Washington St site views SMU as a "sure thing"

[SMU 86]

The article is titled, "Cougs need more SMU's on schedule." This is a little too much confidence. Here is the link.

http://tinyurl.com/WSUsite

[gostangs]

And why would they not until we prove it otherwise?

[CalallenStang]

Let's show them that Ponies rule the Palouse.

[RGV Pony]

I would think every D1 team in America could use more SMU on the schedule.

[SMU 86]

Let's show them that Ponies rule the Palouse.

I agree. They are putting us in the same category as Texas State and North Texas, whom they have played in the past.

[RedRiverPony]

Wow. I'd say neither team is in position to consider any game "a sure thing."

Hope we whip them up and down the field.

[ponyte]

If JJ can make significant strides on the defensive side of the ball by next season, then it isn't a sure thing for other mediocre teams. We need a much stronger defense to be competitive. This recruiting class and the offseason should give us a hint as to how the defense will perform next season. Will it be the same, worse (is that possible?) or better will determine a lot about our season.

[CalallenStang]

I will be excited for next season if our offense looks dismal to non-existent at training camp.

[RednBlue11]

the clash of the incompetent.

[ponyplayer]

I always consider myself "a sure thing"..............

[RednBlue11]

I always consider myself "a sure thing"..............

thanks to enzyte

[SMUtrojanFAN]

That article looks like it was written by an 8 year old.

[huskerpony]

When you start scheduling games as "a sure thing," your program ends up in big trouble! (See Michigan--Appalachian St!)

.....Not that Wazzu's program isn't already in trouble.

[jtstang]

SMU=

[smupony94]

I would love a sure thing right now