Big East TV offer
Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower
Re: Big East TV offer
What is the MWC $$ TV deal?
- couch 'em
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 9758
- Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: Farmers Branch
Re: Big East TV offer
If we keep backing into bowl games we will never upgrade coaches. We need a strong season to fail to enable success later.Maine Mustang wrote:Say what you want, but without a SFAustin type game on the schedule we likely wouldn't have gone to a bowl this year and likely would not sniff a bowl opportunity in 2013. The overall talent level and depth isn't what it should be at this point (another discussion), and I like the change.
"I think Couchem is right."
-EVERYONE
-EVERYONE
Re: Big East TV offer
TBD. They split 8 million 12 ways from CBSCS and their tier 3 network "the Mtn" has been killed off for about a year now so it's old rights will be sold off differently going forward.GiddyUp wrote:What is the MWC $$ TV deal?
My understanding of the deal that brought Boise back:
1- So you can be sure the 8 mil will pay each 888k or so
2- They will sell BSU's home rights seperately. If a school gets a game on ESPN, ESPN2, ABC, NBC, CBS etc they will get an appearance fee of:
500k for a Saturday game on those networks
300k for another day
Money from BSU's games AFTER those stipends will be split evenly.
3- They talked their tv partner into letting them sell some additional inventory. This will likely be split evenly.
So it's up in the air but I doubt the non-Boise teams will clear 2mm.
Probably something near their old 1.2mm per team figure when TCU was there.
- Water Pony
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun May 13, 2001 3:01 am
- Location: Chicagoland
Re: Big East TV offer
I dislike this option. It is dispiriting and assumes a better outcome, as a result, without any assurance things will get better. It is similar to letting your party lose at the polls to teach "someone?" a lesson. As a result, the country (SMU fans) suffers.couch 'em wrote:If we keep backing into bowl games we will never upgrade coaches. We need a strong season to fail to enable success later.Maine Mustang wrote:Say what you want, but without a SFAustin type game on the schedule we likely wouldn't have gone to a bowl this year and likely would not sniff a bowl opportunity in 2013. The overall talent level and depth isn't what it should be at this point (another discussion), and I like the change.
The goal is for the athletes is to win every game. They only have four years to play. Why sacrifice one or two intentionally?
Pony Up
- Bergermeister
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7132
- Joined: Sun Jul 28, 2002 3:01 am
- Location: University Park
Re: Big East TV offer
That'll show'em - adios, mo-foWE ARE BACK wrote: I have had tickets since 2001 and I will not be renewing my tickets if Baylor is replaced with Montana State.

- SMUer
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 5276
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
- Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America
Re: Big East TV offer
I like it or not, that is how the sane fan thinks. SMU can't afford to be ubber-fan exclusionary with its fans.
- East Coast Mustang
- PonyFans.com Super Legend
- Posts: 7435
- Joined: Sat May 21, 2005 8:35 am
Re: Big East TV offer
These figures are depressing, but it's our best hope right now. Still more $ than the MWC, and exposure in the Big East= more eyeballs= more $. Half of America is asleep in the second half of most MWC games now.
2005 PonyFans.com Rookie of the Year Award Recipient