What the "Group of Five" should do
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
- CalallenStang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
What the "Group of Five" should do
Break off from the NCAA and pay players in football and basketball. Get all of the top recruits through payments of players. Get good contracts by having all of the best players. Invite a few select "Power Five" schools to join as well in order to kill off the NCAA.
- SMU21TCU10
- PonyFans.com Legend
- Posts: 4347
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:07 pm
- Location: Mos Eisley, Tatooine
Re: What the "Group of Five" should do
I am sure most players at BCs schools already get perks worth more than most of the non BCS teams could offer
- ponyte
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 11223
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
- Contact:
Re: What the "Group of Five" should do
What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.
And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
Re: What the "Group of Five" should do
Except the players. LOL.ponyte wrote: The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
#HammerDown
- CalallenStang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
Re: What the "Group of Five" should do
You are assuming that we would pay them an amount equal to what they are currently getting. That is a faulty assumption.ponyte wrote:What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.
And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
- ponyte
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 11223
- Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
- Contact:
Re: What the
Exactly. On an open market the price would probably be much higher. And once those prices are known, and then the practice for the amateur status would increase as well though probably not as much.CalallenStang wrote:You are assuming that we would pay them an amount equal to what they are currently getting. That is a faulty assumption.ponyte wrote:What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.
And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
- CalallenStang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 19359
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
- Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track
Re: What the
The "probably not as much" is the key to success. That, plus inviting a few select "Power 5" schools to come along as well.ponyte wrote:Exactly. On an open market the price would probably be much higher. And once those prices are known, and then the practice for the amateur status would increase as well though probably not as much.CalallenStang wrote:You are assuming that we would pay them an amount equal to what they are currently getting. That is a faulty assumption.ponyte wrote:What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.
And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
Re: What the "Group of Five" should do
Now that the big 5 are getting some $90mm + each, this is exactly what I expect THEY will do to further squeeze out the remainder.