If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

by **SMU 86** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 8:58 am

Conference is really the only thing that counts pretty much. Beat MSU.

by **sbsmith** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:05 am

June, is that you?

by **Rebel10** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 9:13 am

He sounds like that loser Horsepower. Horsepower said that he EXPECTED to lose against Tech. I am willing to say Boise St would not have expected to lose against Tech (a mid to lower tier BCS team) nor would a pre BCS TCU have expected to lose against Tech. They would have come in ready to execute and win even if they didn't.

by **SMU2007** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 10:48 am

I would be embarrassed to go to a BCS game if we lose to an incredibly mediocre big 12 team like that, and are sure to get stomped by a&m and TCU.

by **Grant Carter** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 1:56 pm

Rebel10 wrote:He sounds like that loser Horsepower. Horsepower said that he EXPECTED to lose against Tech. I am willing to say Boise St would not have expected to lose against Tech (a mid to lower tier BCS team) nor would a pre BCS TCU have expected to lose against Tech. They would have come in ready to execute and win even if they didn't.

Wait, are you saying that anyone who predicted the loss last night is a loser? What is wrong with being correct?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

by **Pony in SA** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:01 pm

Turn on Cincinnati, no way we beat them on road. Bigger, faster than us

by **PonySnob** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 2:42 pm

SMU 86 wrote:Conference is really the only thing that counts pretty much. Beat MSU.

We all know what JJ "penciled in" for the non-conference record this year.......

by **Grant Carter** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 3:52 pm

Cougar King wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:Conference is really the only thing that counts pretty much. Beat MSU.

That is a loser's mentality. Thank God, nobody at UH thinks like this.

honest question: are there many/any SMU fans who consistently post about non-SMU related things on the Houston message boards?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

by **Cougar King** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:20 pm

Grant Carter wrote:
Cougar King wrote:
SMU 86 wrote:Conference is really the only thing that counts pretty much. Beat MSU.

That is a loser's mentality. Thank God, nobody at UH thinks like this.
honest question: are there many/any SMU fans who consistently post about non-SMU related things on the Houston message boards?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

No, not really. Are you implying that you agree with him?

by **Grant Carter** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 5:24 pm

Cougar King wrote:
Grant Carter wrote:
Cougar King wrote:[quote="SMU 86"]Conference is really the only thing that counts pretty much. Beat MSU.

That is a loser's mentality. Thank God, nobody at UH thinks like this.
honest question: are there many/any SMU fans who consistently post about non-SMU related things on the Houston message boards?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

No, not really. Are you implying that you agree with him?[/quote]
I do not think I was implying anything. As i said, it was an honest question.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free

by **LHS81** » Sat Aug 31, 2013 7:01 pm

I could be wrong, which wouldn't be the first nor last time. . . I think he's implying that you need to concentrate on your customers at 7-11, instead of posting non-SMU subjects on an SMU message board. . . just sayin.

by **Charleston Pony** » Sun Sep 01, 2013 1:45 pm

Cougar King is just doing his part to try and build the SMU/Houston rivalry. While TCU might be the school we consider to be our rivals, Houston is suddenly the only holdover conference mate we have from the old SWC days. Let's hope SMU vs Houston can become a premier rivalry within the AAC. I think UCF vs USF has great potential, but being in the 2 largest cities in Texas is what helped us get into the Big East and there is no reason that both schools shouldn't be competing at the top of the standings in both football and bball

as for the original message posted in this thread, the schedule sets up favorably for SMU by not having to play Louisville so the question is, would you be proud or embarrassed to be in a BCS game with a record of 9-3 or even 8-4? I think we would all acknowledge we were handed a gift, but I would still be very proud of these guys if they could pull that off.

by **PonySnob** » Sun Sep 01, 2013 7:03 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:as for the original message posted in this thread, the schedule sets up favorably for SMU by not having to play Louisville so the question is, would you be proud or embarrassed to be in a BCS game with a record of 9-3 or even 8-4? I think we would all acknowledge we were handed a gift, but I would still be very proud of these guys if they could pull that off.

It would be great, but the result would similar to Hawaii vs Georgia......not TCU vs Wisconsin.

by **fifty** » Sun Sep 01, 2013 9:25 pm

If we beat Cincinnati I will pass out.

by **ponyfan777** » Tue Sep 03, 2013 7:47 am

Have we really stooped this low!

If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Re: If we go 1-3 or 0-4 we can still win conference

Who is online