Dickerson helps with SMU coaching search

[Longtime]

Please. Dickerson is "assisting" the search about as much as the so-called search committee is.

If there's any truth to this, I'm sure it's just Orsini making Dickerson feel like he's part of the process. Same with the search committee. It just gives the impression this is more than a one-man show, but in reality it is.

Now, James is a different subject because it's his job to stay on top of college football. He may actually have some useful information.

[Dutch]

Please. Dickerson is "assisting" the search about as much as the so-called search committee is.

If there's any truth to this, I'm sure it's just Orsini making Dickerson feel like he's part of the process. Same with the search committee. It just gives the impression this is more than a one-man show, but in reality it is.

Now, James is a different subject because it's his job to stay on top of college football. He may actually have some useful information.

exactly. it's a 'feel good' situation. let him sit in on a brainstorming session.

it's smart of orsini - we need to connect to some tradition

[Lotus]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

[J.T.supporta]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

He tends to flip flop and contradict what he says A LOT

[bigdaddy08091]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

You are misinterpreting SMU. I am just keeping it real. Facts are just facts. We are one of the last programs coaches are looking at. I sorry, but its just the truth. Nine televised games and the pony up campaign were a little premature for a program that hadn't had a winning season in 18 years. This is why we need a HC with the capabilities of building a program (longterm) not using it as a stepping stone. We have been stepped on enough.

[PonyKai]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

You are misinterpreting SMU. I am just keeping it real. Facts are just facts. We are one of the last programs coaches are looking at. I sorry, but its just the truth. Nine televised games and the pony up campaign were a little premature for a program that hadn't had a winning season in 18 years. This is why we need a HC with the capabilities of building a program (longterm) not using it as a stepping stone. We have been stepped on enough.

We had a winning season in 1997 at least I thought we did.

[bigdaddy08091]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

He tends to flip flop and contradict what he says A LOT

JT I have been consistent with everthing I have ever said and remain consistent. You on the other hand don't know which way you want to go. I have consistently said that our program and facilities are pound for pound the best in the country. Now I have hammered on the admin and some fans and will continue until this mess (culture) is changed. Because until it is changed we will continue to suck for years to come. If you don't think so, tell everybody what is gonna change it?

[J.T.supporta]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

You are misinterpreting SMU. I am just keeping it real. Facts are just facts. We are one of the last programs coaches are looking at. I sorry, but its just the truth. Nine televised games and the pony up campaign were a little premature for a program that hadn't had a winning season in 18 years. This is why we need a HC with the capabilities of building a program (longterm) not using it as a stepping stone. We have been stepped on enough.

We had a winning season in 1997 at least I thought we did.

yes we did, bigdaddy doesnt ever remember that

[bigdaddy08091]

First thing. Nobody is putting down the program.

I'm glad to hear (OK, read) that you feel that way, and I hope it's true.

Because when you write things like this:

Available coaches with more than one option don't choose SMU.

and this:

We aren't a program thats on the list of most proven HC's.

and this:

The biggest mistake we made this past season was to have 9 televised games and the stupid pony up campaign.

... it sure sounds like you're putting down the program.

Maybe I'm misinterpreting what you're saying. If that's the case, I apologize.

You are misinterpreting SMU. I am just keeping it real. Facts are just facts. We are one of the last programs coaches are looking at. I sorry, but its just the truth. Nine televised games and the pony up campaign were a little premature for a program that hadn't had a winning season in 18 years. This is why we need a HC with the capabilities of building a program (longterm) not using it as a stepping stone. We have been stepped on enough.

We had a winning season in 1997 at least I thought we did.

yes we did, bigdaddy doesnt ever remember that

Ok, we were 6-5. No bowl appearance or conference championship. Losing season to me, but thats just the kind of fan I am. I expect more from the best university in the land.

[PonySnob]

Dickerson and James love SMU, but hate what's happened to the athletic department.

But the only reason that Dickerson came to SMU is because we would pay him more than other schools would........should we really be concerned with this thoughts on this matter? At least James came to SMU because of the "triangle" that is so abundant on campus!

[bigdaddy08091]

Dickerson and James love SMU, but hate what's happened to the athletic department.

But the only reason that Dickerson came to SMU is because we would pay him more than other schools would........should we really be concerned with this thoughts on this matter? At least James came to SMU because of the "triangle" that is so abundant on campus!

You are so full of [deleted]! CJ hasn't been involved in the so called triangle since he left. We tarnished his name and visa versa. Where do people come up with this [deleted]?

[EastStang]

You are so full of [deleted]! CJ hasn't been involved in the so called triangle since he left. We tarnished his name and visa versa. Where do people come up with this [deleted]?

No triangle for CJ in 25 years? Ouch!!!

[White Helmet]

Then where did his son come from....wait is CJ's "son" the Christ Child?

[bigdaddy08091]

You are so full of [deleted]! CJ hasn't been involved in the so called triangle since he left. We tarnished his name and visa versa. Where do people come up with this [deleted]?

No triangle for CJ in 25 years? Ouch!!!

It took me a minute you nasty fuker.

A+

[ebrooks11]

You are so full of [deleted]! CJ hasn't been involved in the so called triangle since he left. We tarnished his name and visa versa. Where do people come up with this [deleted]?

No triangle for CJ in 25 years? Ouch!!!

I wanna know what Bigdaddy thought the triangle was?