What does June mean by the level where we are?

by **Rebel10** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:52 pm

He said that he did not need to do many home visits for the level where we are. Does that mean he is recruiting lower level easy to get athletes on purpose? If he is doing that then we will stay where "we are."

by **SMU2007** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:54 pm

We do not need to do many home visits to achieve a fairly sh*tty lower tier, mid major conference team. He is probably correct.

by **smusic 00** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:03 pm

Rebel10 wrote:He said that he did not need to do many home visits for the level where we are. Does that mean he is recruiting lower level easy to get athletes on purpose? If he is doing that then we will stay where "we are."

Yes, that's what he means. You don't have to try hard to get players nobody else wants.

by **ponyboy** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:08 pm

@SMU2007, we've had the following conference finishes in the last five seasons:

2009: 3rd of 12 teams
2010: 5th of 12 teams
2011: 4th of 12 teams
2012: 3rd of 12 teams
2013: 6th of 10 teams

The 2013 season in the new AAC, while technically BCS, was somewhere between mid major and P5.

That's not sh*tty lower tier in our conference. That's a team generally in the upper tier of the conference.

Good enough for me? NO. But let's be a little more realistic. June doesn't murder nuns.

by **East Coast Mustang** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:10 pm

ponyboy wrote:@SMU2007, we've had the following conference finishes in the last five seasons:

2009: 3rd of 12 teams
2010: 5th of 12 teams
2011: 4th of 12 teams
2012: 3rd of 12 teams
2013: 6th of 10 teams

The 2013 season in the new AAC, while technically BCS, was somewhere between mid major and P5.

That's not sh*tty lower tier in our conference. That's a team generally in the upper tier of the conference.

Good enough for me? NO. But let's be a little more realistic. June doesn't murder nuns.

So we were decent when Klemm did all of the recruiting
We're also 9th out of 10 AAC teams from 2013 and lower than ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa. Am I supposed to be happy about this?

by **Barksdale Pony** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:14 pm

East Coast Mustang wrote:
ponyboy wrote:@SMU2007, we've had the following conference finishes in the last five seasons:

2009: 3rd of 12 teams
2010: 5th of 12 teams
2011: 4th of 12 teams
2012: 3rd of 12 teams
2013: 6th of 10 teams

The 2013 season in the new AAC, while technically BCS, was somewhere between mid major and P5.

That's not sh*tty lower tier in our conference. That's a team generally in the upper tier of the conference.

Good enough for me? NO. But let's be a little more realistic. June doesn't murder nuns.

So we were decent when Klemm did all of the recruiting
We're also 9th out of 10 AAC teams from 2013 and lower than ECU, Tulane, and Tulsa. Am I supposed to be happy about this?

Yes you are and if you complain the June apologists will try and stomp you.

by **smusic 00** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:17 pm

He thinks we need to win 10 games and beat Baylor to start attracting the kids who can help us get 10 wins and beat Baylor.

by **coloradoStang** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:22 pm

smusic 00 wrote:He thinks we need to win 10 games and beat Baylor to start attracting the kids who can help us get 10 wins and beat Baylor.

Compare that with LB's philosophy on recruiting

by **Digetydog** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:38 pm

Rebel10 wrote:He said that he did not need to do many home visits for the level where we are. Does that mean he is recruiting lower level easy to get athletes on purpose? If he is doing that then we will stay where "we are."

Where we can't afford to fire our coach.

by **Stallion** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:40 pm

Keep talking June-

by **Charleston Pony** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:41 pm

he basically implied they we're not even trying to compete against the P5 schools, but did throw in "we do play TCU" as if to say we should try to compete against them for some kids

by **Rebel10** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:44 pm

smusic 00 wrote:He thinks we need to win 10 games and beat Baylor to start attracting the kids who can help us get 10 wins and beat Baylor.

If he actually said that then I guess the USF coaches must not have heard that plan. They have the top class in the conference by far and did not win 10 games.

by **Treadway21** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:48 pm

Good news is that according to June we don't need an IPF since we aren't competing against like A T M and Baylor. Our facilities are fine for the players we are trying to land.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

by **GiddyUp** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:53 pm

smusic 00 wrote:He thinks we need to win 10 games and beat Baylor to start attracting the kids who can help us get 10 wins and beat Baylor.

now that is funny

by **Stallion** » Wed Feb 05, 2014 9:04 pm

You've got the realize what [deleted] he is throwin' down. What happened to:

"We are 1 1/2 recruiting classes from competing for a BCS Bowl"