SMU rarely gets it...

Anything involving SMU basketball belongs here.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
Duke Blue Blood
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1050
Joined: Wed Nov 20, 2002 4:01 am
Location: Dallas, TX

SMU rarely gets it...

Post by Duke Blue Blood »

1. I was not fot the Tubbs hire in the first place, but when you give a guy a contract, you let him finish...if he really violated any major rules, why did we pay out his contract?

2. I am sure Orsini must have somebody in mind. Nice of Copeland to take the fall for him.

3. Why is nobody paying attention to the fact that Williams essentially framed Tubbs?

Worst of all...we are going to get some run of the mill coach that is going to be no better than Tubbs. If we fired Tubbs and then announced our new Head Coach Mike Davis, nobody would have complained.

DBB
User avatar
smupony94
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 25665
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:34 am
Location: Bee Cave, Texas

Re: SMU rarely gets it...

Post by smupony94 »

Duke Blue Blood wrote:1. I was not fot the Tubbs hire in the first place, but when you give a guy a contract, you let him finish...if he really violated any major rules, why did we pay out his contract?

2. I am sure Orsini must have somebody in mind. Nice of Copeland to take the fall for him.

3. Why is nobody paying attention to the fact that Williams essentially framed Tubbs?

Worst of all...we are going to get some run of the mill coach that is going to be no better than Tubbs. If we fired Tubbs and then announced our new Head Coach Mike Davis, nobody would have complained.

DBB



DBB, read the board, williams is a [deleted].

Oh, Duke really sucks.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Re: SMU rarely gets it...

Post by Hoop Fan »

Duke Blue Blood wrote:1. I was not fot the Tubbs hire in the first place, but when you give a guy a contract, you let him finish...if he really violated any major rules, why did we pay out his contract?

2. I am sure Orsini must have somebody in mind. Nice of Copeland to take the fall for him.

3. Why is nobody paying attention to the fact that Williams essentially framed Tubbs?

Worst of all...we are going to get some run of the mill coach that is going to be no better than Tubbs. If we fired Tubbs and then announced our new Head Coach Mike Davis, nobody would have complained.

DBB


thank you for your common sense. jtstang said it well too. If at this point all you have is minor violations (very minor i might add), but the investigation is not complete, then you might oughta wait to fire anybody until the investigation is complete. Instead of firing them the week before national signing day on top of it. Genius, simply genius.
Stallion
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 44302
Joined: Tue Dec 19, 2000 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Texas,USA

Post by Stallion »

Name a cheater that wasn't given a buy-out of his contract-there are only a handful. That argument sounds nice-but isn't what happens in the college sports marketplace. All the big cheaters like Bobby Collins and Jackie Sherrill et all get bought out -not fired without compensation. It doesn't take a genius to figure out the reason for this and yet I've heard this same rationale posted on here about 50 times in 2 days.
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Post by Hoop Fan »

i agree he would get a buyout no matter what. But lets have the major violations. I wouldnt refer to someone as a cheater for burgers, soap, practice time and minor tutoring would you? I sure wouldnt compare them to Jackie Sherrill or Booby Collins.
User avatar
jtstang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11161
Joined: Sat Feb 21, 2004 10:21 am
Location: Dallas, TX

Re: SMU rarely gets it...

Post by jtstang »

Duke Blue Blood wrote:3. Why is nobody paying attention to the fact that Williams essentially framed Tubbs?

Good question.
Danny Noonan
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: Bushwood

Post by Danny Noonan »

While I don't agree with the reasons (made public) for the firing, I have no problem with the timing. If you've already made up your mind (pre-determined or seen enough evidence), do it as soon as possible. A lot of solid coaches are already off the market, and there are still plenty of openings yet to be filled. We don't want to wait until every single one of them is filled, and then fire our coach and start the search.
"Remember Danny - Two wrongs don't make a right but three rights make a left."
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Post by Hoop Fan »

Danny Noonan wrote:While I don't agree with the reasons (made public) for the firing, I have no problem with the timing. If you've already made up your mind (pre-determined or seen enough evidence), do it as soon as possible. A lot of solid coaches are already off the market, and there are still plenty of openings yet to be filled. We don't want to wait until every single one of them is filled, and then fire our coach and start the search.


valid point, IF we are going after a coach that other people want and can get him. Thats a big if. Also, you seem ok with the notion that this could have been pre-determined. Thats where we differ greatly. I think its horribly unfair and also damaging to program if this was pre-determined.
Danny Noonan
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 1:13 pm
Location: Bushwood

Post by Danny Noonan »

Hoop Fan wrote:
Danny Noonan wrote:While I don't agree with the reasons (made public) for the firing, I have no problem with the timing. If you've already made up your mind (pre-determined or seen enough evidence), do it as soon as possible. A lot of solid coaches are already off the market, and there are still plenty of openings yet to be filled. We don't want to wait until every single one of them is filled, and then fire our coach and start the search.


valid point, IF we are going after a coach that other people want and can get him. Thats a big if. Also, you seem ok with the notion that this could have been pre-determined. Thats where we differ greatly. I think its horribly unfair and also damaging to program if this was pre-determined.


No, I'm not OK with it being predetermined. I'm just saying that if they've already made up their mind, be that predetermined, through evidence, whatever, its best to move quickly. No need to wait until the investigation is formally concluded.
"Remember Danny - Two wrongs don't make a right but three rights make a left."
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Re: SMU rarely gets it...

Post by Pony_Fan »

jtstang wrote:
Duke Blue Blood wrote:3. Why is nobody paying attention to the fact that Williams essentially framed Tubbs?

Good question.


there have been plenty of references to this - witch hunt, etc.
User avatar
McClown27
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm
Contact:

Post by McClown27 »

When losing coaches have infractions/violations, they should probably not campaign to get extensions. Blog has referenced that a lot of people thought he was unstable, and his decision to take money from boosters was moronic. This whole thing is his fault, Williams was trying to avoid getting SMU athletics into bigger trouble.

If he had not taken the money, he would still be the coach. Based on the timing, this was not planned. Copeland was probably looking forward to recovering the last few months of his contract, not fire the coach he had hired two years prior.
Willis to slot receiver!
Terry Webster
PonyFans.com Legend
PonyFans.com Legend
Posts: 4502
Joined: Mon Feb 02, 2004 4:01 am
Location: Fort Thomas, KY

Post by Terry Webster »

I still wonder why in the world Tubbs broke the rules, however minor that they may turn out to be when he knew that SMU wouldn't tolerate any rules infractions? He had to know when he signed his contract that SMU had a zero tolerance policy about that, yet for whatever reason he brole the rules. Why?
User avatar
McClown27
Heisman
Heisman
Posts: 1030
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 6:07 pm
Contact:

Post by McClown27 »

Terry Webster wrote:I still wonder why in the world Tubbs broke the rules, however minor that they may turn out to be when he knew that SMU wouldn't tolerate any rules infractions? He had to know when he signed his contract that SMU had a zero tolerance policy about that, yet for whatever reason he brole the rules. Why?


Our current athletic model almost encourages cheating because we are at such a disadvantage. Malin and Tubbs were just trying to correct the competitive disadvantage.
Willis to slot receiver!
Hoop Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6814
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2000 4:01 am

Post by Hoop Fan »

Terry Webster wrote:I still wonder why in the world Tubbs broke the rules, however minor that they may turn out to be when he knew that SMU wouldn't tolerate any rules infractions? He had to know when he signed his contract that SMU had a zero tolerance policy about that, yet for whatever reason he brole the rules. Why?


since when does SMU have an absolute zero tolerance policy? Cavan was not fired over the Malin incident. Minor rules can get broken by just waking up in the morning. Dirty clothes happen. Either we had a mastermind plot regarding these violations or they are just random. If it has been proven that Tubbs did things systematically, then that would one thing. Nothing about this sounds systematic so far.
EastStang
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 12690
Joined: Fri Feb 15, 2002 4:01 am

Post by EastStang »

Then there's the little timing item of firing the coach less than a week before signing day. The good news is we won't be stuck with Tubbs recruits for four years. The bad news is that we won't have any new signees this year. I guess Matt will get plenty of playing time next year.
Post Reply