What the "Group of Five" should do

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Post Reply
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

What the "Group of Five" should do

Post by CalallenStang »

Break off from the NCAA and pay players in football and basketball. Get all of the top recruits through payments of players. Get good contracts by having all of the best players. Invite a few select "Power Five" schools to join as well in order to kill off the NCAA.
User avatar
SMU21TCU10
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4347
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 8:07 pm
Location: Mos Eisley, Tatooine

Re: What the "Group of Five" should do

Post by SMU21TCU10 »

I am sure most players at BCs schools already get perks worth more than most of the non BCS teams could offer
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
Contact:

Re: What the "Group of Five" should do

Post by ponyte »

What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.

And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
Rebel10
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12534
Joined: Thu Sep 10, 2009 10:20 pm

Re: What the "Group of Five" should do

Post by Rebel10 »

ponyte wrote: The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
Except the players. LOL.
#HammerDown
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: What the "Group of Five" should do

Post by CalallenStang »

ponyte wrote:What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.

And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
You are assuming that we would pay them an amount equal to what they are currently getting. That is a faulty assumption.
User avatar
ponyte
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11223
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Nw Orleans, LA region
Contact:

Re: What the

Post by ponyte »

CalallenStang wrote:
ponyte wrote:What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.

And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
You are assuming that we would pay them an amount equal to what they are currently getting. That is a faulty assumption.
Exactly. On an open market the price would probably be much higher. And once those prices are known, and then the practice for the amateur status would increase as well though probably not as much.
User avatar
CalallenStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 19359
Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2005 9:43 pm
Location: 25 feet from the Hillcrest track

Re: What the

Post by CalallenStang »

ponyte wrote:
CalallenStang wrote:
ponyte wrote:What moron athlete would agree to such a system? As of now, all the goodies they receive are unreported income and thus no taxes paid. In the system presented above, any athlete that was openly paid would be at a financial disadvantage as compared to the continuation of the "amateur" status of the NCAA by at least Social Security, Medicare and income taxes.

And the organizations that pay them would then have to carry unemployment insurance, part of Medicare and Social Security taxes and workers comp. It just isn't good economics. The current system saves all involved money and has the appearance of propriety.
You are assuming that we would pay them an amount equal to what they are currently getting. That is a faulty assumption.
Exactly. On an open market the price would probably be much higher. And once those prices are known, and then the practice for the amateur status would increase as well though probably not as much.
The "probably not as much" is the key to success. That, plus inviting a few select "Power 5" schools to come along as well.
User avatar
SMU89
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 5216
Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2007 5:19 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: What the "Group of Five" should do

Post by SMU89 »

Now that the big 5 are getting some $90mm + each, this is exactly what I expect THEY will do to further squeeze out the remainder.
Post Reply