10 schools that should get more blue chips (SMU)

by **The PonyGrad** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 11:24 am

From the sporting news.

http://www.sportingnews.com/experts/dave-curtis/blog/1083726-p.html

by **NavyCrimson** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:04 pm

Doesn't have a grasp of reality when it comes to the alignment within college football. Get rid of the BCS-BS & those schools, including SMU would get more blue chips :idea:

Blue chips like winning & going to "national" championships. Why go to a school that will never be allowed to take part in the mythical national championship??? :?:

by **PonySnob** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:23 pm

NavyCrimson wrote:Doesn't have a grasp of reality when it comes to the alignment within college football. Get rid of the BCS-BS & those schools, including SMU would get more blue chips Blue chips like winning & going to "national" championships. Why go to a school that will never be allowed to take part in the mythical national championship???

Or a program that has only had two "non-losing" seasons in almost 20 years.......................

by **NavyCrimson** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:36 pm

Well said! :idea:

by **Pony_Fan** » Sat Feb 07, 2009 9:05 pm

that's why hoops will always be better...

by **NavyCrimson** » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:09 am

Good point pony'. At least it has the potential with the current cartel arrangement in college football.

by **SoCal_Pony** » Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:27 am

SMU should be just as successful in the non-BCS world as UT is in the BCS-world.

Top 25 in FootballÃ¢â‚¬Â¦.occasionally
Top 25 in BasketballÃ¢â‚¬Â¦consistently

by **Stallion** » Sun Feb 08, 2009 12:25 pm

by **NavyCrimson** » Sun Feb 08, 2009 4:21 pm

by **SoCal_Pony** » Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:23 am

I guess it is how you define Top 25.

If SMU runs the table in C-USA and wins its bowl game, yes, it is consistent Top 25 in the rankings.

Just donÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t know if any team from this weak conference truly deserves to be Top 25 in FB.

BB is another story. No reason we canÃ¢â‚¬â„¢t compete with ANYONE.

by **Stallion** » Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:33 am

You really don't think that now that we have basically decided to do the same thing that TCU has done for years that SMU can't possibly hope to compete with TCU? Or for that matter any non-BCS school. Tulsa? UTEP? Tulane? Rice? Best football facility in CUSA West and a Top Coach with a national reputation? We need to give our Coaches time to build their programs-4-5 years of solid recruiting, not 2 before we try to run them off- but I don't see any reason SMU can't accomplish much of what TCU has done-I don't see any reason SMU can't be the dominant non-BCS program at least in this part of the country. Quite frankly we need to reestablish the DFW Metroplex recruiting pipeline-the rest will take care of itself.

by **SoCal_Pony** » Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:39 am

us YES...other C-USA schools...not as optimistic.

btw...I have always thought that if SMU was in the BCS system, in time we could be the 2nd best school in Texas.

10 schools that should get more blue chips (SMU)

10 schools that should get more blue chips (SMU)

Who is online