may not have head coaching experience? But there is some level of experience required because I don't qualify and even though Brian T coaches football at the peewee level, he doesn't qualify. So, does a coach have to have college football coaching experience?
You are letting "Me" decide what "available" means. How is that a completely objective definition, then?
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by Peruna2001 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:11 pm
Phil Bennett
I hear he's available.
"He was quoting the Bible, Revelations. 'Behold the pale horse.' The man who 'sat on him was Death... and Hell followed with him.'"
"You tell 'em I'm coming... and hell's coming with me!"
-

Peruna2001

-
- Posts: 677
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
by ponywhupp9202 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:13 pm
DITKA
-

ponywhupp9202

-
- Posts: 372
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 12:40 am
- Location: Flower Mound, TX
by Mu$tang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:25 pm
SMU Football Blog wrote:jtstang wrote:I'll let you decide. Coaching experience was thrown in ther just so you knew that you are not "available". And as much as I admire what BrianT did wtih the Little Mustangs this year, neither is he.
OK. So "available" means a coach that may or may not be employed and may or may not have head coaching experience? But there is some level of experience required because I don't qualify and even though Brian T coaches football at the peewee level, he doesn't qualify. So, does a coach have to have college football coaching experience? You are letting "Me" decide what "available" means. How is that a completely objective definition, then?
I know you are, but what am I?
-

Mu$tang

-
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sat Jan 13, 2007 6:07 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
-
by EastStang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:28 pm
ponywhupp9202 wrote:DITKA
You know he just closed down his charity for needy football players. Could it be that Da Coach is thinking of hitting the sidelines again?
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12668
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by smupony94 » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:29 pm
EastStang wrote:ponywhupp9202 wrote:DITKA
You know he just closed down his charity for needy football players. Could it be that Da Coach is thinking of hitting the sidelines again?
The funds were not being appropriated correctly
-

smupony94

-
- Posts: 25665
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
- Location: Bee Cave, Texas
by SMUstang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:37 pm
I didn't see Chan Gailey's name on the list.
-
SMUstang

-
- Posts: 1240
- Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2000 4:01 am
- Location: Horseshoe Bay, TX, USA
-
by jtstang » Wed Dec 12, 2007 1:40 pm
SMUstang wrote:I didn't see Chan Gailey's name on the list.
Did not think of him, but he's definitely available.
-

jtstang

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: AusTxPony and 9 guests
|
|