|
PonyFans.com •
Board Index •
Around the Hilltop •
Football •
Recruiting •
Basketball •
Other Sports
This is the forum for talk about SMU Football
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
by soccermom » Tue Feb 01, 2011 7:12 am
All valid points and they all make sense. Thanks for the insight.
-

soccermom

-
- Posts: 3361
- Joined: Sat Nov 07, 2009 9:48 am
- Location: League City, Tx
by abezontar » Tue Feb 01, 2011 8:57 am
lightning
The donkey's name is Kiki.
On a side note, anybody need a patent attorney?
Good, Bad...I'm the one with the gun.
-

abezontar

-
- Posts: 3888
- Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Mustang, TX
by BIGHORSE » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:15 am
Every time the news reports that the Packers will move practice from S.M.U. to H.P. high it's kind of embarrassing. 
-

BIGHORSE

-
- Posts: 2882
- Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2004 7:49 pm
by Pony_Fan » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:30 am
ponyscott wrote:Pony_Fan wrote: And even with the Texas heat, it would be much better for the staff and players.
Do you forget?......we have 110 degree summers...they need cooler practices..rain be damned
yes - I got that sir
-

Pony_Fan

-
- Posts: 6130
- Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas,Tx, USA
by 35straight » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:41 am
The intramural field is not an option for grass practices. It is used year round by the entire campus. Mostly just rocks and dirt. That’s not the kind of field we want our guys on. How about Wescott?
-

35straight

-
- Posts: 1769
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2005 9:49 am
- Location: Back in the Big "D"
by ponyte » Tue Feb 01, 2011 9:53 am
With the potential for short weeks (TV scheduled games) the need for max number of practice reps is paramount. As mrydel put it, practice in the rain decreases reps and the quality of those reps. An IPF allows for max practice and improves the quality of those reps as opposed to reps in rain.
As with anything else, practice, practice, practice improves execution. An IPF improves the potential to maximize practice time regardless of weather.
In the bad old days, when weather was an issue, SMU practiced in Moody. The reps just were not the same. One, contact is limited and two, the space decreases the type of pas routes that can be run. Defense and offense share the same limited space. The practice is of poor quality and not a good representation of the playing conditions one will see come game day .
-

ponyte

-
- Posts: 11212
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
-
by HB Pony Dad » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:57 am
CoxMustangFan wrote:BIGHORSE wrote:Every time the news reports that the Packers will move practice from S.M.U. to H.P. high it's kind of embarrassing. 
Not kind of embarrassing...VERY embarrassing!
As a Cox student you should be aware of the basic benefits of the Traditional Management Style... 
SMU - IT'S YOUR TURN FIRE JUNE JONES USC Trojan for Life and SMU Dad!
-

HB Pony Dad

-
- Posts: 3950
- Joined: Tue Jul 01, 2008 1:35 pm
- Location: Huntington Beach, California
by Billy Joe » Tue Feb 01, 2011 10:57 am
Agree - if SMU is serious about being top 25 then an indoor practice facility is needed for recruiting and to ensure you can maximize the practice opportunities. I really don't understand why one does not get built. It seems SMU talks about something for a long time before action when other schools take action quicker. It is real frusterating.
-

Billy Joe

-
- Posts: 946
- Joined: Thu Jul 14, 2005 11:34 am
by EastStang » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:27 am
IPF is nice, but lets be a little thoughtful about this. We needed to get an Education Department so that recruits could major in PE. That took a lot of cash. We need a new natatorium for swimming. There are plenty of needs.
UNC better keep that Ram away from Peruna
-
EastStang

-
- Posts: 12681
- Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am
by gostangs » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:36 am
We are being thoughtful. As soon as swimming draws more then parents and groupies they will get their facility - until then, IPF has jumped the line.
-
gostangs

-
- Posts: 12315
- Joined: Mon Dec 02, 2002 4:01 am
- Location: Dallas, Texas USA
by friarwolf » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:46 am
My vote would be to make the soccer field the indoor facility. The soccer guys and gals get to play indoors rather than sweat and freeze outdoors and June gets his indoor practice facility.......
-
friarwolf

-
- Posts: 1964
- Joined: Thu Jul 21, 2005 9:31 am
by goldenstang » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:46 am
While an IPF's primary function is for football, it can be used for other sports as well
-

goldenstang

-
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 3:45 am
by DanFreibergerForHeisman » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:48 am
friarwolf wrote:My vote would be to make the soccer field the indoor facility. The soccer guys and gals get to play indoors rather than sweat and freeze outdoors and June gets his indoor practice facility.......
Yeah - we'll just roll the grass out like they do in Arizona. Or build it with a retractable roof.
Shake It Off Moody
-

DanFreibergerForHeisman

-
- Posts: 16485
- Joined: Mon Jul 24, 2000 3:01 am
-
by CalallenStang » Tue Feb 01, 2011 11:49 am
CoxMustangFan wrote:I still don't understand where they'll put one. Would they doze the retail center next to the stadium and put it there??
No. The retail center is slated for future student apartments on top of retail (an urbanism concept)
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
by CalallenStang » Tue Feb 01, 2011 12:23 pm
CoxMustangFan wrote:CalallenStang wrote:CoxMustangFan wrote:I still don't understand where they'll put one. Would they doze the retail center next to the stadium and put it there??
No. The retail center is slated for future student apartments on top of retail (an urbanism concept)
Well, let's just put apartmetns on top of the IPF. Now that would be cool! 
I don't know where the water table is, but it would be awesome to have the IPF under Ford Stadium.
-

CalallenStang

-
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
Return to Football
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 1 guest
|
|