|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by CalallenStang » Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:15 pm
Odd. Has some concepts I've thought of. By the way, I've got an idea for something that I call the "neverending option offense." I won't go into detail here (don't want my idea taken), but I will say this: envision every play looking extremely similar, all with a run/pass option (from multiple players), with ample opportunities for misdirection and playaction.
I've run it by some people who have good defensive minds, and if anyone ever implements it, it's got the possibility of taking the high school and possibly college level of football by storm. I think that the pro level athletes might be able to stop it based on pure athletic ability.
The downfall is that it requires a decision to be made by every player on the field on every play. It would require every player to have a knowledge of the philosophy of the offense at least equal to the coordinator's knowledge of it.
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by RednBlue11 » Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:44 pm
CalallenStang wrote:Odd. Has some concepts I've thought of. By the way, I've got an idea for something that I call the "neverending option offense." I won't go into detail here (don't want my idea taken), but I will say this: envision every play looking extremely similar, all with a run/pass option (from multiple players), with ample opportunities for misdirection and playaction.
I've run it by some people who have good defensive minds, and if anyone ever implements it, it's got the possibility of taking the high school and possibly college level of football by storm. I think that the pro level athletes might be able to stop it based on pure athletic ability.
The downfall is that it requires a decision to be made by every player on the field on every play. It would require every player to have a knowledge of the philosophy of the offense at least equal to the coordinator's knowledge of it.
exactly what the west coast offense demands...i bet on a small scale it would work well for HS and obviously those more cerebral players in College could handle it.
"There ain't nothing you can't solve with one more beer"
-

RednBlue11

-
- Posts: 4858
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:52 pm
- Location: Under the "X" in Texas
-
by RGV Pony » Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:45 pm
It looks like 8-man football with 11 players. But then I guess that makes it 11-man football. That looks like 8-man football. Never mind.
-

RGV Pony

-
- Posts: 17269
- Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas
by HB Pony Dad » Thu Jul 24, 2008 8:56 pm
Is this true....
"Humphries (Piedmont's director of football operations) said he saw San Jose State run multiple A-11 plays last season against Stanford. Florida ran an offensive play recalling the A-11 against LSU. And Rutgers and the NFL's San Francisco 49ers ran punt plays containing aspects of Piedmont's offense."
??
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN FIRE JUNE JONES USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
-

HB Pony Dad

-
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
- Location: Huntington Beach, California
by HB Pony Dad » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:00 pm
MrMustang1965 wrote:Weird. Only someone in California could think up something like this!
Now, now, we have to be GC (geographically correct) in our posts...
"Weird. Only someone in Northern California could think up something like this!"
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN FIRE JUNE JONES USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
-

HB Pony Dad

-
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
- Location: Huntington Beach, California
by MrMustang1965 » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:05 pm
HB Pony Dad wrote:MrMustang1965 wrote:Weird. Only someone in California could think up something like this!
Now, now, we have to be GC (geographically correct) in our posts... "Weird. Only someone in Northern California could think up something like this!"
My apologies, HB Pony Dad. You're correct.
-

MrMustang1965

-
- Posts: 11161
- Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Dallas,TX,USA
-
by East Coast Mustang » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:19 pm
HB Pony Dad wrote:"Weird. Only someone in Northern California could think up something like this!"
I always thought Southern CA was the looniest part of the state
-

East Coast Mustang

-
- Posts: 7433
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
by RednBlue11 » Thu Jul 24, 2008 9:21 pm
East Coast Mustang wrote:HB Pony Dad wrote:"Weird. Only someone in Northern California could think up something like this!"
I always thought Southern CA was the looniest part of the state
the OC is sensible although excessive, but Hollywood is nuts
"There ain't nothing you can't solve with one more beer"
-

RednBlue11

-
- Posts: 4858
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 11:52 pm
- Location: Under the "X" in Texas
-
by HB Pony Dad » Thu Jul 24, 2008 10:10 pm
RednBlue11 wrote:East Coast Mustang wrote:HB Pony Dad wrote:"Weird. Only someone in Northern California could think up something like this!"
I always thought Southern CA was the looniest part of the state
the OC is sensible although excessive, but Hollywood is nuts
Life behind the Orange Curtain excessive?
Surely you jest! 
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN FIRE JUNE JONES USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
-

HB Pony Dad

-
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
- Location: Huntington Beach, California
by couch 'em » Fri Jul 25, 2008 1:34 am
Is this the extreme logical conclusion of the run & shoot?
"I think Couchem is right." -EVERYONE
-

couch 'em

-
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
by LAPonyAir » Fri Jul 25, 2008 2:00 am
RednBlue11 wrote:East Coast Mustang wrote:HB Pony Dad wrote:"Weird. Only someone in Northern California could think up something like this!"
I always thought Southern CA was the looniest part of the state
the OC is sensible although excessive, but Hollywood is nuts
Hollywood is out of its damn mind, but majority of crazy Californians (ie. those in San Francisco, Berkley) reside in the North.
-
LAPonyAir

-
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Wed Feb 27, 2008 7:28 pm
- Location: Dallas, TX
by White Helmet » Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:21 am
Only 5 eligible players per play, it will all be predicated on who is "covered" or uncovered in the formation. If a team runs it exclusively it should not be that hard to figure who is eligible on each play and account for that. It is not really that different than splitting a Guard and tackle out wide and throwing a bubble screen to the slot behind them. Just a tricked up offense to make up for a lack of talent.
-

White Helmet

-
- Posts: 2411
- Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2004 2:39 pm
- Location: Oro Valley, AZ
by Paladin » Fri Jul 25, 2008 8:38 am
CalallenStang wrote:Odd. Has some concepts I've thought of. By the way, I've got an idea for something that I call the "neverending option offense." I won't go into detail here (don't want my idea taken), but I will say this: envision every play looking extremely similar, all with a run/pass option (from multiple players), with ample opportunities for misdirection and playaction.
I've run it by some people who have good defensive minds, and if anyone ever implements it, it's got the possibility of taking the high school and possibly college level of football by storm. I think that the pro level athletes might be able to stop it based on pure athletic ability.
The downfall is that it requires a decision to be made by every player on the field on every play. It would require every player to have a knowledge of the philosophy of the offense at least equal to the coordinator's knowledge of it.
Isn't the "never-ending option offense" called Rugby ?
-

Paladin

-
- Posts: 848
- Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2005 3:57 pm
- Location: Grapevine, TX
by CalallenStang » Fri Jul 25, 2008 9:04 am
Paladin wrote:CalallenStang wrote:Odd. Has some concepts I've thought of. By the way, I've got an idea for something that I call the "neverending option offense." I won't go into detail here (don't want my idea taken), but I will say this: envision every play looking extremely similar, all with a run/pass option (from multiple players), with ample opportunities for misdirection and playaction.
I've run it by some people who have good defensive minds, and if anyone ever implements it, it's got the possibility of taking the high school and possibly college level of football by storm. I think that the pro level athletes might be able to stop it based on pure athletic ability.
The downfall is that it requires a decision to be made by every player on the field on every play. It would require every player to have a knowledge of the philosophy of the offense at least equal to the coordinator's knowledge of it.
Isn't the "never-ending option offense" called Rugby ?
That's where I got a lot of the inspiration for it...what I have is much more controlled, though, and does not actually have never-ending options (though it will appear to the defense that it does). The thought is that the coordinator can adjust the offense based upon what the defense is doing on a macro scale, and the different options that each player has on each play, which involves a lot of reading the defense, helps the offense to adjust to the defense on a micro scale.
Without going into too much detail, I will say that another disadvantage is that the QB has to have good speed, or it won't work...also, at least one RB (preferably two) has to throw the ball with decent authority, or it won't work. "Receivers" have to block and catch equally well.
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 10 guests
|
|