The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

East Coast Mustang · Post by **East Coast Mustang** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:39 pm

Funniest thing I've seen on the internet in awhile...this guy can't be serious

http://big12united.com/

CalallenStang · Post by **CalallenStang** » Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:48 pm

TWALV33 · Post by **TWALV33** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:15 am

Junior · Post by **Junior** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:54 am

i like the assertion that the addition of Rice would make Houston a Big 12 city and would "deliver" that city.

does this guy work for The Onion? if not, he should.

deepellumfrog · Post by **deepellumfrog** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 11:03 am

outrageous

MustangStealth · Post by **MustangStealth** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:44 pm

I like the "one man's trash is another man's treasure" quote about UTEP. So... you're admitting that UTEP is CUSA trash.

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 12:49 pm

Isn't this what everyone else said about SMU2BIG12 and SMU2BCS?

DiamondM75 · Post by **DiamondM75** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:43 pm

Proof that the more degrees a person acquires, the less they are in touch with reality.

zimo · Post by **zimo** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:23 pm

Just a reminder there are people on this board that think SMU is a good fit for the SEC.

TWALV33 · Post by **TWALV33** » Tue Sep 11, 2012 10:35 pm

zimo wrote:Just a reminder there are people on this board that think SMU is a good fit for the SEC.

Are you saying we aren't?

DiamondM75 · Post by **DiamondM75** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:32 am

zimo wrote:Just a reminder there are people on this board that think SMU is a good fit for the SEC.

We are only 1 to 1 1/2 recruiting classes away.

MustangStealth · Post by **MustangStealth** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:33 am

zimo wrote:Just a reminder there are people on this board that think SMU is a good fit for the SEC.

Judging by their new members, they are looking for punching bags. We'd be great!

couch 'em · Post by **couch 'em** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 9:47 am

I think people on this board think Dallas would be a good fit to add to the SEC, and we just happen to be here, not that SMU brings any inherant value. I agree with this

SMU_Alumni11 · Post by **SMU_Alumni11** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:02 pm

I'd rather be the punching bag of the SEC than mid level in a broken BE. Because there is always a chance to become mid level or better, but in a broken conference it may not even matter

zimo · Post by **zimo** » Wed Sep 12, 2012 1:08 pm

couch 'em wrote:I think people on this board think Dallas would be a good fit to add to the SEC, and we just happen to be here, not that SMU brings any inherant value. I agree with this

I agree that Dallas would be a good fit. It's just an unrealistic jump to make in the near future.

The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12

Re: The case for UTEP and Rice in the Big 12