gostangs wrote:there were a couple of positive signs in this game - hands on ground, better innovation, Fuller and others.
if we can get rid of the jog to the coach, and get a two back formation inside the ten (maybe even with a tight end) then we will be getting somewhere. next year maybe even a hurry up.
lets send June tapes of La Tech and A&M and let him study -up.
Amazing we didny implement any of last years UH ideas from Sumlin -
Obviously the hurry up causes problems - what a great hire for A&M - i am sure Phillips is pissed he didnt go with
Treadway21 wrote:We did use another run play, the zone read. GG ran it very well and almost got to 100 yards. I am hopeful JJ will continue to run the next couple of weeks. Kudos to JJ where kudos are due.
Per June, we only use one running play, so the zone read must be what we have been using all along (just without the option of the QB keeping)
Junior wrote:Ha! Now we're complaining that we can only get 225 on the ground.
No, we are complaining about June's lack of innovation on offense. If we had more than one running play, we might be less predictable and be able to get more yards on the ground AND in the air.
Junior wrote:Ha! Now we're complaining that we can only get 225 on the ground.
No, we are complaining about June's lack of innovation on offense. If we had more than one running play, we might be less predictable and be able to get more yards on the ground AND in the air.
It's one running play with a number of variations. It's not a single defined running play.
Junior wrote:Ha! Now we're complaining that we can only get 225 on the ground.
No, we are complaining about June's lack of innovation on offense. If we had more than one running play, we might be less predictable and be able to get more yards on the ground AND in the air.
It's one running play with a number of variations. It's not a single defined running play.
Too bad we don't have two running plays with a number of variations.
CalallenStang wrote:
No, we are complaining about June's lack of innovation on offense. If we had more than one running play, we might be less predictable and be able to get more yards on the ground AND in the air.
It's one running play with a number of variations. It's not a single defined running play.
Too bad we don't have two running plays with a number of variations.
We do actually. One with Zach, one with GG. JJ is mistaken.
- wouldn't that be funny to send him that book