NYC Mustang Club Event Recap

This is the forum for talk about SMU Football

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

PonyKai
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6160
Joined: Wed Mar 28, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Here and there.

Re: NYC Mustang Club Event Recap

Post by PonyKai »

I vaguely remember my HS counselor knowing jack and sh*t, and Jack left town years ago.
aus10fromhous10
Junior Varsity
Junior Varsity
Posts: 199
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 3:42 pm
Location: DFW

Re: NYC Mustang Club Event Recap

Post by aus10fromhous10 »

PerunaPunch wrote:The average student is -- just average. So as SMU's academic prestige increases, it will take more academic support resources to keep an average student in the same class with SMU's general student population (who are academically above average and in most cases come from strong educational backgrounds).

That accurately reflects the impression that I got from Hart. It's less about the dollar amount for tutors and other support (though that's certainly a part of the equation) and more about a student's ability to benefit from the resources.

It's like that old saying, "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." There's only so much improvement that can be achieved by offering these resources. So sure, you can admit a student athlete with a subpar academic record, but if s/he can't succeed in the classroom (even with extra help), then s/he won't be able to contribute to the team anyways. If half your team can't make grades, who are you going to put on the field?
User avatar
Digetydog
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 3913
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 5:33 am

Re: NYC Mustang Club Event Recap

Post by Digetydog »

aus10fromhous10 wrote:
PerunaPunch wrote:The average student is -- just average. So as SMU's academic prestige increases, it will take more academic support resources to keep an average student in the same class with SMU's general student population (who are academically above average and in most cases come from strong educational backgrounds).

That accurately reflects the impression that I got from Hart. It's less about the dollar amount for tutors and other support (though that's certainly a part of the equation) and more about a student's ability to benefit from the resources.

It's like that old saying, "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." There's only so much improvement that can be achieved by offering these resources. So sure, you can admit a student athlete with a subpar academic record, but if s/he can't succeed in the classroom (even with extra help), then s/he won't be able to contribute to the team anyways. If half your team can't make grades, who are you going to put on the field?


Let's say we have the ability to help 10 students (pick any number), why can't we use those resources on 4-5 star players instead of guys who are 2 star players?
Do unto others before they do unto you!!
smusportspage
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1589
Joined: Sat Mar 13, 2010 8:00 pm

Re: NYC Mustang Club Event Recap

Post by smusportspage »

Because you would probably have to triple your resources. Just sayin' :lol:
User avatar
blackoutpony
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4135
Joined: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:12 pm
Location: The Tomb of Ken Pye

Re: NYC Mustang Club Event Recap

Post by blackoutpony »

aus10fromhous10 wrote:
PerunaPunch wrote:The average student is -- just average. So as SMU's academic prestige increases, it will take more academic support resources to keep an average student in the same class with SMU's general student population (who are academically above average and in most cases come from strong educational backgrounds).

That accurately reflects the impression that I got from Hart. It's less about the dollar amount for tutors and other support (though that's certainly a part of the equation) and more about a student's ability to benefit from the resources.

It's like that old saying, "You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make it drink." There's only so much improvement that can be achieved by offering these resources. So sure, you can admit a student athlete with a subpar academic record, but if s/he can't succeed in the classroom (even with extra help), then s/he won't be able to contribute to the team anyways. If half your team can't make grades, who are you going to put on the field?


Stanford has figured it out, and they're a wayyyyyy better school than us that competes at a much higher level. It's proven that it can be done, it's a matter of whether we want to or not. We clearly don't :cry:
BOP - Providing insensitivity training for a politically correct world since 1989.
Post Reply