PonyFans.comBoard IndexAround the HilltopFootballRecruitingBasketballOther Sports

This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby Dwan » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:35 pm

Pathetic. A football program is the best way to market your school. For 25 years we have been marketing that we are pathetic with a few signs of being mediocre.
User avatar
Dwan
Heisman
 
Posts: 1424
Joined: Tue Oct 26, 2004 4:10 pm

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby Charleston Pony » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:36 pm

we always look good when we get a national TV game
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28960
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby birddogger » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:09 pm

I hate to say this, but, this program isn't going any direction but down. We are back to the pre-JJ days but without the excuses the previous coaches had. Sad.
User avatar
birddogger
All-American
 
Posts: 548
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 6:24 pm

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby Treadway21 » Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:22 pm

Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins.
-- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Treadway21
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6586
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby Charleston Pony » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:26 pm

Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28960
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby BRStang » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:43 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's


I disagree
Geaux MUSTANGS! Geaux Tigers!
User avatar
BRStang
Hall of Famer
 
Posts: 2850
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 10:26 am
Location: Baton Rouge, Louisiana

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby Treadway21 » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:52 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's
maybe - you could make that argument, but we have no excuse for not being competitive like we did post DP. This Houston team is not as good as any SWC team from the 90s and Tech and TCU turned out to be very mediocre teams.

This team looked totally unprepared not physically outclassed. That in my mind is the difference.
An atheist is a guy who watches a Notre Dame-SMU football game and
doesn't care who wins.
-- Dwight D. Eisenhower
User avatar
Treadway21
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 6586
Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2004 2:14 pm
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby redpony » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:56 pm

yep- unprepared, unmotivated and had a very poor game plan. Not a good recipe for a novice QB.
redpony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 10968
Joined: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:44 am
Location: on the beach,northern Peru

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Postby Charleston Pony » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:58 pm

BRStang wrote:
Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.


A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's


I disagree


I'm looking at the talent we have on the field today and comparing it to the teams in the early 90's when we were re-building the roster...as in the team that lost to Houston 95-21. I would like to see what Gregg and Rossley could do with this level of talent compared to what they had in those days
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
 
Posts: 28960
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC


Return to Football

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 7 guests