PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

Texas Football.com reads pony fans

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMU_Alumni11 » Thu Oct 17, 2013 11:04 am

Nevertheless our defense typically isn't the problem in the pass. They usually hold up their end until they realize the offense will never score even when they get turnovers. Theres no doubt this year's defense blows to say the least, but I mean I'm not going to fault him for one bad year when the other side of the ball hasnt been spot on really ever (unless of course in Hawaii).
User avatar
SMU_Alumni11
PonyFans.com Legend
 
Posts: 3654
Joined: Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:04 am
Location: Somewhere near Knox

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMUer » Thu Oct 17, 2013 5:16 pm

Mason is butt-hurt about the Nevada job...as checked as June is...we have better defensive athletes than last year...why no blitzing?
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby Grant Carter » Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:07 pm

SMUer wrote:Mason is butt-hurt about the Nevada job...as checked as June is...we have better defensive athletes than last year...why no blitzing?

Sometimes people try their best and it is not good enough. Why do you think not getting that job would make him not try his hardest?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMUer » Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:25 pm

Because this defense rolls out the most vanilla scheme week after week...like nothing we've seen before...and I don't think there is a drop off of talent to justify it
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMU2007 » Thu Oct 17, 2013 9:52 pm

mrydel wrote:As an example, Arkansas took the opening kickoff against South Carolina, moved right down the field and quickly scored a touchdown. Not only looked competitive but rather dominant. After that they ran 36 more plays in the entire game. 52-7 South Carolina. Short term competive just does not count.

Thank you mrydel. Tired of the "but we played them close for a half!" business.
User avatar
SMU2007
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5561
Joined: Mon Oct 16, 2006 5:41 am

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby LakeHighlandsPony » Thu Oct 17, 2013 10:55 pm

mrydel wrote:As an example, Arkansas took the opening kickoff against South Carolina, moved right down the field and quickly scored a touchdown. Not only looked competitive but rather dominant. After that they ran 36 more plays in the entire game. 52-7 South Carolina. Short term competive just does not count.


Well look who is Mr. Negative all the sudden! :D

I had to do it. I hope you and ARkpony, Ponyte and the rest of the Arky Mafia have safe travels to Memphis.
User avatar
LakeHighlandsPony
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2558
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2004 8:50 am
Location: The Boneyard

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby Grant Carter » Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:34 am

SMUer wrote:Because this defense rolls out the most vanilla scheme week after week...like nothing we've seen before...and I don't think there is a drop off of talent to justify it

That does not address the question of why not getting the Nevada job would cause him to stop trying his hardest, it just explains what you think he is doing wrong.
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMUer » Fri Oct 18, 2013 12:11 pm

I don't know, let me ask him?...???

He doesn't get a job and suddenly his formerly aggressive defensive scheme is reduced to something shockingly passive and un-creative...He clearly is not trying his hardest. As to why Mason has a sudden change in philosophy...perhaps it's not getting the Nevada job...perhaps it's the general ennui on the sideline that has gotten to him...IDK
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby Grant Carter » Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:16 pm

SMUer wrote:I don't know, let me ask him?...???

He doesn't get a job and suddenly his formerly aggressive defensive scheme is reduced to something shockingly passive and un-creative...He clearly is not trying his hardest. As to why Mason has a sudden change in philosophy...perhaps it's not getting the Nevada job...perhaps it's the general ennui on the sideline that has gotten to him...IDK

Maybe he thinks this is the best approach? Not a possibility in your mind?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMUer » Fri Oct 18, 2013 5:33 pm

The "best" approach is to not blitz, not confuse the offense and not really worry about putting pressure on the QB? Is your goal just to appear "level-headed", even if what you are saying doesn't make any sense?
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby Grant Carter » Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:17 pm

SMUer wrote:The "best" approach is to not blitz, not confuse the offense and not really worry about putting pressure on the QB? Is your goal just to appear "level-headed", even if what you are saying doesn't make any sense?

My goal is to understand why you are not willing to consider any other option than that he is not trying his hardest. What possible benefit does he get from running a defense that is getting lit up?

Why is it not possible that he is doing what he thinks is best and it is just not good enough? It is possible that you are right that he is not using the best approach, but isn't it possible/likely that he thinks it is the best approach?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free
Grant Carter
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2791
Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 8:40 am

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMUer » Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:05 pm

Because I can go to the last page of every defensive ranking and find on the NCAA website and see "SMU" near the bottom of the list.

2013: #98 total defense, #123 scoring defense, #57 rushing defense, tied for second to last place in 3rd Down Conv Defense, #106 passing defense

In 2012 and previous years Mason had us +50 spaces higher. Explanation? Then there is the eye-ball test...no blitzes, nothing resembling previous seasons, no QB pressure. Yes, Davis, Reed and Pittman are gone but Mason across-the-board has bigger, quicker guys. Something is funky and no explanation I can think of involves Mason trying hard.
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby ReedFrawg » Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:12 pm

SMUer wrote:Because I can go to the last page of every defensive ranking and find on the NCAA website and see "SMU" near the bottom of the list.

2013: #98 total defense, #123 scoring defense, #57 rushing defense, tied for second to last place in 3rd Down Conv Defense, #106 passing defense

In 2012 and previous years Mason had us +50 spaces higher. Explanation? Then there is the eye-ball test...no blitzes, nothing resembling previous seasons, no QB pressure. Yes, Davis, Reed and Pittman are gone but Mason across-the-board has bigger, quicker guys. Something is funky and no explanation I can think of involves Mason trying hard.


He might be getting out coached or out schemed but it seems ridiculous to say he is not trying. You have no proof of that. I have questioned our playcalling on offense all year but would never accuse a coacj of not trying. They just aren't wired that way....your argument makes no sense.
ReedFrawg
Heisman
 
Posts: 1936
Joined: Wed Feb 05, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Fort Worth, TX, US

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby mrydel » Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:14 pm

We do not have the secondary to handle a lot of blitzing. Acker is all we have that can handle man to man coverage. Everyone keep reporting how the secondary was our strength but it is not. Is is the most experienced but not our strength. Always sounds good to say blitz, blitz, blitz, but when the blitz is picked up, which it usually is in our case, then we are giving up big plays.
All those who believe in psycho kinesis, raise my hand
User avatar
mrydel
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 32035
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2003 4:01 am
Location: Sherwood,AR,USA

Re: Texas Football.com reads pony fans

Postby SMUer » Fri Oct 18, 2013 11:19 pm

I think the worst thing you can do to a weak secondary is make them defense a relentless passing attack with no pressure...QBs could read a book back there
User avatar
SMUer
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 5276
Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 12:03 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas, The United States of America

PreviousNext

Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests