This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Dwan · Post by **Dwan** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:35 pm

Pathetic. A football program is the best way to market your school. For 25 years we have been marketing that we are pathetic with a few signs of being mediocre.

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 1:36 pm

we always look good when we get a national TV game

birddogger · Post by **birddogger** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 2:09 pm

I hate to say this, but, this program isn't going any direction but down. We are back to the pre-JJ days but without the excuses the previous coaches had. Sad.

Treadway21 · Post by **Treadway21** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 3:22 pm

Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:26 pm

Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.

A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's

BRStang · Post by **BRStang** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:43 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.
A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's

I disagree

Treadway21 · Post by **Treadway21** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:52 pm

Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.
A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's

maybe - you could make that argument, but we have no excuse for not being competitive like we did post DP. This Houston team is not as good as any SWC team from the 90s and Tech and TCU turned out to be very mediocre teams.

This team looked totally unprepared not physically outclassed. That in my mind is the difference.

redpony · Post by **redpony** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:56 pm

yep- unprepared, unmotivated and had a very poor game plan. Not a good recipe for a novice QB.

Charleston Pony · Post by **Charleston Pony** » Fri Nov 29, 2013 4:58 pm

BRStang wrote:
Charleston Pony wrote:
Treadway21 wrote:Except we were playing good teams in the post DP SWC.
A&M was a good team this year. Tech, TCU and Houston are decent/average/mediocre teams and UCF looks like they might be another good team. The SWC was pretty weak in those early 90's but we are clearly more talented today than what we put on the field in the early 90's
I disagree

I'm looking at the talent we have on the field today and comparing it to the teams in the early 90's when we were re-building the roster...as in the team that lost to Houston 95-21. I would like to see what Gregg and Rossley could do with this level of talent compared to what they had in those days

This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s

Re: This looks like a post DP from the early 90s