|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by ponynut » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:26 pm
He is a weasel and will jump ship at the first opportunity.
-
ponynut

-
- Posts: 261
- Joined: Sun Feb 09, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Tyler, TX, 75703
by QuikSStang » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:30 pm
if i had a nickel for every thread about "anybody but fran"...
-

QuikSStang

-
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 pm
- Location: Dalla$
by Cadillac » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:30 pm
ponynut wrote:He is a weasel and will jump ship at the first opportunity.
Does this mean you wouldn't take Nick Saban or Bobby Patrino either?
-CoS
-

Cadillac

-
- Posts: 2184
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
- Location: McKinney
by SMU Football Blog » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:35 pm
Phil Bennett would have left if he didn't suck. Widely rumored he actually took an interview in Dallas near the end of last season.
Fran doesn't leave if he doesn't win or we don't fire him. I don't understand why people can't figure that out. I don't blame coaches for leaving and taking other jobs. Being loyal cost USM's Bower millions.
BTW, I once left a job for more money and responsibility. Does that make me a weasel?
-

SMU Football Blog

-
- Posts: 4418
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:44 pm
- Location: North Dallas, Texas
-
by Balogna Pony » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:37 pm
Cadillac wrote:ponynut wrote:He is a weasel and will jump ship at the first opportunity.
Does this mean you wouldn't take Nick Saban or Bobby Patrino either? -CoS
(1) They are too old;
(2) They would not be able to build up a program from scratch; and
(3) They would not be able to recruit.
-
Balogna Pony

-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:12 pm
by QuikSStang » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:37 pm
SMU Football Blog wrote:Phil Bennett would have left if he didn't suck. Widely rumored he actually took an interview in Dallas near the end of last season.
Fran doesn't leave if he doesn't win or we don't fire him.
I don't understand why people can't figure that out. I don't blame coaches for leaving and taking other jobs. Being loyal cost USM's Bower millions.
i agree with what you're saying, but I just can't have respect for someone who tries for 13 games of a 16 game schedule and then leaves by calling the owner on his way to Arky and leaving a note he had copied at Kinkos that afternoon
-

QuikSStang

-
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Wed Sep 26, 2007 11:21 pm
- Location: Dalla$
by couch 'em » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:39 pm
ponynut wrote:He is a weasel and will jump ship at the first opportunity.
Who cares? If it is down to him and someone unproven, why not take him, let him recruit for a few years, then leave. We are better off, he is better off. Win/win.
Better to have a great coach for 2 or 3 years than a medicore coach for 5 or 6.
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
by Cadillac » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:42 pm
Balogna Pony wrote:(1) They are too old; (2) They would not be able to build up a program from scratch; and (3) They would not be able to recruit.
(4) Your crack habit is oustripping the humor of your handle.
Seriously, how on earth would either of them be too old? Given that your first contention can be rejected out of hand I really don't think you'll be able to support your second or third.
Either way, it's all supra since the whole point was that ponynut was citing the "bolt-factor" as a reason to reject a candidate. I'm just curious if that applies to all coaches, or just Fran.
-CoS
-

Cadillac

-
- Posts: 2184
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
- Location: McKinney
by BRStang » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:50 pm
Cadillac wrote:Balogna Pony wrote:(1) They are too old; (2) They would not be able to build up a program from scratch; and (3) They would not be able to recruit.
(4) Your crack habit is oustripping the humor of your handle. Seriously, how on earth would either of them be too old? Given that your first contention can be rejected out of hand I really don't think you'll be able to support your second or third. Either way, it's all supra since the whole point was that ponynut was citing the "bolt-factor" as a reason to reject a candidate. I'm just curious if that applies to all coaches, or just Fran. -CoS
I think his post was tongue-in-cheek.
Geaux MUSTANGS! Geaux Tigers!
-

BRStang

-
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:26 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
by Cadillac » Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:54 pm
BRStang wrote: I think his post was tongue-in-cheek.
I think you're right. Sorry Bologna Pony, my sense of humor signed with UCLA over the weekend.
-CoS
-

Cadillac

-
- Posts: 2184
- Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
- Location: McKinney
by Balogna Pony » Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:03 pm
Cadillac wrote:BRStang wrote: I think his post was tongue-in-cheek.
I think you're right. Sorry Bologna Pony, my sense of humor signed with UCLA over the weekend. -CoS
Not a problem.
(5) Both Saban and Petrino owe their success to the inheritance of talented players.
I would write more, but I just burned my fingers on my crack pipe and typing hurts.
-
Balogna Pony

-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 4:12 pm
by MustangMan2001 » Mon Dec 31, 2007 1:04 pm
QuikSStang wrote:if i had a nickel for every thread about "anybody but fran"...
I would be rich Biatch!!!!!
-

MustangMan2001

-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Sat Sep 16, 2006 2:30 pm
by EastStang » Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:31 pm
One question on Fran that I have is what did he tell recruits about SMU when he was recruiting for A&M THIS YEAR? In other words, how does he go back to some of these same kids and say the opposite of what he said six months ago?
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12668
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by BRStang » Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:33 pm
EastStang wrote:One question on Fran that I have is what did he tell recruits about SMU when he was recruiting for A&M THIS YEAR? In other words, how does he go back to some of these same kids and say the opposite of what he said six months ago?
The letters "SMU" probably never rolled off of his lips during the entire time he was at aTm, sad to say.
Geaux MUSTANGS! Geaux Tigers!
-

BRStang

-
- Posts: 2850
- Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:26 am
- Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana
by mrydel » Mon Dec 31, 2007 2:37 pm
EastStang wrote:One question on Fran that I have is what did he tell recruits about SMU when he was recruiting for A&M THIS YEAR? In other words, how does he go back to some of these same kids and say the opposite of what he said six months ago?
He probably said "Since you did not attend their camp they will not bother you."
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
-

mrydel

-
- Posts: 32035
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Sherwood,AR,USA
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests
|
|