To this point, it's been an entertaining bowl season

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
George S. Patton

To this point, it's been an entertaining bowl season

Post by George S. Patton »

There have been about three non-competitive games, but the rest have been pretty solid. About 6-7 have been decided by a touchdown or less and two went into overtime.

General college football fans may not like it, but you can't tell me the coaches and kids and the team's fans don't get into it. Yes, some of the matchups aren't appetizing -- CMU-Fla Atl. and La Tech-NIU -- but during the regular season, most of us weren't paying attention to these teams anyway.

The general reaction to when they win is pretty euphoric. These teams are playing the incentive to win and are not going through the motions.
Again, I am not in favor of a playoff for reasons I explained about a month ago.

Best games to me so far:
1. West Virginia-UNC
2. Missouri-Northwestern
3. TCU-Boise St.
4. California-Miami
5. Wake Forest-Navy
User avatar
giacfsp
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1852
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Dallas

Post by giacfsp »

No mention of the Little 10-11 starting the bowl season 0-2?
User avatar
OC Mustang
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1899
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Marshall TX (formerly Laguna Niguel CA)

Re: To this point, it's been an entertaining bowl season

Post by OC Mustang »

George S. Patton wrote:There have been about three non-competitive games, but the rest have been pretty solid. About 6-7 have been decided by a touchdown or less and two went into overtime.

General college football fans may not like it, but you can't tell me the coaches and kids and the team's fans don't get into it. Yes, some of the matchups aren't appetizing -- CMU-Fla Atl. and La Tech-NIU -- but during the regular season, most of us weren't paying attention to these teams anyway.

The general reaction to when they win is pretty euphoric. These teams are playing the incentive to win and are not going through the motions.
Again, I am not in favor of a playoff for reasons I explained about a month ago.

Best games to me so far:
1. West Virginia-UNC
2. Missouri-Northwestern
3. TCU-Boise St.
4. California-Miami
5. Wake Forest-Navy


You can say what you want...La Tech vs. NIU at the Independence Bowl was pretty cool to those of us who went. I'm not a fan of either team, but it was an easy bowl game to get into...not very expensive. Fun pre-game tailgating (it's Louisiana, after all). Was good to take kids too (a little chilly, but not too bad). Complete w/ jumbo corndogs, bratwurst, Dr. Pepper, and pizza. It was a competitive game...sure, the talent isn't some of these others you mentioned, but it was worth it nonetheless.

The bigger bowl games are certainly more appealing vis-a-vis talent. They may even be more fun. I dunno. I do know that this bowl game (and I suspect ones like it) are indeed opportunities for dads like me to hang out with their sons and daughters. And THAT, to me, is worth any 50 big bowl games. Just my humble opinion.
"Moderation in all things, and especially in Absoluts [vodka]." The Benediction, Doc Breeden, circa 1992
ReedFrawg
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Re: To this point, it's been an entertaining bowl season

Post by ReedFrawg »

General - you can still have bowl games and a playoff system...

George S. Patton wrote:There have been about three non-competitive games, but the rest have been pretty solid. About 6-7 have been decided by a touchdown or less and two went into overtime.

General college football fans may not like it, but you can't tell me the coaches and kids and the team's fans don't get into it. Yes, some of the matchups aren't appetizing -- CMU-Fla Atl. and La Tech-NIU -- but during the regular season, most of us weren't paying attention to these teams anyway.

The general reaction to when they win is pretty euphoric. These teams are playing the incentive to win and are not going through the motions.
Again, I am not in favor of a playoff for reasons I explained about a month ago.

Best games to me so far:
1. West Virginia-UNC
2. Missouri-Northwestern
3. TCU-Boise St.
4. California-Miami
5. Wake Forest-Navy
George S. Patton

Post by George S. Patton »

giacfsp wrote:No mention of the Little 10-11 starting the bowl season 0-2?


I think I mentioned on a thread that was canned that the conference was probably going to win one or two of them. And I said Wisconsin and Northwestern weren't going to be either one of them.

I'm not disappointed in Wisconsin because I have no love for the Red Army. Disappointed that Northwestern didn't finish despite the gifts Chase Daniel gave the Wildcats.

By no means does it diminsh my loyalty to that conference. But I also recognize its shortcomings.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Post by abezontar »

bowl season...meh?
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
Troup32
Scout Team
Scout Team
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Sep 08, 2002 3:01 am
Location: Troup, TX

Post by Troup32 »

George S. Patton wrote:... that conference. But I also recognize its shortcomings.
Hard not to - the list is long.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Post by Pony_Fan »

68 Teams go bowling, 51 do not. How exciting!!


The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order:

Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.
George S. Patton

Post by George S. Patton »

Pony_Fan wrote:68 Teams go bowling, 51 do not. How exciting!!


The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order:

Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.


Not really concerned about that.
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Post by Pony_Fan »

That's fine.

Just makes more people say "who cares" if they win. Attendance at most of them is laughable.

Enjoy the games.
User avatar
abezontar
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3888
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Mustang, TX

Post by abezontar »

Pony_Fan wrote:68 Teams go bowling, 51 do not. How exciting!!


The unlucky 51, in alphabetical order:

Akron, Arizona State, Arkansas, Arkansas State, Army, Auburn, Baylor, Bowling Green, Colorado, Duke, Eastern Michigan, Florida International, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa State, Kansas State, Kent State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Louisiana-Monroe, Louisville, Marshall, Miami (Ohio), Michigan, Middle Tennessee, Mississippi State, New Mexico, New Mexico State, North Texas, Ohio, Purdue, SMU, San Diego State, San Jose State, Stanford, Syracuse, Temple, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Toledo, Tulane, UAB, UCF, UCLA, UNLV, UTEP, Utah State, Virginia, Washington, Washington State and Wyoming.


Honestly, bowl games don't seem like a reward anymore, which makes it much more pathetic that we haven't gotten to one since the 80s.
The donkey's name is Kiki.

On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?

Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
Post Reply