PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

The state of SMU Football...

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Postby SoCal_Pony » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:27 pm

TCU is not doing it.

You take a typical TCU team over the past 10 years and have them play UT, A&M, LSU, OU, Florida, Georgia, UCLA, Michigan....and they lose 8 games out of 10. (SMU btw would get smoked in all 10).

You take this current TCU squad and put them in the BigXII and they are sub-.500

TCU is over-rated, much like Tulsa, because they play in an inferior conference.

That is not a knock on TCU....GREAT FB PROGRAM, just the reality of the BCS world we live in.
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Postby smupony94 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:32 pm

You are my boy Blue
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Postby ponyboy » Tue Oct 07, 2008 4:40 pm

SoCal_Pony wrote:TCU is not doing it.

You take a typical TCU team over the past 10 years and have them play UT, A&M, LSU, OU, Florida, Georgia, UCLA, Michigan....and they lose 8 games out of 10. (SMU btw would get smoked in all 10).

You take this current TCU squad and put them in the BigXII and they are sub-.500

TCU is over-rated, much like Tulsa, because they play in an inferior conference.

That is not a knock on TCU....GREAT FB PROGRAM, just the reality of the BCS world we live in.


True they're playing in a lesser conference, but TCU's been consistently ranked in the top 25 for many years now, or at least knocking on the door. And, per Sagarin, at #15 in the nation TCU would be fourth place right now in the Big XII behind OU, UT, and Tech. I believe I would define that as "competitive" with the big state schools.

Now if by "competitive" you mean would win most of the games, you may only be able to count on one hand the number that could do that against UT and OU. So not only isn't TCU competitive, but neither are 240 other teams.
ponyboy
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15134
Joined: Wed Mar 22, 2000 4:01 am
Location: University Park,TX US

Postby NickSMU17 » Tue Oct 07, 2008 5:46 pm

Just to note...I hate Notre Dame and Charlie We is Fat, but he made a point in his press conference yesterday, that if he had not thrown his kids into the fire last year and made them learn from losing, they would not be 4-1. He said that many of those freshman who made bad mistakes last year are big contributors this year.

Reminded me of where SMU is at, granted we aren't ND, but we will get better.
NickSMU17
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5668
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Hinsdale, IL

Postby HB Pony Dad » Tue Oct 07, 2008 6:03 pm

NickSMU17 wrote:Just to note...I hate Notre Dame and Charlie We is Fat, but he made a point in his press conference yesterday, that if he had not thrown his kids into the fire last year and made them learn from losing, they would not be 4-1. He said that many of those freshman who made bad mistakes last year are big contributors this year.

Reminded me of where SMU is at, granted we aren't ND, but we will get better.


Tell me all this after Butch Davis plays "Deliverance" on the Frightened Eyerish this week and makes them "squeal like a pig"!

ND barely beat SD State with homer calls.

BTW I know Deliverance was supposed to be set in Georgia but I'm using literary license to include NC!
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN

FIRE JUNE JONES

Image
USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
User avatar
HB Pony Dad
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3950
Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
Location: Huntington Beach, California

Postby Pony_Fan » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:08 pm

Blue,

Please get some whine and cheese and have a BIG cry for us. We will never be UT or OU, ever. So get over it.

I concur with SoCal Pony, I've always stated it's MUCH easier to compete with big schools on the hard court and actually win at the highest level. March Madness is fair, BCS is BS.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Postby LA_Mustang » Tue Oct 07, 2008 9:19 pm

Pony_Fan wrote:I concur with SoCal Pony, I've always stated it's MUCH easier to compete with big schools on the hard court and actually win at the highest level. March Madness is fair, BCS is BS.

Preach on, Pony_Fan. I could not agree more. We could be two very good players away from the top 25 in b-ball.......we are probably four very good recruiting classes away from even thinking about the top 25 in football.
User avatar
LA_Mustang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 15604
Joined: Sun Nov 03, 2002 4:01 am
Location: El Porto, CA 90266

Postby Pony_Fan » Tue Oct 07, 2008 10:39 pm

LA_Mustang wrote:
Pony_Fan wrote:I concur with SoCal Pony, I've always stated it's MUCH easier to compete with big schools on the hard court and actually win at the highest level. March Madness is fair, BCS is BS.

Preach on, Pony_Fan. I could not agree more. We could be two very good players away from the top 25 in b-ball.......we are probably four very good recruiting classes away from even thinking about the top 25 in football.


Amen brother. At least fans would have a real program to root for. People need to wake up.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Re: The state of SMU Football...

Postby Big Easy Pony » Tue Oct 07, 2008 11:44 pm

Blue Horseshoe wrote:It's been a bit embarrassing having my friends from TX and OU talk about their programs.
I'm pretty diffferent on OU, but I'm embarrassed when people who talk about UT call themselves my friends, too.

Blue Horseshoe wrote:I'm afraid our economy will turn around far quicker than we will.
HA. Not even close.
User avatar
Big Easy Pony
Varsity
 
Posts: 336
Joined: Fri Sep 06, 2002 3:01 am
Location: New Orleans, La.

Re: The state of SMU Football...

Postby westexSMU » Wed Oct 08, 2008 1:00 am

[quote="Warbow"]

As always the case with JJ, as soon as he gets a decent defensive coordinator, his teams W-L records improves. You guys really need to look at making Coach Reinebold in charge of the D.[/quote]..............................Though alot of us think JJ made a hugh mistake starting a true freshman at QB this year, it probably would not have made alot of difference this year because of the poor defense. No question in my mind JJ will get it done here, but he will have to make coaching changes on defense. Now if he could just bring back Jerry Glanville.....Hawaii had their best D with Glanville as defensive coordinator.
User avatar
westexSMU
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2303
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Mustang Island

Postby EastStang » Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:53 am

Actually, given the youth, talent level and size of the defense, I think the coaching has been not bad in that area. Obviously, if a really good defensive genius in the NFL comes available at a decent price, JJ could try and hire him. But usually they stay in the NFL, or sit out and collect a check.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12668
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby SoCal_Pony » Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:38 am

ponyboy wrote:
SoCal_Pony wrote:TCU is not doing it.

You take a typical TCU team over the past 10 years and have them play UT, A&M, LSU, OU, Florida, Georgia, UCLA, Michigan....and they lose 8 games out of 10. (SMU btw would get smoked in all 10).

You take this current TCU squad and put them in the BigXII and they are sub-.500

TCU is over-rated, much like Tulsa, because they play in an inferior conference.

That is not a knock on TCU....GREAT FB PROGRAM, just the reality of the BCS world we live in.


True they're playing in a lesser conference, but TCU's been consistently ranked in the top 25 for many years now, or at least knocking on the door. And, per Sagarin, at #15 in the nation TCU would be fourth place right now in the Big XII behind OU, UT, and Tech. I believe I would define that as "competitive" with the big state schools.

Now if by "competitive" you mean would win most of the games, you may only be able to count on one hand the number that could do that against UT and OU. So not only isn't TCU competitive, but neither are 240 other teams.


Actually 5th as you forgot Missouri.

I think TCU would go 2-5 if their conference schedule included UT, A&M, Tech, OU, OSU, Neb and Missouri....and I am excluding a decent Kansas team.
User avatar
SoCal_Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5901
Joined: Sun Jan 05, 2003 4:01 am

Postby J.T.supporta » Wed Oct 08, 2008 11:47 am

if this was like the terrorist or ozone chart, the state of SMU football woujld be way above red by now
User avatar
J.T.supporta
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6160
Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:27 pm
Location: SMU

Postby EastStang » Wed Oct 08, 2008 12:59 pm

I think they'd have the toe tag out and ready.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 12668
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Postby PoconoPony » Wed Oct 08, 2008 2:54 pm

SoCal_Pony wrote:
ponyboy wrote:
SoCal_Pony wrote:TCU is not doing it.

You take a typical TCU team over the past 10 years and have them play UT, A&M, LSU, OU, Florida, Georgia, UCLA, Michigan....and they lose 8 games out of 10. (SMU btw would get smoked in all 10).

You take this current TCU squad and put them in the BigXII and they are sub-.500

TCU is over-rated, much like Tulsa, because they play in an inferior conference.

That is not a knock on TCU....GREAT FB PROGRAM, just the reality of the BCS world we live in.


True they're playing in a lesser conference, but TCU's been consistently ranked in the top 25 for many years now, or at least knocking on the door. And, per Sagarin, at #15 in the nation TCU would be fourth place right now in the Big XII behind OU, UT, and Tech. I believe I would define that as "competitive" with the big state schools.

Now if by "competitive" you mean would win most of the games, you may only be able to count on one hand the number that could do that against UT and OU. So not only isn't TCU competitive, but neither are 240 other teams.


Actually 5th as you forgot Missouri.

I think TCU would go 2-5 if their conference schedule included UT, A&M, Tech, OU, OSU, Neb and Missouri....and I am excluding a decent Kansas team.


Obviously, this TCU speculation is based entirely on TCU competing based on current recruiting capability as a non-BCS school. If, in fact, they were to become a member of the Big 12 their recruiting ability would be far higher and they certainly could then compete at the middle level of the conference at a minimum. They would then cease to become a regular top 25 club.
PoconoPony
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 4436
Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2008 8:01 pm
Location: Nesquehoning, Pennsylvania

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 6 guests