With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Discuss SMU recruiting in this forum.

Moderators: PonyPride, SmooPower

User avatar
westexSMU
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Mustang Island
Contact:

With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by westexSMU »

having to sit out the 2010 season, doesn't it make sense to go ahead and re offer talented WR De' Von Bailey who has shown his potential this spring as a walk on. Go ahead and get him over here as soon as possible where he can continue to learn the offense before fall practice.
Last edited by westexSMU on Sat Jun 12, 2010 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Cadillac
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2184
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
Location: McKinney

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Cadillac »

I certainly don't know the ins-and-ousts of scholarship awards, but if this is at all possible, I hope they make it happen. I really think De'Von can be a difference maker on this team.

-CoS
User avatar
ALEX LIFESON
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 11398
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 3:01 am
Location: GARLAND

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by ALEX LIFESON »

He would count against the 25 rule.
User avatar
westexSMU
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2303
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 7:03 pm
Location: Mustang Island
Contact:

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by westexSMU »

25 rule or not, the guy can play this year. I would certainly offer Bailey if the recent JUCO DT offer doesn't qualify.
Wuba
All-American
All-American
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Wuba »

westexSMU wrote:25 rule or not, the guy can play this year. I would certainly offer Bailey if the recent JUCO DT offer doesn't qualify.
If he can make it back by paying on his own, why use a scholarship on him that could be used on someone else?
User avatar
Cadillac
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2184
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
Location: McKinney

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Cadillac »

Wuba wrote:
westexSMU wrote:25 rule or not, the guy can play this year. I would certainly offer Bailey if the recent JUCO DT offer doesn't qualify.
If he can make it back by paying on his own, why use a scholarship on him that could be used on someone else?
There are reports that he might not be able to get the financing he needs for the Fall. With the loss of Wilkerson, WR suddenly becomes a priority and Bailey is considerably better than any other scholarship option we have unless someone at USC is bored of living in Watts.

-CoS
User avatar
Pony_Fan
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 6130
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2001 4:01 am
Location: Dallas,Tx, USA

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Pony_Fan »

with this news, what is the depth chart on WR's??
Charleston Pony
PonyFans.com Super Legend
PonyFans.com Super Legend
Posts: 29195
Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2000 3:01 am
Location: Stonebridge Golf Club, NC

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Charleston Pony »

I'd like to think we have depth at WR; this spells opportunity for someone. I'm ready to see if Haynes is up to the task; really need DJ to come on strong this year
Wuba
All-American
All-American
Posts: 966
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2007 3:32 pm
Location: Dallas

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Wuba »

Cadillac wrote:
Wuba wrote:
westexSMU wrote:25 rule or not, the guy can play this year. I would certainly offer Bailey if the recent JUCO DT offer doesn't qualify.
If he can make it back by paying on his own, why use a scholarship on him that could be used on someone else?
There are reports that he might not be able to get the financing he needs for the Fall. With the loss of Wilkerson, WR suddenly becomes a priority and Bailey is considerably better than any other scholarship option we have unless someone at USC is bored of living in Watts.

-CoS
You said he MIGHT not be able to get the financing, I said IF he can get back by paying on it own. We are both saying basically the same thing - there is a chance he can fund his way without a football scholarship. I ask again, why would you give him the football scholarship before you knew whether he would make it on his own?
User avatar
jason54858
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Around

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by jason54858 »

Cadillac wrote:
Wuba wrote:
westexSMU wrote:25 rule or not, the guy can play this year. I would certainly offer Bailey if the recent JUCO DT offer doesn't qualify.
If he can make it back by paying on his own, why use a scholarship on him that could be used on someone else?
There are reports that he might not be able to get the financing he needs for the Fall. With the loss of Wilkerson, WR suddenly becomes a priority and Bailey is considerably better than any other scholarship option we have unless someone at USC is bored of living in Watts.

-CoS
LOL, Bailey is the best option at WR? Really? The same kid who was cut in the beginning of last year is the best option at WR? Really? Why weren't the "less talented" WRs of the team cut then? OK then if thats the case lets cut Darius Johnson, Aldric Robinson, Brad Haynes, Lofton, better throw in Beasley in all this.
ozfan
All-American
All-American
Posts: 854
Joined: Wed Jun 18, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: Melbourne Australia

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by ozfan »

Jason Bailey was an allstate wr in high school, the old coach in his wisdom moved him to safety where he bulked up and lost his speed. He is down to a good playing weight now and also now back to his natural position. Friends who saw him play as a wr have said him is very good at that position.
He was cut for being late to meetings and class not for ability.
Sent from my KOREAN knockoff using Tapdance 5
User avatar
jason54858
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Around

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by jason54858 »

ozfan wrote:Jason Bailey was an allstate wr in high school, the old coach in his wisdom moved him to safety where he bulked up and lost his speed. He is down to a good playing weight now and also now back to his natural position. Friends who saw him play as a wr have said him is very good at that position.
He was cut for being late to meetings and class not for ability.
If Jones felt that Devon Bailey had any potentail at to be the "best WR on this team" he would not have cut him. It would be scary if Bailey did have that potentail and Jones still cut him wouldn't it? Cutting a player lose meant the coaches felt in their hearts that this player has no potentail to help their team now or in the near future. If Bailey losed wieght and thinks he is now committed to attend meetings on time thats fine, but you cant go from a player with no pontentail to "the best WR on the team". Dez Byrant had problems attending meetings up in Oklahoma State. You punish them internally you dont cut "the best WR on the team" and send him off to Texas A&M-Commerce.

I hope Bailey does find victory in whatever he does. I dont wish any ill will to the young man, but for you guys to say there is no player on this team on the roster right now capable of replacing the production of Wilkerson is laughable and idiotic.
User avatar
Cadillac
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2184
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
Location: McKinney

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Cadillac »

jason54858 wrote:
LOL, Bailey is the best option at WR? Really? The same kid who was cut in the beginning of last year is the best option at WR? Really? Why weren't the "less talented" WRs of the team cut then? OK then if thats the case lets cut Darius Johnson, Aldric Robinson, Brad Haynes, Lofton, better throw in Beasley in all this.


We're talking about adding additional depth at wide receiver in addition to the WR's already on the team. In my opinion Bailey is a better option than anyone else we can add for the upcoming season.

Please consider reading the threads before posting.

And Wuba, I totally agree, we're on the same page.

-CoS
User avatar
jason54858
Varsity
Varsity
Posts: 378
Joined: Sun Feb 04, 2007 12:56 am
Location: Around

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by jason54858 »

Cadillac wrote:
jason54858 wrote:
LOL, Bailey is the best option at WR? Really? The same kid who was cut in the beginning of last year is the best option at WR? Really? Why weren't the "less talented" WRs of the team cut then? OK then if thats the case lets cut Darius Johnson, Aldric Robinson, Brad Haynes, Lofton, better throw in Beasley in all this.


We're talking about adding additional depth at wide receiver in addition to the WR's already on the team. In my opinion Bailey is a better option than anyone else we can add for the upcoming season.

Please consider reading the threads before posting.

And Wuba, I totally agree, we're on the same page.

-CoS
OK, thats not what I read in your previous post. It sounded like to me that you thought Bailey was more talented then any WR we currently have, but if what you said above is your true feelings then thats fine. I dont agree with it, but your opinion is a logical one.
User avatar
Cadillac
Hall of Famer
Hall of Famer
Posts: 2184
Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 10:49 am
Location: McKinney

Re: With the possibilty of WR Wilkerson,

Post by Cadillac »

jason54858 wrote:
OK, thats not what I read in your previous post. It sounded like to me that you thought Bailey was more talented then any WR we currently have, but if what you said above is your true feelings then thats fine. I dont agree with it, but your opinion is a logical one.
While I'm all for agreeing to disagree, I am very curious as to who you think we can bring in at WR that would be better than Bailey. Care to share?

-CoS
Post Reply